User talk:Yak-indolog

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jaroslav Čejka (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jaroslav Čejka and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:02, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yak~cswiki, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:02, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jaroslav Čejka

Hello, Yak~cswiki. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Jaroslav Čejka".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 18:43, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jaroslav Čejka concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jaroslav Čejka, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jaroslav Čejka

Hello, Yak~cswiki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jaroslav Čejka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Linguist^un Eins ^uno 11:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Yak-indolog, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum, see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome!

Qalb alasid (talk) 23:25, 22 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Classification of Arabic languages. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 16:58, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Antoine, describing what you did is not an attack. I would appreciate if you'd bother to explain why you just dumped a complete edit (with several corrections) instead of taking the "work" and removing the one term you found redundant. This "one-click laziness does disservice to the project, as users are unnecessarilly deprived of a correction (the point was that Old Arabic is not Classical Arabic, which misinformation was returned to the page by you) and editors deterred from investing work next time. Yak Yak-indolog (talk) 22:13, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"The person must have been drunk or drugged" and "do it yourself, when you get sober" are personal attacks. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 16:08, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]