Talk:Carl the Collector

Carl the Collector has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 22, 2025. (Reviewed version).

Animation: American / Television Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Autism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philadelphia Low‑importance

	Philadelphia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spoilers

Is it necessary for the plot summaries to have spoilers? Why can't they just tell the main part of the plot? 2603:8000:E800:5F4E:D0E3:AC1B:6F1B:2E4D (talk) 05:42, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:SPOILER. Lazman321 (talk) 16:29, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Neurodiverse vs Neurodivergent

I see my edit was reverted. I'm not sure if the revert was warranted. It's clear from the context that what makes the situation unique is the qualities of certain individuals. See https://neuroqueer.com/neurodiversity-terms-and-definitions/ 70.18.203.71 (talk) 22:20, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If no one has any objections, I'll go ahead and restore the language that's both accurate and preferred by the community. 70.18.203.71 (talk) 22:34, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The word "neurodiverse" in this article is used as an adjective for "people", as in plural. A group of people can be neurodiverse, and the page that you linked states that: "a neurodiverse group is a group in which multiple neurocognitive styles are represented." ... discospinster _talk 22:51, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's not really the sense being used here. In this case, it is a description of certain individuals. Did you get a chance to read Nick Walker's very relevant essay? Allow me to quote the relevant bits here: "To refer to neurominority groups or neurodivergent individuals as “neurodiverse” is incorrect grammatically, because diverse doesn’t mean different from the majority, it means made up of multiple different types. So an individual can never be diverse, by definition. And a group where everyone is neurodivergent in more or less the same way (e.g., a group composed entirely of Autistic people) wouldn’t be “neurodiverse,” either."

70.18.203.71 (talk) 22:55, 5 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Passed. IAWW (talk) 19:34, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Carl the Collector/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Lazman321 (talk · contribs) 21:24, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: It is a wonderful world (talk · contribs) 12:31, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: @DaniloDaysOfOurLives and I are working very hard to review every single GA nomination in the television section. Consider joining us to clear the backlog!

I'll review this one. I watched some clips of this show on YouTube and I am now thoroughly invested... IAWW (talk) 12:31, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lazman321 Comments are below. This was super fun to review! IAWW (talk) 20:53, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@IAWW: Thank you for your review. All concerns addressed. Lazman321 (talk) 18:20, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Lazman321 I'm happy with your changes. Passing now. IAWW (talk) 19:33, 22 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Prose (Criteria 1a, 1b, 4) clock

Lead

There is some information in the infobox that is not in the article. This should not be the case MOS:INFOBOXPURPOSE, and it is unsourced. IAWW (talk) 12:56, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Premise

Looks good :)

Cast

Looks good :)

Production

as he felt that the stigma surrounding disabilities would diminish: The way this is worded implies the stigma is an established fact, which would need better sourcing. I suggest rewording to emphasize that the existence of a stigma is part of his opinion, or adding a source that there is a stigma around disabilities like Austism and ADHD. IAWW (talk) 12:56, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Episodes

Carl agrees to take of the mug at home: Not sure what this is meant to mean IAWW (talk) 20:52, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

to participate with each other their activities at the same time: Doesn't make sense IAWW (talk) 20:52, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Broadcast and reception

Looks good :)

Sources Y

Health/formatting (Criterion 2a) Y

No issues for GA

Reliability (Criterion 2b) Y

Almost all news and magazines. No issues here.

Spot check (Criteria 2b, 2c, 2d) Y

[1a]: Y

[3d, 4a]: Y

[8b]: Y

[14]: Y

Copyvio (Criterion 2d) Y

Earwig finds nothing. I found no issues on the spot check.

Scope (Criteria 3a, 3b) Y

It appears to cover everything

Stable (Criterion 5) Y

Media Y

Tags (Criterion 6a) Y

Captions (Criterion 6b) Y

Suggestions (not needed for GA promotion)

Suggest archiving the remaining unarchived links IAWW (talk) 12:31, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.