Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/The Wild Bunch/1
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result pending
Uncited statements, including entire paragraphs. Unreliable sources used, like IMDB. Z1720 (talk) 21:42, 13 July 2025 (UTC)
I think the article is probably fixable if anyone is willing to put in the time and effort, but WP:LEADCITE and WP:COATRACK is yet another minor issue that needs to be cleaned up. -- 109.76.132.191 (talk) 17:08, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
- LEADCITE allows citations in the lead, but I do not think "Regarded as one of the greatest films of all time," should have 10 inline citations in the lead to verify the information. Z1720 (talk) 18:57, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
- Allows, but does not require (but essentially encourages editors not to put citations in the lead section unless they absolutely need to). Editors have gotten much better at writing high quality articles and making it clear the summary in the lead section is clearly well supported by the article body. I would hope the citations could be moved out of the lead section and down into the article body. I would expect that editors would be able to manage it with further improvements to Reception section, but properly moving the information down into the article takes a bit more care and attention than casually removing citations from the lead (if it was an easy fix I'd have done it already). -- 109.76.135.66 (talk) 13:52, 15 July 2025 (UTC)