Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Swaminarayan Akshardham (Delhi)/1
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result pending
Multiple uncited statements. There's a whole Guinness World Records section, which is badly written. There should probably be some kind of reception section where this, along with criticism and praise of the temple should be put. The article also appears to be over-reliant on primary sources. There are multiple peacock words like "intricate" and "ornate", and the whole exhibits section has a promotional tone. I don't think the article is neutral, sufficiently verifiable, or well written. KnowDeath (talk) 20:37, 18 July 2025 (UTC)