User talk:User01938

Welcome!

Hi User01938! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Pahunkat (talk) 23:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matthew Cunningham (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Reading Beans was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The usable source here seems to be the Encyclopaedia of Arkansas, please, add more sources to establish notability. Best,

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Matthew Cunningham and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 03:25, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, User01938! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 03:25, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jonesboro mayors

Hi User01938. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for creating the Draft:List of mayors of Jonesboro, Arkansas. I hope you will continue building the list and adding references. I've added a few references to Mayors of Jonesboro, Arkansas. It would make sense to merge the two lists at some point. Cheers and thanks again for your work. -- M2545 (talk) 10:13, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I would have simply improved Mayors of Jonesboro, Arkansas had I known it existed; thank you for informing me! User01938 (talk) 18:03, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about 2016 Jonesboro mayoral election

Hello User01938, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, 2016 Jonesboro mayoral election, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Jonesboro mayoral election.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Yoblyblob}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Yoblyblob (Talk) :) 02:58, 13 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2020 Jonesboro mayoral election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 Jonesboro mayoral election, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 Jonesboro mayoral election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fort Smith mayors

Hi User01938. Thank you for starting the Draft:List of mayors of Fort Smith, Arkansas article. I did not notice it until today after I'd already compiled the Mayors of Fort Smith, Arkansas article. At some point, the two articles could be merged. Thanks again for your continued work on Arkansas history! Cheers. M2545 (talk) 13:04, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I realized that I forgot to respond to this and for that I am so sorry. Let's merge them! User01938 (talk) 07:54, 3 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Matteo Paz has been accepted

Matteo Paz, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

qcne (talk) 21:11, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! User01938 (talk) 21:12, 28 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi User01938. Thank you for your work on Matteo Paz. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

This is a clear case where notability is questionable in terms of WP:BIO1E, WP:BLP1E.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 10:31, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Regeneron Science Talent Search

Template:Regeneron Science Talent Search has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Ldm1954 (talk) 17:20, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Viviana Risca has been accepted

Viviana Risca, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:36, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reinier Beeuwkes III (June 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lijil was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All the references are either trivial (e.g. the Time article from 1958 that says he won a science competition which is nice but doesn't make him notable and is not substantial coverage - can be used to verify birthdate etc but not to show notability) or not independent (company profiles etc).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Reinier Beeuwkes III and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lijil (talk) 11:22, 30 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi User01938. Thank you for your work on Matteo Paz. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

There is now an established concensus that his prize does not qualify him for WP:NPROF. His paper also does not, since according to GS it has not been cited.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 15:18, 2 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: List of endorsements by Pete Buttigieg (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:List of endorsements by Pete Buttigieg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 09:37, 4 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]