Talk:Ayodhya
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ayodhya article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months ![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
![]() | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
A monastery or over a hundred monasteries at Ayodhya?
[edit]The 'Gupta period' section mentions Xuanzang has described only one monastery at Ayodhya but the main page on Xuanzang mentions, Ayodhya had over a hundred monasteries.[1] Could someone settle this? Tamir Nazir (talk) 07:55, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
References
- ^ Li Rongxi (1996), The Great Tang Dynasty Record of the Western Regions, Bukkyo Dendo Kyokai and Numata Center for Buddhist Translation and Research, Berkeley, pp. 123–133
Ahistorical Claims of "historical Saketa" and "Babri Mosque"
[edit]Highly likely violation of Wikipedia policy on neutrality and neutral tone. There is no primary source evidence for the obscurantist claim that it was historically known as Saketa, which projects a temporary designation as original. It also against explicit evidence (both archaeological and historical) and judicial rulings on the matter, conflating claims by current history writers with evidence. There is no historical evidence for a "Babri Mosque", the structure was historically referred to as "Masjid-e-Janmasthan", the term Babri Mosque is a post-independence invention. Usage of the term "Hindu mob" along with "Mughal Emperor", Babur and no other "mughal" identified as Mughal, is also extremely misleading. 2600:2B00:724A:4200:40D:CD4A:7252:1B3F (talk) 19:24, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
Wikipedia Contentious Page Policy Violation
[edit]"Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator". Given the contentiousness of the topic and edit protections, the editors and administrators have all seriously failed to adhere to purpose of Wikipedia as an accurate Encyclopedia, unless they were adhering to Islamist and left wing activist CEO Katherine Maher's stated purpose and hostility to truth. 2600:2B00:724A:4200:40D:CD4A:7252:1B3F (talk) 19:26, 14 May 2025 (UTC)
- C-Class level-5 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-5 vital articles in Geography
- C-Class vital articles in Geography
- C-Class WikiProject Cities articles
- All WikiProject Cities pages
- C-Class India articles
- Mid-importance India articles
- C-Class India articles of Mid-importance
- C-Class Indian cities articles
- High-importance Indian cities articles
- C-Class Indian cities articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Indian cities articles
- C-Class Uttar Pradesh articles
- Mid-importance Uttar Pradesh articles
- C-Class Uttar Pradesh articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Uttar Pradesh articles
- C-Class Indian history articles
- High-importance Indian history articles
- C-Class Indian history articles of High-importance
- WikiProject Indian history articles
- C-Class Indian politics articles
- Mid-importance Indian politics articles
- C-Class Indian politics articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Indian politics articles
- WikiProject India articles
- C-Class Hinduism articles
- High-importance Hinduism articles
- C-Class Swaminarayan articles
- High-importance Swaminarayan articles