Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Law/Assessment/Archive

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is an archive of requests for assessment.

  1. J.D. -- Zoticogrillo (talk) 05:00, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. SCO-Linux controversies -- should be checked for neutrality and legal accuracy. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 02:01, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Inslaw -- request legal opinion on accuracy of article in reference to final determination of Inslaw Inc. v. United States Government Anne Teedham (talk) 14:55, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Court of Common Pleas (England); request a re-assessment after I massively expanded and referenced it. Any help available to push it to GA would be appreciated; I think it can get there :). Ironholds 00:44, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Speed limits in the United States --unassessed by this project Synchronism (talk) 03:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Speed limit --completely unassessed Synchronism (talk) 03:19, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  7. Lawsuits to Overturn Proposition 8 --unassessed --Joe Decker (talk) 06:16, 26 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  8. John Ordronaux (doctor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views). This is an interesting one that I have been helping a new, but very talented, editor write. My input has been on the technical aspects - linking, refs etc. It is, I think, clearly C class, but we would like to get it up to at least B class. Requesting a review from the Project. Thank you. – ukexpat (talk) 22:44, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Gorgoroth name dispute -- documents the name dispute concerning the black metal band Gorgoroth which set a legal precedent in Norway Dark Prime (talk) 00:12, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. King_Kong_defence (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) -- The talk page (linked from "start class articles") is now an orphan because the content of King Kong defence has been merged into the Pirate Bay Trial. Should be de-listed from start-class articles since it is no longer an article. FrumpyTheClown (talk) 05:16, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. In re: Gill -- Viciouslies (talk) 21:57, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. Common Heritage of Mankind -- NimbusWeb (talk) 09:36, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. A&M Records, Inc. v. Napster, Inc. -- Agreatnotion (talk) 17:06, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  14. Cousin marriage Currently a dispute between the main author and myself about what to rate it. See project talk page for more info. Cdtew (talk) 23:16, 25 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  15. I did a longer translation of Roermond witch trial. Please reassess. Discworldian (talk) 17:00, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Standard State Zoning Enabling Act - added some information from the American Planning Association and new links to expanded articles. Requesting upgrade from Stub to Start. Wikihelper68 (talk) 00:22, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Sociology of law I have expanded, revised and structured the entry on the Sociology of law. Please reassess it.
  18. Tucker v. Texas I have significantly revised the article and structure. Please reassess. GregJackP Boomer! 18:53, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  19. Appropriate adult I have revised and added references to this article, please reassess. Hopefully gone from stub to at least start class Xmp (talk) 00:59, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    C- class. Bearian (talk) 14:28, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Western Shoshone Claims Distribution Act of 2004 TheNgeveld 14:41, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  21. R v Brownhouse -- Stellas4lunch (talk) 23:28, 18 May 2011 (UTC) )[reply]
  22. money laundering -- lots of changes since last assessed (I think) Thanks! high importance Wiki33139 (talk) 15:57, 19 September 2011 (UTC) Never mind -- just been reassessed -- thanks hardboiledeggs Wiki33139 (talk) 00:40, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  23. New Zealand nationality law - needs importance re-assessed. Bonus bon (talk) 20:28, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Bankruptcy in the Republic of Ireland the importance rating of this article might be rasssessed in light ot the High rating given to Bankruptcy in the United Kingdom and the comments on demographics below. Thanks FrankFlanagan (talk) 14:24, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  25. Circuit split -- Notecardforfree (talk) 18:47, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  26. Schmerber v. California -- Notecardforfree (talk) 09:32, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  27. Address confidentiality program --Natalie Bueno Vasquez (talk) 20:11, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  