Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2025-05-01/Arbitration report
Discuss this story
- Something about the tone of this feels weird. it's lio! | talk | work 09:29, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
- The ArbCom action or the reporting? If the latter, I agree: something about the grammar felt vaguely....AI-ish? The use of "the ArbCom" in the title, when we almost always colloquially use just "ArbCom" to reference the group by the diminutive name, the use of the past perfect in the opening sentence. Then again, the more likely explanation is that it was just slightly hastily composed and one's brain begins to ascribe every little typo or minor grammatical error/idiosyncrasy to AI these days. SnowRise let's rap 04:57, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- The reporting, yes..."hastily composed" would be a problem, since the final version should always be well proofread before being published to the public. Still, whatever. it's lio! | talk | work 06:09, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
- Not really. That title was placed at the initial revision of this article, more than 48 hours before publication. No AI was in the loop, as far as I'm aware. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:47, 11 May 2025 (UTC)
- The ArbCom action or the reporting? If the latter, I agree: something about the grammar felt vaguely....AI-ish? The use of "the ArbCom" in the title, when we almost always colloquially use just "ArbCom" to reference the group by the diminutive name, the use of the past perfect in the opening sentence. Then again, the more likely explanation is that it was just slightly hastily composed and one's brain begins to ascribe every little typo or minor grammatical error/idiosyncrasy to AI these days. SnowRise let's rap 04:57, 10 May 2025 (UTC)
I'm really pleased to see the ArbCom report and centralised discussion summaries returning to the Signpost. I want to keep up with these events but don't have the time to read through pages upon pages of discussion so these summaries are incredibly useful. WaggersTALK 10:58, 2 May 2025 (UTC)
← Back to Arbitration report