Diaphoretickes
Diaphoretickes Temporal range: [1]
| |
---|---|
Diaphoretickes diversity (clockwise from top left): sunflower (Archaeplastida), ciliate (Alveolata), kelp (Stramenopiles), cryptomonad (Cryptista), foram (Rhizaria), centrohelid (Haptista) | |
Scientific classification ![]() | |
Domain: | Eukaryota |
Clade: | Diaphoretickes Adl et al., 2012[2] |
Clades | |
Possibly included: | |
Synonyms | |
Diaphoretickes (from Greek διαφορετικές (diaforetikés) 'diverse') is a major evolutionary lineage, or clade, of eukaryotic organisms spanning over 600,000 species. They comprise an enormous diversity of life forms, from single-celled protozoa to multicellular plants and numerous types of algae. The clade was discovered through phylogenetic analyses in the 21st century that revealed a close relationship between the supergroups Archaeplastida (or plants in a broad sense), Haptista, Cryptista, and SAR (Stramenopiles, Alveolata and Rhizaria).
Before molecular analyses recovered this clade, evolutionary biologist Thomas Cavalier-Smith had already hypothesized an evolutionary proximity between plants and the remaining groups (collectively known as 'chromalveolates' in his classification system). He coined the term photokaryotes for these organisms, as they include almost all of the photosynthetic eukaryotes. He later called them corticates due to the presence of cortical alveoli in many of their members.
Although Diaphoretickes contains organisms of very different morphologies, they have a few common traits. Ancestrally they are similar to excavates, with two flagella and a ventral feeding groove. In addition, the presence of cortical alveoli and flagellar hairs are interpreted as ancestral traits unique to the group. Some traits appeared convergently in many groups, such as the acquisition of chloroplasts through primary and secondary endosymbioses and the presence of axopodia and a heliozoan-type cell. In particular, chloroplasts with chlorophyll c and heliozoan cells are exclusive to Diaphoretickes.
Within Diaphoretickes, Cryptista and the heliozoan Microheliella maris form the clade Pancryptista, which is the closest relative to Archaeplastida, together forming the CAM clade. Haptista and SAR are closer to each other and to a clade of flagellates known as Telonemia. In addition, three small groups of protists, Provora, Hemimastigophora and Meteora sporadica, form a clade that may belong to Diaphoretickes.
Etymology
[edit]The name Diaphoretickes derives from Greek διαφορετικές (diaforetikés) meaning diverse, dissimilar, referring to the wide morphological and cellular diversity among members of this clade.[2]
History
[edit]Eukaryotes, organisms whose cells contain a nucleus, have been traditionally grouped into four kingdoms: animals, plants, fungi and protists. In the late 20th century, molecular phylogenetic analyses revealed that protists are a paraphyletic assortment of many independent evolutionary lineages or clades, from which animals, fungi and plants evolved.[7][8] However, the relationships between these clades remained difficult to assess due to technological limitations.[9] Starting in the early 2000s, improvements on phylogenetics allowed the classification of most eukaryotes into a small number of diverse clades called supergroups.[10][11]
In 2008, a close evolutionary relationship was discovered between some of these clades: Archaeplastida (plants and relatives; sometimes known as kingdom Plantae),[12] SAR (stramenopiles, alveolates and rhizarians), and two smaller groups of algae, haptophytes and cryptomonads. This collection of organisms contains almost all eukaryotes capable of photosynthesis.[13]
The SAR, haptophytes and cryptomonads were collectively known as chromalveolates[14][15] or kingdom Chromista due to a hypothesized common ancestor that obtained the ability to photosynthesize, as algae included in them usually contain a unique pigment, chlorophyll c.[8][12] The relationship between plants and chromalveolates had been described earlier by evolutionary biologist Thomas Cavalier-Smith (1942–2021), who referred to the clade containing both groups as photokaryotes since most of their members are photosynthetic.[16][5] He later called them corticates, suggesting that they share a common ancestor due to the presence of cortical alveoli (vesicles underneath the cell membrane) in some of their members (glaucophytes and alveolates).[17][18][19] However, these names became obsolete, largely due to the discovery that chromalveolates are not monophyletic: these algae evolved the ability to photosynthesize independently from one another.[13]
In 2012, a publication by the International Society of Protistologists (ISOP) established a taxonomic name for this clade, Diaphoretickes, with the following phylogenetic definition:[2]
"The most inclusive clade containing Bigelowiella natans Moestrup & Sengco 2001 (Rhizaria), Tetrahymena thermophila Nanney & McCoy 1976 (Alveolata), Thalassiosira pseudonana Cleve 1873 (Stramenopiles), and Arabidopsis thaliana (Linnaeus) Heynhold, 1842 (Archaeplastida), but not Homo sapiens Linnaeus 1758 (Opisthokonta), Dictyostelium discoideum Raper 1935 (Amoebozoa) or Euglena gracilis Klebs 1883 (Excavata). This is a branch-based definition in which all of the specifiers are extant."
