User talk:Wiki Operator Bob

Welcome!

Hi Wiki Operator Bob! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! S Philbrick (Talk) 21:10, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've done a lot of research for Wikipedia and I've actually been a contributor for over 5 years, my old account was hacked so this is my new account, and this is the first copyright violation I've gotten within my years volunteering my time for wikipedia. Wiki Operator Bob (talk) 22:15, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit reversion

In this edit here, I reverted some information that appears to be a violation of our copyright policy.

I provided a brief summary of the problem in the edit summary, which should be visible just below my name. You can also click on the "view history" tab in the article to see the recent history of the article. This should be an edit with my name, and a parenthetical comment explaining why your edit was reverted. If that information is not sufficient to explain the situation, please ask.

I do occasionally make mistakes. We get hundreds of reports of potential copyright violations every week, and sometimes there are false positives, for a variety of reasons. (Perhaps the material was moved from another Wikipedia article, or the material was properly licensed but the license information was not obvious, or the material is in the public domain but I didn't realize it was public domain, and there can be other situations generating a report to our Copy Patrol tool that turn out not to be actual copyright violations.) If you think my edit was mistaken, please politely let me know and I will investigate. ~~~~ S Philbrick (Talk) 21:10, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lifetime Enclosure (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Their outputs usually have multiple issues that prevent them from meeting our guidelines on writing articles. These include:

Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
Essay-like writing
Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
Close paraphrasing

Please address these issues. The best way to do it is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lifetime Enclosure and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 15:12, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This was not generate dby a large launguage model its from chamber of commerce websites, better business bureau customer reviews ETC I did a deep dive @Pythoncoder Wiki Operator Bob (talk) 15:14, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Wiki Operator Bob! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 15:12, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

hey @Pythoncoder, I pulled all this info and I did a deep dive from chamber of commerce, BBB and the businesses website as well as reviews from yelp and google. THis was not pulled from a large laungage model and I tried to get as much info as I could! Wiki Operator Bob (talk) 15:20, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further examination, while it does seem possible that you did write the draft yourself, the writing style does feel very LLM-like, because of its frequent use of bold text, lists, and promotional language. In addition, the inclusion of a "Conclusion" section may be suitable when writing an essay, but it is generally not recommended when writing an encyclopedia article. —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 15:41, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southern Table Hospitality (Company) (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Southern Table Hospitality (Company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Rambley (talk) 15:23, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Southern Table Hospitality (Company) (June 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Anerdw was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of these sources are directory listings, which are considered CORPTRIV, not significant coverage, and therefore don't count towards notability. The last one seems fine. The second-to-last one links to the wrong page, so I couldn't evaluate it.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Southern Table Hospitality (Company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Anerdw (talk) 18:37, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Anerdw, this is a brief overview of Southern Table, it's hard to find lots of info because it's a small local business that I would like to bring awareness to on Wikipedia's archives. Wiki Operator Bob (talk) 22:34, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Anerdw Please approve it, I may revise it in the future when more information becomes available. I know wikipedia is a living encyclopedia that changes with time, with lots of edits. Wiki Operator Bob (talk) 22:35, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Unfortunately, Wikipedia’s standards for notability, including for corporations, don’t depend on the size of the business. In order for an article to exist on Wikipedia, it needs to demonstrate that there are multiple reliable sources that provide significant coverage of the subject. If you can find more good sources, add them to the article and resubmit! If no such sources exist, it might just not be notable enough to have an article. Anerdw (talk) 23:49, 18 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Wiki Operator Bob! The thread you created at the Teahouse, I want to create a page for a business, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:15, 22 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]