28. Terry stop -- Seahawk01 (talk) 03:17, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Re-assessed as a B-Class. See Talk:Terry stop. Bearian (talk) 01:52, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  29. In re TRENDnet, Inc. -- WelpThatWorked (talk) 19:21, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  30. Corporate average fuel economy -- Besselfunctions (talk) 22:28, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  31. Trading with the Enemy Act of 1917 has been edited and expanded. Please review.Zimm82 (talk) 03:47, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  32. Common law -- BostonBowTie (talk) 21:28, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  33. Power of acceptance -- Wickedwikiuser (talk) 00:32, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  34. Public Prosecutors Office (Japan) Ominae (talk) 02:04, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Judiciary of Russia - rated C-class. Bearian (talk) 14:17, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  36. Scienter -- Z. Patterson (talk) 01:44, 27 February 2025 (UTC) - Rated C-class. See the talk page for an assessment of a potential B-class. Bearian (talk) 14:13, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Costs (English law) -- D-Notice (talk) 11:04, 26 June 2013 (UTC) - This is still a C-class article; see the talk page for more information. Bearian (talk) 14:26, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  38. Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy -- Bdushaw (talk) 05:11, 4 September 2014 (UTC) - sticking with a B-class. Bearian (talk) 14:45, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  39. Environmental law -- Ado2102 (talk) 23:30, 29 September 2014 (UTC) - still a C-class. Bearian (talk) 14:49, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  40. Legal awareness -- Mahitgar (talk) 01:58, 22 November 2014 (UTC) - stuck at C-class; see the discussions on its talk page. Bearian (talk) 14:53, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  41. Sheriff Appeal Court -- Davidkinnen (talk) 11:41, 10 April 2018 (UTC) - upgraded to a B-class. Bearian (talk) 16:42, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  42. Vagueness doctrine -- Fluffy89502 (talk) 01:54, 22 April 2019 (UTC) -- upgraded to a C-class, with 7 actionable suggestions for improving it to a B-class on the article's talk page. Bearian (talk) 22:59, 21 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  43. coram nobis -- Chipermc (talk) 04:20, 21 July 2016 (UTC) : Comment: Rated a B- class. Being evaluated for GA status. Please be patient. Bearian (talk) 17:32, 21 March 2025 (UTC) -- Archived for lack of responses. Bearian (talk) 01:40, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  44. Article 35A of Constitution of India --- TylerDurden10 (talk) 22:33, 4 April 2017 (UTC) : Comment: Rated Class C. Not technically a B yet. Please find an image, map, or graphic. Pinging TylerDurden10 and will cross-post. Bearian (talk) 17:39, 21 March 2025 (UTC) -- Archived for lack of responses. Bearian (talk) 01:40, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  45. Measures for Justice -- Created, could be a C but would like vetted against criteria for a B Nosebagbear (talk) 22:13, 5 September 2019 (UTC) -- Completed; see Talk:Measures for Justice for assessment at B-Class. Sorry for the delay. Pinging Nosebagbear if they're still around. Bearian (talk) 01:44, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  46. Home Depot U. S. A., Inc. v. Jackson -- ExParte talk 23:59, 4 September 2020 (UTC) Sorry, Ex Parte, this failed GA in 2020, and I think it's still stuck at a B-Class. Review the talk page comments over the past four years, make the suggested improvements, and apply again. Bearian (talk) 03:31, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  47. Tag-along right -- SobrietySoba (talk) 13:21, 9 December 2020 (UTC) - SobrietySoba, I assessed this as a B-Class article based on having all of both B- and C-Class criteria. I raised it from a C to a B. Thanks for your patience. Bearian (talk) 03:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  48. Thomas Michael Whalen III - I created this stub, and it has been edited extensively by his family, friends, allies, critics, and political adversaries. I knew him personally. It's predicted to be C-Class by User:Nettrom/sandbox/WikiProject Law stub predictions. Can we please get an involved editor to assess this as either a Start- or C-Class article? -- Bearian (talk) 15:41, 4 April 2025 (UTC) -- I did it myself. Bearian (talk) 03:28, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  49. Supreme People's Procuratorate -- Frangipani13 (talk) 23:59, 27 May 2021 (UTC) -- Assessed as B-Class and Mid-important by JBchrch on June 3, 2021. Bearian (talk) 00:54, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  50. China–Australia Migratory Bird Agreement -- JerryH7 (talk)JerryH7 (talk) 08:21, 28 May 2021 (UTC) -- Re-assessed as a B-Class. Bearian (talk) 01:00, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  