In the following years, higher quality phylogenetic analyses recovered more protists that fall into this definition (e.g., telonemids, centrohelids, katablepharids), leading to new clades within Diaphoretickes, such as Haptista (centrohelids and haptophytes) and Cryptista (cryptomonads, katablepharids and relatives).[20]
In 2015, Cavalier-Smith and co-authors rejected the name Diaphoretickes proposed by the ISOP, arguing that it was "an entirely unnecessary, and less euphonious third synonym with no intuitive meaning [...] which is destabilising and should not be used". Instead, they suggested converting a pre-existing taxonomic name, Corticata,[a] for the clade containing Chromista and Archaeplastida (Plantae).[4] This did not reach consensus, and Diaphoretickes remains widely accepted by the scientific community as the name of this major eukaryotic clade.[21]
Description
[edit]Diversity
[edit]Diaphoretickes includes eukaryotes of very different morphologies, cellular structures, life cycles and habitats. They range from photosynthetic algae to highly specialized parasites and even large, multicellular organisms like land plants. As such, they include most of the Earth's biomass, with land plants alone occupying over 81% of the total planet biomass.[22] Its major groups are: Archaeplastida, SAR supergroup, Haptista and Cryptista.[21] Also included is a small group of single-celled flagellates known as Telonemia, which contains 7 species.[23]
Archaeplastida includes organisms with chloroplasts derived directly from a primary endosymbiosis event with a cyanobacterium. They amount to an estimated 450,000–500,000 species. Although known as plants by some authors,[24] archaeplastids include many protists that do not belong to the multicellular land plants or embryophytes (such as mosses, conifers, ferns, flowering plants). These protists are primarily the red algae, glaucophyte algae, and green algae, from which embryophytes evolved. Archaeplastids also include two small groups of heterotrophic flagellates closely related to red algae: rhodelphids and picozoans.[25] Embryophytes, green algae and red algae all evolved multicellular forms and complex life cycles independently,[26] but embryophytes are distinguished by the retention of the zygote (fertilized egg cell) as an embryo, instead of its dispersal as a single cell.[27]
The SAR supergroup is named after its three constituent clades: stramenopiles, alveolates and rhizarians. The stramenopiles gather more than 100,000 species in total[28] and comprise many heterotrophic unicellular or fungus-like organisms (e.g., oomycetes, labyrinthulids, bicosoecids, opalinids), but the described diversity is concentrated in the ochrophytes, the photosynthetic clade (e.g., diatoms, kelp, golden algae). They are distinguished by the presence of straw-like mastigonemes (flagellar hairs) in one of their two flagella, when present.[29] The alveolates are unicellular protists primarily composed of three large, well-studied groups: ciliates (more than 8,000 species, mostly free-living heterotrophs),[30] dinoflagellates (~4,500 species, many photosynthetic)[31] and apicomplexans (more than 6,000 parasitic species), all of which are unicellular.[32] In particular, dinoflagellates, apicomplexans and various smaller groups (e.g., chromerids) evolved from a photosynthetic ancestor and are collectively known as myzozoans.[33] The rhizarians are a diverse group of mostly amoeboid unicellular organisms of very different lifestyles, such as the free-living radiolarians (over 1,000 living species)[34] and forams (over 6,700 living species),[35] the fungus-like phytomyxeans, the parasitic ascetosporeans, and the photosynthetic chlorarachniophytes.[36]
Haptista is composed of two groups of single-celled organisms with mineralized scales. The first are the photosynthetic haptophytes (e.g., the calcifying coccolithophores), of which there are over 500 living species.[37][38] The second are the heterotrophic centrohelid amoebae, with around 95 species.[39] Cryptista is a group of fully single-celled flagellated organisms, among which are the photosynthetic cryptomonads (more than 100 species)[40] and related heterotrophs, namely the katablepharids and the species Palpitomonas bilix.[21]
Ancestral traits
[edit]
