Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/2024 Men's T20 World Cup qualification/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 7 July 2025 (UTC) [1].[reply]
2024 Men's T20 World Cup qualification (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Vestrian24Bio 03:19, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the final FLC in the 2024 Men's T20 World Cup topic; I might take an extended break from en-wiki after this closes, so cheers to the last one (for now).Not anymore... Vestrian24Bio 03:19, 5 May 2025 (UTC) – 13:06, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Source review and additional notes.
[edit]- It's been 15 days and no reviews, I think you might have poisoned you nomination by advertising your exit, anyways I'll be the first to put the knife in your tenure.
- Alot of inconsistency weather a source is linked or not
- Alot of inconsistency weather sources use DMY or slash dates
- Refs 31 and 58 have MOS:DASH violations
- Some sources are showing up as dead despite being alive (56-58) for example, they need to be marked as being alive.
- Spots checks flag nothing
- Why is "Emerging Cricket" reliable?
- Why is "Czarsportz" reliable?
- That's what I found ping me when done, and if you do plan to take a wikibreak after this, thanks for all the fish. Olliefant (she/her) 02:43, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @OlifanofmrTennant: Hi! thanks for the review, I was going to take a break but, things have changed now for good..
- Emerging Cricket is a reliable site for Associate Cricket news; not sure if it has been discussed in WP:RSN though.
- Czarsportz is the highest reliable independent source we have for associate cricket.
- All else done..! Vestrian24Bio 13:06, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @OlifanofmrTennant: Hi! thanks for the review, I was going to take a break but, things have changed now for good..
Comments from Z1720
[edit]Image review: No concerns.
Prose review:
- What reference is verifying the information in the "Summary of the qualification process" table? This should be made clear somewhere.
- What reference is verifying the information in the "Details of the teams qualified for the T20 World Cup" table?
- Suggest archiving sources using IA Bot.
Those are my thoughts. Z1720 (talk) 18:43, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @Z1720: done. Vestrian24Bio 16:22, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Concerns addressed and resolved. Z1720 (talk) 16:31, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
History6042
[edit]- Cant't find anything against the criteria, support. History6042😊 (Contact me) 15:12, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support from Easternsahara
[edit]- I couldn't find anything wrong with the list, seems to meet all the criteria
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:07, 6 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.