Draft:Gaadi Number 1760
| Submission declined on 28 June 2025 by Fade258 (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|  |
| Submission declined on 25 June 2025 by Theroadislong (talk). This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are: Declined by Theroadislong 41 days ago.
| |
| Submission declined on 23 June 2025 by CoconutOctopus (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by CoconutOctopus 43 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 22 June 2025 by Rambley (talk). This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Rambley 44 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 22 June 2025 by Qcne (talk). This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources. Declined by Qcne 44 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 22 June 2025 by Bonadea (talk). This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies. This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia. Declined by Bonadea 44 days ago. | |
| Submission declined on 19 June 2025 by MCE89 (talk). This submission appears to be taken from https://www.imdb.com/title/tt36991132/plotsummary/?ref_=tt_ov_pl. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Declined by MCE89 47 days ago.
| |
Comment: It requires reliable and independent references to the subject having significant coverage. Fade258 (talk) 19:04, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: I have not copied any material from outside all the writing is mine as this movie is made by me
- Comment: Please see Help:Referencing for beginners. A large collection of links are not sufficient as references. YouTube is not a reliable source. The singular claim in the "Production" section is unsourced. Rambley (talk) 16:11, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Resubmitted without any changes after draftification. Please address the question about conflict of interest. bonadea contributions talk 09:26, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- Comment: Plot summary and part of the lead appears to have been copied from IMDB MCE89 (talk) 11:52, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
| Gaadi Number 1760 | |
|---|---|
| Directed by | Yogiraj Sanjay Gaikwad |
| Written by | Yogiraj Sanjay Gaikwad |
| Screenplay by | Yogiraj Sanjay Gaikwad |
| Produced by | Kailash Sorari; Vimla Sorari |
| Starring | Prathamesh Parab
Shubhankar Tawde Priyadarshini Indalkar Prasad Khandekar Suhas Joshi Shashank Shende Shrikant Yadav |
| Cinematography | Siddharth More |
| Edited by | Guru Patil; Mahesh Killekar |
| Music by | Samir Saptiskar |
| Distributed by | Cinepolis India |
Release date |
|
Running time | 123 minutes |
| Language | Marathi |
Gaadi Number 1760 (transl. Car No. 1760) is a 2025 Marathi-language Comedy,-Suspense-Thriller movie written & directed by Yogiraj Sanjay Gaikwad and produced by Kailash Sorari and Vimla Sorari under the banner of Tanvi Films. The film stars an ensemble cast including Prathamesh Parab, Shubhankar Tawde, Priyadarshini Indalkar, Prasad Khandekar, Suhas Joshi , Shashank Shende and Shrikant Yadav.[1]
Production
[edit]Filming
[edit]The first schedule of filming commenced on 9th April 2024 and lasted for approximately 6 months. The film was shot entirely in Mumbai.
Marketing and Release
[edit]On title motion poster was unveiled on 19th May 2025, and film teaser was released on 5th June 2025.[2]
Soundtrack
[edit]The music was composed by Samir Saptiskar and lyrics were written by Vaibhav Deshmukh
| Track | Song | Singer(s) |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | "Zanana Jhala"[3] | Ashish Kulkarni |
| 2 | "Palav Boom" | Adarsh Shinde |
References
[edit]- ^ "Gaadi Number 1760 (2025) - Movie | Reviews, Cast & Release Date in mumbai". BookMyShow. Retrieved 2025-06-22.
- ^ TANVI FILMS (2025-06-05). GAADI NUMBER 1760 | Official Teaser | Prathamesh P | Shubhankar T | Priyadarshini | Prasad K, 4 July. Retrieved 2025-06-22 – via YouTube.
- ^ Saregama Marathi (2025-06-20). Zanana Jhala | Gaadi Number 1760 | Prathamesh Parab | Priyadarshini | Ashish Kulkarni | Samir S. Retrieved 2025-06-22 – via YouTube.
- ^ "Gaadi Number 1760 Trailer : गाडी नंबर 1760 चा धमाकेदार ट्रेलर प्रदर्शित". June 19, 2025.
- ^ "गाडी नंबर १७६०चा धमाकेदार ट्रेलर प्रदर्शित". June 20, 2025.
- ^ MMW, Team (June 5, 2025). "Fun filled teaser of 'Gaadi Number 1760' released".
- ^ "Gaadi No 1760 - Official Teaser". The Times of India.
External links
[edit]