Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Ovulatory shift hypothesis/1
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result pending
There is uncited text in the article, including entire paragraphs. Some statements have been tagged with "medical citation needed" since 2021. The lead does not summarise all major aspects of the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:14, 17 June 2025 (UTC)
- I engaged on talk way back in 2021 (my comments can be seen there). The article is based on primary and non-independent sources, and rife with SYNTH, and there's possibly a student editing conflict with promoters of the hypothesis. I found a lot of deeper problems, but then never had time to return to spell them all out. The article should not be GA. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:06, 21 June 2025 (UTC)