Jump to content

User talk:Yaheloren

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Yaheloren, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 16:24, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Limy AI (June 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:
This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 15:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Yaheloren! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 15:37, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Limy AI

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Limy AI, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 16:20, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Limy AI (June 17)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 16:24, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.
If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jimfbleak - talk to me? 16:42, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Yaheloren (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the concern about promotional content. I was attempting to draft a page about a company, Limy AI, using a neutral tone and citing multiple reliable, independent sources (e.g., Business Insider, WSJ). I now realize that my draft may have appeared too focused on promotion or lacked sufficient context. I’m happy to make revisions that align with Wikipedia’s notability and neutrality policies, and to work collaboratively with editors. I kindly request reconsideration so I can improve the draft and contribute constructively. Thank you. Yaheloren (talk) 06:28, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I understand the concern about promotional content. I was attempting to draft a page about a company, Limy AI, using a neutral tone and citing multiple reliable, independent sources (e.g., Business Insider, WSJ). I now realize that my draft may have appeared too focused on promotion or lacked sufficient context. I’m happy to make revisions that align with Wikipedia’s notability and neutrality policies, and to work collaboratively with editors. I kindly request reconsideration so I can improve the draft and contribute constructively. Thank you. [[User:Yaheloren|Yaheloren]] ([[User talk:Yaheloren#top|talk]]) 06:28, 18 June 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand the concern about promotional content. I was attempting to draft a page about a company, Limy AI, using a neutral tone and citing multiple reliable, independent sources (e.g., Business Insider, WSJ). I now realize that my draft may have appeared too focused on promotion or lacked sufficient context. I’m happy to make revisions that align with Wikipedia’s notability and neutrality policies, and to work collaboratively with editors. I kindly request reconsideration so I can improve the draft and contribute constructively. Thank you. [[User:Yaheloren|Yaheloren]] ([[User talk:Yaheloren#top|talk]]) 06:28, 18 June 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand the concern about promotional content. I was attempting to draft a page about a company, Limy AI, using a neutral tone and citing multiple reliable, independent sources (e.g., Business Insider, WSJ). I now realize that my draft may have appeared too focused on promotion or lacked sufficient context. I’m happy to make revisions that align with Wikipedia’s notability and neutrality policies, and to work collaboratively with editors. I kindly request reconsideration so I can improve the draft and contribute constructively. Thank you. [[User:Yaheloren|Yaheloren]] ([[User talk:Yaheloren#top|talk]]) 06:28, 18 June 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Yaheloren (talk) 06:28, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What is your relationship with Limy AI? If you have some other real-life connection with the company or the people behind it, or with eg. one of their competitors or partners, you have a conflict of interest (COI) which needs to be disclosed. And if you work for or with them, your COI is of the more specific kind, of paid editing, which needs to be disclosed in a particular way. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:19, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yaheloren&oldid=1296164507"