User talk:XJ-Hyper

This is XJ-Hyper's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jlwoodwa was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:XJ-Hyper/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

jlwoodwa (talk) 03:03, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, XJ-Hyper! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! jlwoodwa (talk) 03:03, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, welcome everyone!

Hi,hello!ΩΩΩXJ-Hyper (talk) 08:33, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

If you continue to make disruptive, trolling edits, you risk being blocked. Stop thanking other users for no reason at all other than apparently to amuse yourself.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:30, 6 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry,I will not do it again. XJ-Hyper (talk) 07:31, 7 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:XJ-Hyper/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:XJ-Hyper/sandbox, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Bbb23 (talk) 13:57, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Advert and COI warnings

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.
Hello, XJ-Hyper. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 14:17, 9 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tanjong Katong Primary School have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tanjong Katong Primary School was changed by XJ-Hyper (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886689 on 2025-04-11T12:47:41+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:47, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Punggol Cove Primary School

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Punggol Cove Primary School, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cooldudeseven7 _{join in on the tea talk} 12:47, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Punggol Cove Primary School

The article Punggol Cove Primary School has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a run-of-the-mill primary school. No coverage to establish notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whpq (talk) 13:29, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 13:42, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Punggol Cove Primary School for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Punggol Cove Primary School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punggol Cove Primary School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

ApexParagon (talk) 19:43, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Unblock

I would like to request an unblock. I now understand Wikipedia's guidelines and will make sure to follow them. I was trying to contribute about my school in good faith. Please give me a chance to edit constructively. XJ-Hyper (talk) 22:38, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Request for User XJ-Hyper

Hello, I understand the reason for my block. I was trying to contribute in good faith, but I see now that I misunderstood the rules. I am willing to follow Wikipedia’s guidelines moving forward. Could you please reconsider the block? Thank you for your time. XJ-Hyper (talk) 22:51, 11 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

XJ-Hyper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here XJ-Hyper (talk) 02:32, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Your reason here" is not a reason to unblock you, those words indicate where your reason should be located. If you intend your above statements as your request, these are far from sufficient. You need to specificially tell us what you did wrong, what you will do differently, and what productive contributions you will make if unblocked. 331dot (talk) 08:26, 12 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request for unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

XJ-Hyper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here XJ-Hyper (talk) 09:52, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear administrators,

I'm truly sorry for the mistake I made. I believe I was blocked because my article about Punggol Cove Primary School was too short. I understand now that it didn't meet Wikipedia's standards. But please know — I didn't mean any harm. I'm still new, and I was trying my best. My plan was to slowly build the article, adding a little each day, because I wanted it to be meaningful and accurate.

I love editing Wikipedia. It makes me feel like I can do something helpful for the world, even as a student. I especially enjoy writing about Singapore — the MRT, the buses, the schools — things I care deeply about. I just want to make Wikipedia better for everyone, even if it's one small edit at a time.

I've learned from this block, and I promise to be more careful. I'll make sure my edits are more complete, better sourced, and follow the guidelines. I hope you can give me one more chance to prove that I can be a good and responsible editor.

Thank you for reading this.

XJ-Hyper (talk) 09:52, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This reads like it was written by a chatbot. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:43, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request for unblock

This user is asking that her block be reviewed:

XJ-Hyper (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here XJ-Hyper (talk) 00:43, 27 April 2025 (UTC) Hi, I'm sorry for what I did. I think I got blocked because I created the Punggol Cove Primary School article with too little information. My plan was to slowly improve it, like writing a bit each day. I didn't know that short pages like that are not okay.[reply]

I'm still learning how to edit. I'm a new user, and I just wanted to help add more about Singapore things, like schools, MRTs, and buses. I now understand that pages must follow the rules and need good information.

If I get unblocked, I will try harder to follow the guidelines. I will only create pages when I have enough information and I will not make the same mistake again. Please give me one more chance.

Thank you.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Your reason here [[User:XJ-Hyper|XJ-Hyper]] ([[User talk:XJ-Hyper#top|talk]]) 00:43, 27 April 2025 (UTC) Hi, I'm sorry for what I did. I think I got blocked because I created the Punggol Cove Primary School article with too little information. My plan was to slowly improve it, like writing a bit each day. I didn't know that short pages like that are not okay.

I'm still learning how to edit. I'm a new user, and I just wanted to help add more about Singapore things, like schools, MRTs, and buses. I now understand that pages must follow the rules and need good information.

If I get unblocked, I will try harder to follow the guidelines. I will only create pages when I have enough information and I will not make the same mistake again. Please give me one more chance.

Thank you. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[User:XJ-Hyper|XJ-Hyper]] ([[User talk:XJ-Hyper#top|talk]]) 00:43, 27 April 2025 (UTC) Hi, I'm sorry for what I did. I think I got blocked because I created the Punggol Cove Primary School article with too little information. My plan was to slowly improve it, like writing a bit each day. I didn't know that short pages like that are not okay.

I'm still learning how to edit. I'm a new user, and I just wanted to help add more about Singapore things, like schools, MRTs, and buses. I now understand that pages must follow the rules and need good information.

If I get unblocked, I will try harder to follow the guidelines. I will only create pages when I have enough information and I will not make the same mistake again. Please give me one more chance.

Thank you. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Your reason here [[User:XJ-Hyper|XJ-Hyper]] ([[User talk:XJ-Hyper#top|talk]]) 00:43, 27 April 2025 (UTC) Hi, I'm sorry for what I did. I think I got blocked because I created the Punggol Cove Primary School article with too little information. My plan was to slowly improve it, like writing a bit each day. I didn't know that short pages like that are not okay.

I'm still learning how to edit. I'm a new user, and I just wanted to help add more about Singapore things, like schools, MRTs, and buses. I now understand that pages must follow the rules and need good information.

If I get unblocked, I will try harder to follow the guidelines. I will only create pages when I have enough information and I will not make the same mistake again. Please give me one more chance.

Thank you. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

XJ-Hyper (talk) 07:54, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

XJ-Hyper (talk) 00:43, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]