Wikipedia:Featured article review/Pre-dreadnought battleship/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was delisted by DrKay via FACBot (talk) 8:00, 16 February 2025 (UTC) [1].
- Notified: The Land, Blackeagle, Nigel Ish, Parsecboy, WP MILHIST, WP Ships, noticed January 2023
Review section
[edit]Sadly, this key Operation Majestic Titan article is no longer at the current standards. I voiced concerns on the article's talk page over a year and a half ago, but the only activity there since has been an IP raising minor accuracy concerns. As a MILHIST regular, I regret having to take this here, but I lack the sources and subject matter knowledge to resolve this concerns myself. Hopefully the outcome of Wikipedia:Featured article review/Ironclad warship/archive1 can be avoided. Hog Farm Talk 22:53, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I just skimmed the article's sourcing and agree that there are major formatting issues for the cites and bibliography. I can fix all that pretty easily. I'll see what more needs to be done after I do that and look at your comments on the talk page.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 00:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Man, I just started trying to figure out which actual book goes with some of the cites and I can't match them up! Furthermore, some of the pages cited don't relate to the material cited at all. I just deleted them and will cite them properly as I find time.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 02:24, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Sturm, is that work that you anticipate could be done within FAR? Nikkimaria (talk) 17:22, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I think so; I'll try not to drag it out as long as I did for Wisconsin and Missouri.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:58, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Sturm, is that work that you anticipate could be done within FAR? Nikkimaria (talk) 17:22, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Sturm, any update on status here? Nikkimaria (talk) 14:41, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm in the process of moving, so little to nothing until December--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 09:18, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Sturm, any update on status here? Nikkimaria (talk) 14:41, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi @Nikkimaria, I intend to work on this. On my read through I see 20 small paragraphs which don't have citations. Also, there are a few long paragraphs which only have 1 citation, so I will try to add more. Matarisvan (talk) 14:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Matarisvan, are you still intending to work on this? Nikkimaria (talk) 20:54, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Nikkimaria, I do, but it will take me some time, since a GA reassessment is taking up too much of it. I think it could be closed today, and if it is, I expect to be done with this rewrite in 30 days. I hope that is not too long. Matarisvan (talk) 17:29, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Matarisvan, are you still intending to work on this? Nikkimaria (talk) 20:54, 7 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As a slightly random drive by comment, the 'Survivors' section should note that only the outer structure of Mikasa survives: the interior of the ship, its armament, etc, were scrapped under the terms of Japan's surrender in 1945. The museum inside the ship has some photos showing that it was essentially reduced to nothing. The ship was cheaply and poorly restored to resemble its previous external appearance in the 1950s or 1960s. Nick-D (talk) 01:06, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
FARC section
[edit]- Stalled. Nikkimaria (talk) 19:21, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist The article does not meet FA standards and progress is not being made to fix the various problems. Nick-D (talk) 00:58, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist Too much uncited. Z1720 (talk) 04:56, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - sourcing issues. Hog Farm Talk 05:29, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist - agree its not sufficiently sourced LeChatiliers Pupper (talk) 05:39, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. DrKay (talk) 08:00, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.