User talk:Wikivro

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Tishreen07 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tishreen07. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:00, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wikivro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe I was blocked in error. I am not Tishreen07, nor am I using multiple accounts. I understand Wikipedia's sock puppetry policy, and I am editing only from this account. Please review the block. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Simple denial is insufficient. You need to address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tishreen07. Yamla (talk) 18:48, 23 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Wikivro (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that a simple denial is not sufficient, and I would like to address the concerns raised at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tishreen07.

Editing Interests: While I may have edited similar articles or topics as Tishreen07, this is because I have a genuine interest in insert your interest, e.g., Kurdish history, Middle Eastern topics, etc., which is not uncommon and does not imply sockpuppetry.

Editing Behavior: If there are behavioral similarities (such as formatting, language use, etc.), I assure you these are coincidental or based on common editing practices I learned from other editors and guidelines. I have never coordinated or shared an account with anyone.

Account Use: This is my only account. I have not used any other usernames or edited from alternate accounts/IPs with the intention of evading scrutiny or influencing discussions.

I respectfully request that the block be reconsidered in light of this information. I'm committed to contributing constructively to Wikipedia and following all policies, including those on sock puppetry. Wikivro (talk) 13:14, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I understand that a simple denial is not sufficient, and I would like to address the concerns raised at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tishreen07]].

Editing Interests: While I may have edited similar articles or topics as Tishreen07, this is because I have a genuine interest in insert your interest, e.g., Kurdish history, Middle Eastern topics, etc., which is not uncommon and does not imply sockpuppetry.

Editing Behavior: If there are behavioral similarities (such as formatting, language use, etc.), I assure you these are coincidental or based on common editing practices I learned from other editors and guidelines. I have never coordinated or shared an account with anyone.

Account Use: This is my only account. I have not used any other usernames or edited from alternate accounts/IPs with the intention of evading scrutiny or influencing discussions.

I respectfully request that the block be reconsidered in light of this information. I'm committed to contributing constructively to Wikipedia and following all policies, including those on sock puppetry. [[User:Wikivro|Wikivro]] ([[User talk:Wikivro#top|talk]]) 13:14, 25 June 2025 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand that a simple denial is not sufficient, and I would like to address the concerns raised at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tishreen07]].

Editing Interests: While I may have edited similar articles or topics as Tishreen07, this is because I have a genuine interest in insert your interest, e.g., Kurdish history, Middle Eastern topics, etc., which is not uncommon and does not imply sockpuppetry.

Editing Behavior: If there are behavioral similarities (such as formatting, language use, etc.), I assure you these are coincidental or based on common editing practices I learned from other editors and guidelines. I have never coordinated or shared an account with anyone.

Account Use: This is my only account. I have not used any other usernames or edited from alternate accounts/IPs with the intention of evading scrutiny or influencing discussions.

I respectfully request that the block be reconsidered in light of this information. I'm committed to contributing constructively to Wikipedia and following all policies, including those on sock puppetry. [[User:Wikivro|Wikivro]] ([[User talk:Wikivro#top|talk]]) 13:14, 25 June 2025 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I understand that a simple denial is not sufficient, and I would like to address the concerns raised at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tishreen07]].

Editing Interests: While I may have edited similar articles or topics as Tishreen07, this is because I have a genuine interest in insert your interest, e.g., Kurdish history, Middle Eastern topics, etc., which is not uncommon and does not imply sockpuppetry.

Editing Behavior: If there are behavioral similarities (such as formatting, language use, etc.), I assure you these are coincidental or based on common editing practices I learned from other editors and guidelines. I have never coordinated or shared an account with anyone.

Account Use: This is my only account. I have not used any other usernames or edited from alternate accounts/IPs with the intention of evading scrutiny or influencing discussions.

I respectfully request that the block be reconsidered in light of this information. I'm committed to contributing constructively to Wikipedia and following all policies, including those on sock puppetry. [[User:Wikivro|Wikivro]] ([[User talk:Wikivro#top|talk]]) 13:14, 25 June 2025 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

While there are clearly more than superficial similarities between you and the banned editor Tishreen, if you want to make your case, using an LLM/chatbot is the absolute worst way to get your unblock request considered, and you should rewrite it in your own words. You left parts of the LLM's instructions to you within your request, making it quite obvious. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 05:37, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Their grammar is almost the same, and they still use LLM. Just look at these diffs. [1][2][3][4] I strongly oppose any administrator removing this block. R3YBOl (🌲) 07:42, 26 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]