Despite their large diversity of forms, a few morphological traits are common to corticates. They are biflagellates or bikonts, meaning their cells typically have two flagella.[19] Their cells ancestrally have a ventral groove for feeding, as observed in early-branching species (e.g., the alveolate Colponema and the stramenopiles Kaonashia and Platysulcus).[41][42] These cellular traits are typical of excavates, a paraphyletic group composed of the most basal eukaryotes (i.e., Discoba, Metamonada and Malawimonada); they are likely the ancestral traits of all eukaryotes.[15][43]
In addition, as opposed to excavates, many Diaphoretickes members have cortical alveoli (flattened vesicles beneath the cell surface), such as glaucophytes, alveolates, haptophytes, telonemids[23] and some early-branching stramenopiles (e.g., Kaonashia, bigyromonads).[42] Due to the wide occurrence of these alveoli, various researchers consider them an ancestral characteristic of Diaphoretickes.[12][23] Another frequent trait is the presence of flagellar hairs, also considered ancestral and unique to Diaphoretickes.[41]
Convergent traits
[edit]Multiple lineages within Diaphoretickes have acquired photosynthetic plastids independently from each other, evolving into algae. They include all eukaryotic algae except for euglenophytes, which belong to the Discoba. Archaeplastids acquired their plastids directly from primary endosymbiosis with a cyanobacterium, while all other algae have plastids originating from a secondary endosymbiosis with either a red alga (as in ochrophytes, myzozoans, cryptomonads and haptophytes) or a green alga (as in chlorarachniophytes).[13] Red algal-derived plastids are exclusive to the Diaphoretickes clade, while green algal-derived ones are also present in euglenophytes.[44][1] One rhizarian species, Paulinella chromatophora, experienced an event of primary endosymbiosis with a different kind of cyanobacterium.[45]
The exact order of the red algal-derived plastid acquisitions is not yet known. Two main hypotheses agree that cryptophytes were the first to obtain them, and the remaining groups obtained theirs by endosymbiosis with a cryptophyte.[1] A third hypothesis proposed in 2024 suggests that there were two independent endosymbioses of a red alga in cryptophytes and ochrophytes, which in turn originated the plastids of haptophytes and myzozoans, respectively.[46]

Diaphoretickes also includes all amoebae that have axopodia, stiff filaments used for feeding that branch radially from the cell, a trait acquired independently in various groups. These were historically known as Actinopoda, and were divided into the marine radiolaria (rhizarians) and the mostly freshwater heliozoa ("sun animalcules").[47] The heliozoa are primarily the centrohelids (relatives of haptophytes), actinophryids (stramenopiles) and desmothoracids (rhizarians).[48] There are also some lone heliozoan species such as Microheliella maris, the sister group of Cryptista.[49] Even heliozoa that have not been genetically sequenced are presumed to belong to Diaphoretickes.[50] Cavalier-Smith argued that the ancestral configuration of the cytoskeleton of corticates was a preadaptation that made it easier for them to evolve axopodia numerous independent times.[51]
Evolution
[edit]Evolutionary relationships are still uncertain between the different clades of Diaphoretickes. Haptista and Cryptista, initially hypothesized as relatives of each other (collectively known as the taxon Hacrobia), were later revealed to be more distantly related.[52] In particular, Cryptista and the species Microheliella maris form a clade known as Pancryptista, which in turn is the closest relative of Archaeplastida, together forming the proposed 'CAM' clade.[49][53] Telonemia, previously assigned to Hacrobia,[4] is sometimes resolved as the sister clade of the SAR supergroup, forming the hypothesized TSAR clade,[23] while other studies resolve it as more closely related to Haptista.[54]
Three small groups of protists—provorans, hemimastigotes, and the species Meteora sporadica—form a clade that may be either related to or inside of Diaphoretickes, depending on the analysis.[54][55][56] Before phylogenomic data from Meteora and provorans became available, there was already a known affinity between hemimastigotes and Diaphoretickes, although the exact position of hemimastigotes remained unclear.[57] Cavalier-Smith proposed that hemimastigotes were the closest relatives of Diaphoretickes (known by him as corticates), and established the name eucorta (eu-, 'well-developed' and cortex, 'bark') for their suggested clade, since both groups have a cortical pellicle: with cortical alveoli in corticates, and with microtubules and a proteinaceous thickening in hemimastigotes instead.[6] According to the phylogenetic definition of Diaphoretickes, any organism that is more closely related to them than to Discoba or Amorphea is considered part of them, which renders 'eucorta' a synonym of Diaphoretickes.[21]
