Talk:Believe in Magic

Believe in Magic is currently an Economics and business good article nominee. Nominated by jolielover♥talk at 04:06, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article may review it according to the good article criteria to decide whether or not to list it as a good article. To start the review process, click start review and save the page. (See here for the good article instructions.)

Short description: British defunct charity

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from Believe in Magic appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 March 2025 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that a group of parents discovered that a children's charity had been embezzling money?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2025/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Believe in Magic.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 13:24, 6 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that a group of parents uncovered that a children's charity had been embezzling money?

Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65428918

ALT1: ... that the sister of the founder of a children's charity believes it was only started in order to meet boy band One Direction? Source: https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65428918
Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Gary Tuggle
Comment: I like ALT1 more, makes a silly last hook.

Created by Jolielover (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.

jolielover♥talk 06:02, 9 February 2025 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall:

Article was nominated within 7 days of creation and over 1,000 words in prose. Article's tone is neutral and sourced. Earwig picked up an unlikely copyright violation of 23.1%, which mostly consisted of medical terms for Bhari's condition. QPQ is done. I like ALT1 better, as it drew my attention a lot. Good work. lullabying (talk) 00:23, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]