Wikipedia:Peer review/Syriac Orthodox Church/archive4

Syriac Orthodox Church

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion is closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because it has been a while since the last review. Me and @Warriorglance would like to send it to GAN and could use the feedback. Any specific advice would be very useful!

Thanks, CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 16:43, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will do this one. History6042😊 (Contact me) 14:46, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All images should have alt text
All online sources should be archived.
On reference 47, there is a Harv error that says: link from CITEREFDonabedMako doesn't point to any citation.
There are more of these harv errors. CITEREFAkgündüz2012, CITEREFArmbruster2002, CITEREFAtto2014, CITEREFAydin2000, CITEREFBardakciFreyberg-InanGieselLeisse2017, CITEREFBarsoum2008, etc. I would suggest installing User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors.js
The article mixes using SFNs and full references please only use one.
The lede should have no references as they should be in the article.
There are three unreferenced paragraphs.
Ping when done. History6042😊 (Contact me) 14:54, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Will do it. Warriorglance(talk to me) 15:08, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! CF-501 Falcon (talk · contribs) 00:54, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@History6042 We have to use SFNs and full references as some are websites while others are books. Also, I don't think mixing them in the 'References' section is against the policies. Is it? Warriorglance(talk to me) 07:24, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I think it is fine, I am just unfamiliar with SFNs but I guess its fine. History6042😊 (Contact me) 20:00, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]