The following cladogram summarizes the relationships within Diaphoretickes, according to phylogenomic analyses of the 2020s.[58][55][54][56] Chromalveolates are marked *; clades containing heliozoa are marked **.[4]
Diaphoretickes |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(corticates) |
There is uncertainty regarding relationships with the remaining eukaryotic clades.[59] Between Diaphoretickes and Amorphea, the two major clades of eukaryotes,[21] there are many smaller clades—Discoba, Metamonada, Malawimonada, Ancyromonadida, CRuMs, and the aforementioned provoran-hemimastigote-Meteora clade—that may branch closer to one or the other, or closer to the root of the eukaryotic tree, depending on the analysis.[55][43] Only some analyses find a closer relationship between Diaphoretickes and the Discoba clade, together known as Diphoda.[54] According to a 2021 molecular clock analysis, Diaphoretickes diverged from other eukaryotes during the Paleoproterozoic (2.2 to 1.6 billion years ago), although the first putative fossils originated during the Mesoproterozoic.[1]
Notes
[edit]- ^ a b The taxonomic name Corticata has changed in composition several times. It was first coined by zoologist Edwin Ray Lankester in 1878 as one of the two categories of the Protozoa (the other being Gymnomyxa), which he interpreted as a subkingdom of animals.[3] In his system, Corticata included flagellated protists, many of which fall in Diaphoretickes (e.g., heterokonts, dinoflagellates, ciliates),[2][4] while Gymnomyxa (meaning 'naked slime') included amoebae. In 2002, evolutionary biologist Thomas Cavalier-Smith adopted these two names as subkingdoms of his own proposed kingdom Protozoa. He redefined Corticata to group Excavata and Rhizaria, due to similarities in their cytoskeleton.[5] This definition was polyphyletic and fell out of use. After the description of Diaphoretickes, Cavalier-Smith repurposed Corticata in 2015 as its synonym.[4]
References
[edit]- ^ a b c d e Strassert, Jürgen F. H.; Irisarri, Iker; Williams, Tom A.; Burki, Fabien (25 March 2021). "A molecular timescale for eukaryote evolution with implications for the origin of red algal-derived plastids" (PDF). Nature Communications. 12 (1): 1879. Bibcode:2021NatCo..12.1879S. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-22044-z. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 7994803. PMID 33767194. Retrieved 13 May 2025.
- ^ a b c d Adl, Sina M.; Simpson, Alastair G. B.; Lane, Christopher E.; Lukeš, Julius; Bass, David; et al. (28 September 2012). "The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes". The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 59 (2): 429–514. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2012.00644.x. PMC 3483872. PMID 23020233.
- ^ Lankester, E. Ray (September 1878). "Preface to the English translation". In Gegenbaur, Carl (ed.). Elements of Comparative Anatomy. London: MacMillan and co. p. xviii.
- ^ a b c d e f Cavalier-Smith, Thomas; Chao, Ema E.; Lewis, Rhodri (2015). "Multiple origins of Heliozoa from flagellate ancestors: New cryptist subphylum Corbihelia, superclass Corbistoma, and monophyly of Haptista, Cryptista, Hacrobia and Chromista". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 93: 331–362. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2015.07.004.
- ^ a b Cavalier-Smith, T (1 March 2002). "The phagotrophic origin of eukaryotes and phylogenetic classification of Protozoa". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 52 (2): 297–354. doi:10.1099/00207713-52-2-297. ISSN 1466-5026.
- ^ a b Cavalier-Smith, Thomas (23 December 2021). "Ciliary transition zone evolution and the root of the eukaryote tree: implications for opisthokont origin and classification of kingdoms Protozoa, Plantae, and Fungi". Protoplasma. 259: 487–593. doi:10.1007/s00709-021-01665-7. PMC 9010356.
- ^ Scamardella JM (1999). "Not plants or animals: A brief history of the origin of Kingdoms Protozoa, Protista, and Protoctista". International Microbiology. 2 (4): 207–221. PMID 10943416.
