User talk:Wiper2001
Steven Broad
[edit]Hi @Wiper2001: I had to revert your work. It was unsourced and couldn't pass WP:V. Please take a look at WP:REFB which is a small video that explains how to create propers refs. scope_creepTalk 16:13, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- No problem, sorry, I was editing a page with the same name as the one I was creating. All sorted now. Sorry again! Wiper2001 (talk) 20:30, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
May 2025
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Steven Broad, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Jalen Barks (Woof) 18:05, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hello, I am not referring to Steven Broad that you are linking to. This is a different Steven Broad. The facts are written in a publication that I have referenced. So I am not sure how I have broken the rules. as I have the publication in front of me
- I also visited the URL that I referenced and all the details I have stated are there What am I doing wrong?
- . Wiper2001 (talk) 18:18, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
- Sorry, I see what was happening. It was accidentally editing another page with the same title.
- Regards! Wiper2001 (talk) 20:29, 20 May 2025 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Waxworker. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of ZX Spectrum games, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Waxworker (talk) 10:34, 22 May 2025 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Steve AJ Broad
[edit]Hello Wiper2001, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Steve AJ Broad, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve AJ Broad.
Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Vrxces}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 07:15, 25 May 2025 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mycat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.