User talk:Xoof Schmoof
Hello, Xoof Schmoof, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Lizzie Waterworth, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.
Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.
New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
- Article development
- Standard layout
- Lead section
- The perfect article
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ~Liancetalk 17:14, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Lizzie Waterworth requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~Liancetalk 17:14, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lizzie Waterworth (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.‑ Iridescent 17:50, 18 March 2025 (UTC)
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Danger Mouse (1981 TV series). Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 18:42, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Can We Fix It? while logged out. Please be mindful not to perform controversial edits while logged out, or your account risks being blocked from editing. Please consider reading up on Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts before editing further. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 18:47, 23 March 2025 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Flintstones, you may be blocked from editing. The Grand Delusion(Send a message) 20:52, 27 March 2025 (UTC)

{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. PhilKnight (talk) 21:02, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
Xoof Schmoof (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I didn't mean to vandalise a few pages; I was only doing them for fun. The problem is that editing Fandom is more stricter than editing Wikipedia. I thought using George of the Jungle info on The Flinstones would seem funny. I know that there isn't a character in Skunk Fu! called Raccoon, but I only mentioned him to show that I dislike the character of Rabbit. Anyway, I was wondering why Perfect Peter's voice actress Emma Tate gets to have a WikiPage, but not Horrid Henry's? I'm also aggravated that Taylor Dooley (the actress behind the main female protagonist of Sharkboy and Lavagirl has got no Wikipedia page beyond a redirect so I want to give her one really badly! I'm terribly sorry for my immaturity PhilKnight. Can you still please unblock me and give me one more chance?
Decline reason:
"I didn't mean to vandalize...I was only doing them for fun." "Doing something for fun" on Wikipedia is vandalizing. Your likes and dislikes are not in the least bit relevant to Wikipedia. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 14:46, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
If this "He is a real character in the show! He is! Honestly!" Rabbit/Raccoon IP vandalism was you, yesterday, be aware that blocked users should not try to edit Wikipedia while logged out. This is classed as WP:BLOCKEVASION. --Belbury (talk) 09:29, 17 April 2025 (UTC)
- Unblock requests are to ask for a third party to review the block, but you addressed your request to the blocking admin. If you wish to negotiate with them first, you don't need to make an unblock request. 331dot (talk) 10:39, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Xoof Schmoof (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm terribly sorry for my irresponsible, immature behaviour on Wikipedia. It won't happen again. From now on, I'll try and be more careful on Wikipedia. Also, there are some articles I'd like to create (like I've just done with Lizzie Waterworth) and some I'd like to delete. If you can just give me a chance, please unblock me in a few days (but not weeks or months).
Decline reason:
I would want to see you address the alleged block evasion described above before considering unblocking you. 331dot (talk) 08:04, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Please place new comments at the bottom, so they stay in chronological order. 331dot (talk) 08:04, 28 April 2025 (UTC)