- ^ a b Blackwell, Will H. (August 2009). "Chromista revisited: a dilema of overlapping putative kingdoms, and the attempted application of the botanical code of nomenclature" (PDF). Phytologia. 91 (2): 191–225. Retrieved 9 June 2025.
- ^ Keeling, Patrick J.; Burger, Gertraud; Durnford, Dion G.; Lang, B. Franz; Lee, Robert W.; Pearlman, Ronald E.; Roger, Andrew J.; Gray, Michael W. (2005). "The tree of eukaryotes". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 20 (12): 670–676. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.09.005.
- ^ Burki, Fabien; Shalchian-Tabrizi, Kamran; Minge, Marianne; Skjæveland, Åsmund; Nikolaev, Sergey I.; Jakobsen, Kjetill S.; Pawlowski, Jan (29 August 2007). "Phylogenomics Reshuffles the Eukaryotic Supergroups". PLoS ONE. 2 (8): e790. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000790. ISSN 1932-6203. PMC 1949142. PMID 17726520.
- ^ Burki, Fabien; Roger, Andrew J.; Brown, Matthew W.; Simpson, Alastair G.B. (2020). "The New Tree of Eukaryotes". Trends in Ecology & Evolution. 35 (1): 43–55. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2019.08.008. Retrieved 2025-06-05.
- ^ a b c Cavalier-Smith, Thomas (23 June 2010). "Kingdoms Protozoa and Chromista and the eozoan root of the eukaryotic tree". Biology Letters. 6 (3): 342–345. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2009.0948. ISSN 1744-9561. PMC 2880060. PMID 20031978.
- ^ a b c Burki, Fabien; Shalchian-Tabrizi, Kamran; Pawlowski, Jan (23 August 2008). "Phylogenomics reveals a new 'megagroup' including most photosynthetic eukaryotes". Biology Letters. 4 (4): 366–369. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2008.0224. ISSN 1744-9561. PMC 2610160. PMID 18522922. Retrieved 7 June 2025.
- ^ Adl, Sina M.; Simpson, Alastair G. B.; Farmer, Mark A.; Andersen, Robert A.; Anderson, O. Roger; et al. (19 October 2005). "The New Higher Level Classification of Eukaryotes with Emphasis on the Taxonomy of Protists". The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 52 (2): 399–451. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.00053.x. PMID 16248873.
- ^ a b Hampl, Vladimir; Hug, Laura; Leigh, Jessica W.; Dacks, Joel B.; Lang, B. Franz; Simpson, Alastair G. B.; Roger, Andrew J. (10 March 2009). "Phylogenomic analyses support the monophyly of Excavata and resolve relationships among eukaryotic "supergroups"". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 106 (10): 3859–3864. doi:10.1073/pnas.0807880106. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 2656170. PMID 19237557. Retrieved 7 June 2025.
- ^ Cavalier-Smith, Tom (1999). "Principles of protein and lipid targeting in secondary symbiogenesis: euglenoid, dinoflagellate, and sporozoan plastid origins and the eukaryote family tree". Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 46 (4): 347–366. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.1999.tb04614.x.
- ^ Cavalier-Smith, Thomas (2003). "Protist phylogeny and the high-level classification of Protozoa". European Journal of Protistology. 39 (4): 338–348. doi:10.1078/0932-4739-00002.
- ^ Cavalier‐Smith, Thomas (24 March 2009). "Megaphylogeny, Cell Body Plans, Adaptive Zones: Causes and Timing of Eukaryote Basal Radiations". Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 56 (1): 26–33. doi:10.1111/j.1550-7408.2008.00373.x. ISSN 1066-5234.
- ^ a b c Cavalier-Smith T, Chao EE, Snell EA, Berney C, Fiore-Donno AM, Lewis R (December 2014). "Multigene eukaryote phylogeny reveals the likely protozoan ancestors of opisthokonts (animals, fungi, choanozoans) and Amoebozoa". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 81: 71–85. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2014.08.012. PMID 25152275.
- ^ Burki, Fabien; Kaplan, Maia; Tikhonenkov, Denis V.; Zlatogursky, Vasily; Minh, Bui Quang; Radaykina, Liudmila V.; Smirnov, Alexey; Mylnikov, Alexander P.; Keeling, Patrick J. (27 January 2016). "Untangling the early diversification of eukaryotes: a phylogenomic study of the evolutionary origins of Centrohelida, Haptophyta and Cryptista". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 283 (1823): 20152802. doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.2802. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 4795036. PMID 26817772.