51. Edict of Amboise -- Sovietblobfish (talk) 10:47, 5 June 2021 (UTC) -- Already assessed as a B-Class article. Bearian (talk) 01:05, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  52. Edict of Saint-Germain -- Sovietblobfish (talk) 10:47, 5 June 2021 (UTC) -- Alteady assessed as a B-Class. Bearian (talk) 01:07, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  53. Henry R. Horsey -- Heartmusic678 (talk) 17:29, 22 June 2021 (UTC) -- Kept as a C-Class. For it to be a B-Class, 3 things must be added: (1) a photograph of the subject, or an image representing his work, such as a court house he appeared in; (2) the long paragraph of his biography needs to be cut up and properly cited; and (3) add a reliable source for his death. Best of luck. Will cross-post if possible. Bearian (talk) 01:15, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  54. Lalitha Kanneganti -- Acrobat248 (talk) 10:40, 22 August 2021 (UTC) -- Assessed as a Start-Class. To get to a B-Class, a proper photograph and many citations need to be added. -- Bearian (talk) 01:24, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  55. British Post Office scandal -- Jacksoncowes (talk) 06:41, 23 August 2021 (UTC) -- Already assessed as a B-Class article, this is as high as we can get it here. Bearian (talk) 01:27, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  56. Commonwealth v Introvigne -- Mako001 (talk) 12:53, 14 December 2021 (UTC) -- Assessed as a B-Class, which is as high as we can take it. Bearian (talk) 01:32, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  57. John Lewis Voting Rights Act -- aaronneallucas (talk) 00:37, 9 January 2022 (UTC) -- Assessed as a B-Class by Vaticidalprophet. That's as high as we can get it. Bearian (talk) 01:43, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  58. Clifton Newman -- Philipnelson99 (talk) 16:36, 31 January 2023 (UTC) -- I'm assessing this as a B-Class. The sticking point for this to get beyond a C-Class seems to be the lack of a free-use image of the subject. That is not required for a B! The relevant criteria is "5. The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. Illustrations are encouraged, though not required." I added four images. The images do not need to be of the subject, but can be representative of the cases and court houses where he worked as a judge. Bearian (talk) 02:05, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  59. Fugitive Felon Act -- Eithersummer (talk) 1:51, 4 June 2023 (UTC) -- Already assessed as a B-class on April 3. Bearian (talk) 03:33, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  60. John Lauro -- 4theloveofallthings (talk) 16:08, 3 August 2023 (UTC) -- This was Redirected to Federal prosecution of Donald Trump (election obstruction case), so no assessment is needed. Bearian (talk) 03:28, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  61. Swedenburg v. Kelly -- It was created (not by me) as a Stub-class article, but surely it has enough information to be ranked higher? DeemDeem52 (talk) 17:06, 17 March 2025 (UTC) -- BusterTheMighty recently assessed this as a Start-Class article. Bearian (talk) 03:32, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  62. Case of the Swans -- is this a stub or a Start? Bearian (talk) 17:43, 21 March 2025 (UTC) -- I went ahead and assessed it as a Start. Bearian (talk) 01:40, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  63. Perkins Coie - Given recent presidential action against it.--agr (talk) 12:10, 25 March 2025 (UTC) -- I'm keeping the quality assessment as a B-Class. If you want to get a GA analysis, ArnoldReinhold, there's a whole process. No opinion on its importance. Bearian (talk) 01:46, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  64. Doubt (American TV series) -- I assessed this as a start, missing an image and citations, but could be a B-Class article if those two things were added. It is predicted to be a C-Class article by User:Nettrom/sandbox/WikiProject Law stub predictions. Can we please get an involved editor to assess this as either a B-Class article or GA? -- Bearian (talk) 16:00, 4 April 2025 (UTC) I assessed this as a C. Bearian (talk) 03:13, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  65. Sageworks -- It has been proposed or nominated for deletion four times, yet this lives on. Is it a Stub or Start? -- Bearian (talk) 01:37, 6 April 2025 (UTC) I assessed this as a Start. Bearian (talk) 03:13, 20 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  66. Helaine M. Barnett -- I would assess it, but she refused to even consider me for a job. Bearian (talk) 07:52, 13 March 2025 (UTC) I assessed this as a Start. Bearian (talk) 07:56, 26 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  67. Deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia -- Turning into a major constitutional crisis. Could use some outside eyes on it. -- Bob drobbs (talk) 18:35, 14 April 2025 (UTC) -- Assessed as B-Class and High-importance. Will keep an eye on it. -- Bearian (talk) 10:09, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Law/Assessment/Archive&oldid=1292305416"