Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2025 April 10

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:20, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is transcluded on Microsoft Outlook, but none of the listed versions are what the article is about (which is the paid program on Windows and Mac). The first belongs to Outlook for Windows. The others belong to Microsoft Outlook (mobile app). MSMST1543 (talk) 23:32, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rather than just transcluding it into the articles you mentioned, you thought it was quicker to nominate it for deletion? Keep it since it is now transcluded on all three articles. ―Eduardogobi (talk) 03:54, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Eduardogobi: It should not be transcluded into those other articles either since the template lists both Outlook for Windows and Microsoft Outlook (mobile app) even though they have separate articles. MSMST1543 (talk) 06:53, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:21, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unused and no main article as link is a redirect and had no notability in the first place. No need for navbox. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:06, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:20, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No transclusions or incoming links. Created in November 2024. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:08, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TLAint and similar templates

[edit]
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 23:20, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No documentation or incoming links for any of these cryptically named templates. Created in January 2025. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:04, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or at the very least merge. Template:BCSint was previously nominated and kept after being used, but that template is used on a single article. The only difference between all of these seem to be the |region= value. That is not a reason to create dozens of the same exact template. Gonnym (talk) 07:41, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Also, creating a single template without documentation and using it in main space is bad. Creating dozens in mass with no documentation should land a user with a temp topic block in my opinion. Gonnym (talk) 07:42, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more templates or modules. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. plicit 03:13, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All but one of the links redirected to the same article (Star Wars: Republic Commando). The remaining article, Star Wars Battlefront II (2017 video game), doesn't have any indication that the game is part of the "Republic Commando" series. Mika1h (talk) 17:59, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. QuietHere (talk | contributions) 07:22, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template or module's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.