Talk:Amaravati

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Amaravati article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 14 days

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

India High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in March 2019.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a contentious topic.

Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to discussions about infoboxes, and edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes, a contentious topic.

Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator.

Founder of Amaravati

Old City, Hyderabad was founded by Muhammad Quli Qutb Shah (died 1612), not some Chief Minister or Politician, who built a software park 386 years later 35 km away in the city of modern Hyderabad during 1990's. Similarly old city Amaravathi is founded by Vasireddy Venkatadri Nayudu (died 1816) not some Chief Minister or Politician who is building a government complex 200 years later 35 km away in the city of modern Amaravati in 2024, so pls change it in the Amaravati article's infobox. This is applicable to any city of the world, Amaravati is not unique to this. Just because somebody is a fan of N. Chandrababu Naidu, cannot endorse it to the article illogically.Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 06:38, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See comments in #Founder in the infobox.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nothing is there in your old comments. Not those old unclear and inarticulate comments made by you. Explain here specifically in reply to my question. You have not answered that. Instead of avoiding the topic, and escaping, it would be better if u get serious, and put ur logic on and explain how old city Hyderabad founder is different from old city Amaravathi founder. There are no sources and not random news reports over web which just mirror wikipedia article provided by you which do not show sources specifically using the line Amaravati founded by Naidu. And also provide me proof that consensus is achieved with atleast 2 other editors to ur point. Without 2 other editors consensus you cant just wrong me like u did before and get me blocked.Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 07:39, 23 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pls reply and show some respect to fellow editor or update founder in the article to Vasireddy Venkatadri Nayudu. Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 14:37, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You asked about consensus. Either three or four editors made a total of eleven edits that changed the "founder" field in the infobox to N. Chandrababu Naidu. Three of the edits were by two logged-in editors.^{04:35, 8 June 2024 (UTC), 16:02, 18 June 2024 (UTC), 04:18, 19 June 2024 (UTC)} Eight of the edits were by IP editors, with Bombay and Hyderabad IP addresses.^{01:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC), 05:20, 10 June 2024 (UTC), 09:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC), 13:10, 10 June 2024 (UTC), 12:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC), 03:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC), 01:59, 17 June 2024 (UTC), 05:02, 20 June 2024 (UTC)} Only one editor has expressed the view that the "founder" field in the infobox should not show N. Chandrababu Naidu. As pointed out to you on your talk page, the IP editor(s) gave a link supporting their version whereas you did not.^[1] Almost all the IP edits that changed the "founder" field in the infobox to N. Chandrababu Naidu had useful edit summaries that explained their point of view.

It would be absurd to have an infobox saying that the Amaravati was established in 2014 by a man who died on 17 August 1817.

There is an article on Amaravathi, Palnadu district that says that "Amaravathi was founded by Raja Vasireddy Venkatadri Nayudu in the 1790s".
There is a separate article on the new capital city of the Indian state of Andhra Pradesh that was established in 2014.

-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:25, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am asking you, how is this "Amaravati was established in 2014 by a man who died on 17 August 1817" is different from Old City, Hyderabad was founded by Muhammad Quli Qutb Shah (who died 1612). Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 02:22, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

and who founded Hyderabad ? the one who build the legislative assembly in the city? or Hitech city in the city chandra babau naidu? or Quli Qutub shah? so the argument is failing here right? some IP edits dont show here to me. I want consensus from other editors here in chat. If no consensus I will change the founder to Vasireddy after i get edit rights, and dont edit war with me at that time. Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 02:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If no consensus I will change the founder to Vasireddy after i get edit rights, and dont edit war with me at that time. Defo not a way to collaboratively edit. Pinging blocking admin @Daniel Case as the block is CTOPS, fyi. — DaxServer (t·m·e·c) 07:26, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have extended their block from this page for another two months. "If no consensus I will change the founder to Vasireddy after i get edit rights, and dont edit war with me at that time. Wow ... slam-dunk evidence of a battleground mentality. Daniel Case (talk) 19:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Listen disrespectful editor, I am slam dunk? you will slam and kill me in battleground? are you threatening me? what language is this slam dunk? I will report you in admin notice board for abusive language slam-dunk. Without consensus on content how other people can edit a page? I want consensus on founder of Amaravati if you are competent enough argue on that, block editors is easy but contributing is difficult. You have zero collaborative contribution on the article and you talk non sense about me? you have blocking rights doesnt make you better than me. You have battleground mentality not me. The other editors have no argument to make with me on the content, you block him Toddy Toddy of the europa. You First solve the content dispute above, it is your responsibility to resolve it, not mine then u can keep blocking people, you dont have any work other than that anyways.Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 03:40, 27 June 2024 (UTC)c[reply]

@Ustadeditor2011: Please read slam dunk.-- Toddy1 (talk) 05:41, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I wont read slam dunk. You have not yet answered the main point which I raised. And you are diverting the point. Ustadeditor2011 (talk) 12:29, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How is it not absurd in the infobox of Hyderabad Quli Qutub Shah by a man who died on 11 January 1612? how is it different in Amaravati I am asking you, and no body has anser to that, instead of answering to that question you deviate and waste time? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ustadeditor2011 (talk • contribs) 04:19, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]