- ^ a b c d e Adl, Sina M.; Bass, David; Lane, Christopher E.; Lukeš, Julius; Schoch, Conrad L.; et al. (26 September 2018). "Revisions to the Classification, Nomenclature, and Diversity of Eukaryotes". The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 66 (1): 4–119. doi:10.1111/JEU.12691. PMC 6492006. PMID 30257078.
- ^ Bar-On YM, Phillips R, Milo R (June 2018). "The biomass distribution on Earth". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 115 (25): 6506–6511. doi:10.1073/pnas.1711842115. PMC 6016768. PMID 29784790.
- ^ a b c d Tikhonenkov, Denis V.; Jamy, Mahwash; Borodina, Anastasia S.; Belyaev, Artem O.; Zagumyonnyi, Dmitry G.; Prokina, Kristina I.; Mylnikov, Alexander P.; Burki, Fabien; Karpov, Sergey A. (16 March 2022). "On the origin of TSAR: morphology, diversity and phylogeny of Telonemia". Open Biology. 12 (3). The Royal Society. doi:10.1098/rsob.210325. ISSN 2046-2441. PMC 8924772. PMID 35291881.
- ^ Bowles, Alexander M.C.; Williamson, Christopher J.; Williams, Tom A.; Lenton, Timothy M.; Donoghue, Philip C.J. (2023). "The origin and early evolution of plants". Trends in Plant Science. 28 (3): 312–329. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2022.09.009. hdl:10871/131900.
- ^ Prokina, Kristina I.; Tikhonenkov, Denis V.; López-García, Purificación; Moreira, David (2023). "Morphological and molecular characterization of a new member of the phylum Rhodelphidia". Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 71 (2): e12995. doi:10.1111/jeu.12995. PMID 37548159.
- ^ Lamża, Łukasz (2023). "Diversity of 'simple' multicellular eukaryotes: 45 independent cases and six types of multicellularity". Biological Reviews. 98 (6): 2188–2209. doi:10.1111/brv.13001. ISSN 1464-7931. Retrieved 26 June 2025.
- ^ Niklas, Karl J.; Kutschera, Ulrich (2010). "The evolution of the land plant life cycle". New Phytologist. 185 (1): 27–41. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03054.x. ISSN 0028-646X.
- ^ H.S. Yoon; R.A. Andersen; S.M. Boo; D. Bhattacharya (17 February 2009). "Stramenopiles". Encyclopedia of Microbiology (Third Edition): 721–731. doi:10.1016/B978-012373944-5.00253-4. Retrieved 2 March 2024.
- ^ Jirsová, Dagmar; Wideman, Jeremy G. (30 July 2024). "Integrated overview of stramenopile ecology, taxonomy, and heterotrophic origin". The ISME Journal. 18 (1): wrae150. doi:10.1093/ismejo/wrae150. PMC 11412368. PMID 39077993.
- ^ Lynn, Denis H. (2017). "Ciliophora". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 679–730. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_23. ISBN 978-3-319-28147-6.
- ^ Saldarriaga, Juan F.; Taylor, F. J. R. 'Max' (2017). "Dinoflagellata". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 625–678. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_22. ISBN 978-3-319-28147-6.
- ^ Votýpka, Jan; Modrý, David; Oborník, Miroslav; Šlapeta, Jan; Lukeš, Julius (2017). "Apicomplexa". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 567–624. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_20. ISBN 978-3-319-28147-6.
- ^ Muñoz-Gómez, Sergio A.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (2018). "Plastid Genomes in the Myzozoa". Advances in Botanical Research. Vol. 85. Elsevier. p. 55–94. doi:10.1016/bs.abr.2017.11.015. ISBN 978-0-12-813457-3.
- ^ Biard, Tristan (2022). "Diversity and ecology of Radiolaria in modern oceans". Environmental Microbiology. 24 (5): 2179–2200. Bibcode:2022EnvMi..24.2179B. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.16004. PMC 9322464. PMID 35412019.
- ^ Pawlowski, J.; Lejzerowicz, F.; Esling, P. (2014-10-01). "Next-Generation Environmental Diversity Surveys of Foraminifera: Preparing the Future". The Biological Bulletin. 227 (2): 93–106. doi:10.1086/BBLv227n2p93. ISSN 0006-3185. PMID 25411369. S2CID 24388876.
