Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
The comment the reviewer left was:
Issues include:
"She is an internationally recognized expert" Says whom?
"She is a leader in learning design, educational technology, and human-computer interaction. Say whom?
"As a cross-culturally competent researcher and designer, she emphasizes the importance of examining problems from multiple perspectives to avoid oversimplification and produce solutions that work best for users. We can't include our own analysis in articles, see wp:no original research.
Please add attribution for the opinions.
In addition, this draft is sourced to only non-independent sources(that is, sources that affiliated with the subject), contributing to the WP:NPOV problem.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ana-Paula Correia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Hello, Zackbatzaya!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Catalk to me!13:37, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ana-Paula Correia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Moritoriko was:
too much of the article is currently sourced to her own biography on the school website. Is there a source that isn't her own websites for any of this information? The first paragraph of Research also smells like OR because the only citations are papers she has done, nothing saying that the topics are related or what her focus is? Also selected publications should be underneath awards.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ana-Paula Correia and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
I included the birth date in the cited text. It's a birth date, so it may not always be readily available online for citation because it's sensitive information. Thank you and I hope you understand. Zackbatzaya (talk) 15:10, 29 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
