Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Venezuelan crisis of 1895/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Consensus to delist in the absence of anyone interested in making the necessary fixes for retention as a good article. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 20:50, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
This article has several uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Z1720 (talk) 01:12, 6 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delist no progress to address concerns. Z1720 (talk) 15:32, 7 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delist, I guess. I'm not entirely sold on some of the CN tags - "partly to defend claims to the Caratal goldfield of the region's Yuruari basin, which was within Venezuelan territory but claimed by the British" was sourced at the time of the original promotion - has somebody actually determined this isn't in the source or is it a drive-by tag. But the unsourced aftermath content is post-promotion additions but seems relevant so I don't think outright removal of content is the answer. With nobody familiar with the subject stepping up to work on it, I reckon this will need to be delisted. Hog Farm talk 16:54, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.