- ^ Burki F, Keeling PJ (February 2014). "Rhizaria". Current Biology. 24 (3): R103–7. Bibcode:2014CBio...24.R103B. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.025. PMID 24502779.
- ^ Eikrem, Wenche; Medlin, Linda K.; Henderiks, Jorijntje; Rokitta, Sebastian; Rost, Björn; et al. (2017). "Haptophyta". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 2 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 893–954. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_38. ISBN 978-3-319-28147-6.
- ^ Guiry, Michael D. (2024). "How many species of algae are there? A reprise. Four kingdoms, 14 phyla, 63 classes and still growing". Journal of Phycology. 60 (2): 214–228. doi:10.1111/jpy.13431. PMID 38245909.
- ^ Cavalier-Smith, Thomas; von der Heyden, Sophie (2007). "Molecular phylogeny, scale evolution and taxonomy of centrohelid heliozoa". Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 44 (3): 1186–1203. Bibcode:2007MolPE..44.1186C. doi:10.1016/j.ympev.2007.04.019. PMID 17588778.
- ^ Hoef-Emden, Kerstin; Archibald, John M. (2017). "Cryptophyta (Cryptomonads)". In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 2 (2nd ed.). Springer. pp. 851–892. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_35. ISBN 978-3-319-28147-6.
- ^ a b Cavalier-Smith, Thomas (May 2013). "Early evolution of eukaryote feeding modes, cell structural diversity, and classification of the protozoan phyla Loukozoa, Sulcozoa, and Choanozoa". European Journal of Protistology. 49 (2): 115–178. doi:10.1016/j.ejop.2012.06.001.
- ^ a b Weston, Elizabeth J.; Eglit, Yana; Simpson, Alastair G.B. (2023). "Kaonashia insperata gen. et sp. nov., a eukaryotrophic flagellate, represents a novel major lineage of heterotrophic stramenopiles". Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology. 71 (1): e13003. doi:10.1111/jeu.13003. PMID 37803921.
- ^ a b Williamson, Kelsey; Eme, Laura; Baños, Hector; McCarthy, Charley G. P.; Susko, Edward; et al. (24 April 2025). "A robustly rooted tree of eukaryotes reveals their excavate ancestry". Nature. 640 (8060): 974–981. doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08709-5.
- ^ Eliáš, Marek (2021). "Protist diversity: Novel groups enrich the algal tree of life". Current Biology. 31 (11): R733 – R735. Bibcode:2021CBio...31.R733E. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.025. PMID 34102125. Retrieved 13 May 2025.
- ^ Mackiewicz, Paweł; Bodył, Andrzej; Gagat, Przemysław (2012). "Possible import routes of proteins into the cyanobacterial endosymbionts/plastids of Paulinella chromatophora" (PDF). Theory in Biosciences. 131 (1): 1–18. doi:10.1007/s12064-011-0147-7. ISSN 1431-7613. PMC 3334493. PMID 22209953. Retrieved 3 July 2025.
- ^ a b Pietluch, Filip; Mackiewicz, Paweł; Ludwig, Kacper; Gagat, Przemysław (3 September 2024). "A New Model and Dating for the Evolution of Complex Plastids of Red Alga Origin". Genome Biology and Evolution. 16 (9: evae192). doi:10.1093/gbe/evae192. PMC 11413572. PMID 39240751.
- ^ Gast, Rebecca J. (2017). "Centrohelida and Other Heliozoan-Like Protists" (PDF). In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 2 (2nd ed.). Cham: Springer International Publishing. p. 955–971. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_28. ISBN 978-3-319-28149-0. LCCN 2017945328. Retrieved 9 June 2025.
- ^ Nikolaev, Sergey I.; Berney, Cédric; Fahrni, José F.; Bolivar, Ignacio; Polet, Stephane; Mylnikov, Alexander P.; Aleshin, Vladimir V.; Petrov, Nikolai B.; Pawlowski, Jan (25 May 2004). "The twilight of Heliozoa and rise of Rhizaria, an emerging supergroup of amoeboid eukaryotes". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 101 (21): 8066–8071. doi:10.1073/pnas.0308602101. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 419558. PMID 15148395. Retrieved 9 June 2025.
- ^ a b Yazaki, Euki; Yabuki, Akinori; Imaizumi, Ayaka; Kume, Keitaro; Hashimoto, Tetsuo; Inagaki, Yuji (2022). "The closest lineage of Archaeplastida is revealed by phylogenomics analyses that include Microheliella maris". Open Biology. 12 (4): 210376. doi:10.1098/rsob.210376. PMC 9006020. PMID 35414259.
- ^ Shishkin, Yegor; Drachko, Daria; Zlatogursky, Vasily V. (22 April 2021). "The smallest known heliozoans are the Erebor lineage (nom. clad. n.) inside Microheliella maris (Eukaryota, Diaphoretickes), with the amendation of M. maris diagnosis and description of Berkeleyaesol magnus gen. nov., comb. nov. (Eukaryota, incertae sedis)". International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. 71 (4). doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.004776. ISSN 1466-5026.
- ^ Cavalier-Smith, Thomas (5 September 2017). "Kingdom Chromista and its eight phyla: a new synthesis emphasising periplastid protein targeting, cytoskeletal and periplastid evolution, and ancient divergences". Protoplasma. 255 (1): 297–357. doi:10.1007/s00709-017-1147-3. PMC 5756292. PMID 28875267.
- ^ Burki, Fabien; Okamoto, Noriko; Pombert, Jean-François; Keeling, Patrick J. (2012). "The evolutionary history of haptophytes and cryptophytes: phylogenomic evidence for separate origins". Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 279 (1736): 2246–2254. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.2301. PMC 3321700. PMID 22298847.
- ^ Yazaki, Euki; Yabuki, Akinori; Nishimura, Yuki; Shiratori, Takashi; Hashimoto, Tetsuo; Inagaki, Yuji (4 November 2022). "Microheliella maris possesses the most gene-rich mitochondrial genome in Diaphoretickes". Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 10: 1030570. doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.1030570. ISSN 2296-701X.
- ^ a b c d Torruella, Guifré; Galindo, Luis Javier; Moreira, David; López-García, Purificación (6 January 2025). "Phylogenomics of neglected flagellated protists supports a revised eukaryotic tree of life". Current Biology. 35 (1): 198–207.e4. Bibcode:2025CBio...35..198T. bioRxiv 10.1101/2024.05.15.594285. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2024.10.075. ISSN 1879-0445. PMID 39642877.
- ^ a b c Eglit, Yana; Shiratori, Takashi; Jerlström-Hultqvist, Jon; Williamson, Kelsey; Roger, Andrew J.; Ishida, Ken-Ichiro; Simpson, Alastair G.B. (22 January 2024). "Meteora sporadica, a protist with incredible cell architecture, is related to Hemimastigophora". Current Biology. 34 (2): 451–459.e6. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2023.12.032. Retrieved 15 June 2025.
- ^ a b Čepička, Ivan; Valt, Marek; Pánek, Tomáš; Mirzoyan, Seda; Tice, Alexander; Jones, Robert; Dohnálek, Vít; Dolezal, Pavel; Mikšátko, Jiří; Rotterová, Johana; Hrubá, Pavla; Brown, Matthew (15 May 2025). "Rare microbial relict sheds light on an ancient eukaryotic supergroup (PREPRINT Version 1)". Research Square. doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-5245440/v1.
- ^ Lax, Gordon; Eglit, Yana; Eme, Laura; Bertrand, Erin M.; Roger, Andrew J.; Simpson, Alastair G. B. (2018). "Hemimastigophora is a novel supra-kingdom-level lineage of eukaryotes". Nature. 564 (7736): 410–414. Bibcode:2018Natur.564..410L. doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0708-8. S2CID 205570993.
- ^ Schön, Max E.; Zlatogursky, Vasily V.; Singh, Rohan P.; Poirier, Camille; Wilken, Susanne; et al. (17 November 2021). "Single cell genomics reveals plastid-lacking Picozoa are close relatives of red algae" (PDF). Nature Communications. 12 (1): 6651. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26918-0. ISSN 2041-1723. PMC 8599508. PMID 34789758. Retrieved 2 July 2025.
- ^ Simpson, Alastair G. B.; Slamovits, Claudio H.; Archibald, John M. (2017). "Protist Diversity and Eukaryote Phylogeny" (PDF). In Archibald, John M.; Simpson, Alastair G.B.; Slamovits, Claudio H. (eds.). Handbook of the Protists. Vol. 1 (2nd ed.). Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 1–22. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28149-0_45. ISBN 978-3-319-28149-0. LCCN 2017945328.