User talk:TonySt/Archives/2025/06 (June)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions with User:TonySt. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
you’re a Skunt
I don’t know why you are being rude and taking the bad side but you don’t talk to me like that because I am just stating the facts that you all are too scared to talk about. 2603:7000:C700:DF:5FD:4B58:9E23:6006 (talk) 02:23, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
look at this
Megahippus — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ilooooveawesomehorses (talk • contribs) 04:09, 8 June 2025 (UTC)
Riley Gaines height
Your source. https://x.com/Riley_Gaines_/status/1931345437761376394 OldDiddlyBop (talk) 15:18, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Being based on truth with being straight forward , is there anything wrong? 2403:6200:8837:4DA1:9CF:FDFB:EA51:2566 (talk) 16:28, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hello! The info you introduced into the Pimpichaya Kokram article looked like MOS:PUFFERY, which we try to avoid. The content you added may have a place in the article, but it might be better to word it differently to avoid subjective proclamations. — Tony talk 17:28, 7 June 2025 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism!
You've beat me to it several times now - you're really fast! Thanks so much. 🏳️🌈JohnLaurens333 (need something?) 23:05, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! — Tony talk 23:11, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
Explanation for recently reverted math change on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nusselt_number
Hi TonySt,
I made the changes to the math for the Nusselt number you just reverted. I don't have experience editing Wikipedia, and didn't see a way to explain my edit, so apologies for what seemed like vandalism.
That being said, I noticed that the equation in question did not match some other sources I was looking at, so I checked the cited textbook and saw that the math and cite were incorrect on the wiki.
Here is the link I followed to check the textbook: https://hyominsite.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/fundamentals-of-heat-and-mass-transfer-6th-edition.pdf
If you look on Page 577, you can verify the three equations for free convection on a horizontal plate.
Cheers, Ian 2600:1000:B194:FAF7:8183:FDF8:25C9:A875 (talk) 00:05, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for leaving this message for me Ian! I've put your changes back -- sorry about that. I appreciate you reaching out. I hope you continue to contribute -- please let me know if there's anything I can do for you. Take care — Tony talk 00:08, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks Tony! Just hoping to save someone some confusion in the future haha. Impressive speed on the original reversion though, I have to say!
- Best,
- Ian 2600:1000:B194:FAF7:8183:FDF8:25C9:A875 (talk) 00:11, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
Solange
PLEASE don't revert my edit to Solange. Her middle name is actually Piaget, I corrected false info added by another user. Her name is not Solange Boyance Knowles as another person falsely claimed. It is Solange Piaget Knowles. You can look it up for yourself if you don't believe me. I would never stand for vandalism on wikipedia. 2600:1702:2A40:B10:7989:C3F0:C431:71BB (talk) 00:22, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! — Tony talk 00:25, 11 June 2025 (UTC)
You are extinct.
And he is not.
Donald is Jurassic (talk) 20:49, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
June 2025
Thank you for trying to keep Wikipedia free of vandalism. However, one or more edits you labeled as vandalism, such as the edit at Waymo, are not considered vandalism under Wikipedia policy. Wikipedia has a stricter definition of the word "vandalism" than common usage, and mislabeling edits as vandalism can discourage editors. Please see what is not vandalism for more information on what is and is not considered vandalism. Thank you.50.248.175.161 (talk) 16:29, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Reversion
What gives you the right to revert my edit to the Colorado Stem shooting article? It was factually accurate and added color to the article. TopShelf99 (talk) 21:02, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- Your edit went against Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Wikipedia only uses deadnames in certain cases and that is not one. –Skywatcher68 (talk) 21:10, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hello @TopShelf99. I initially reverted because I didn't see a source, but looking further it appears the information you added already existed elsewhere in the article with a source. Reading the manual of style's section on gender identity it seems that we should only include that information if the subject was notable before adopting their name or in cases when it is otherwise absolutely necessary -- and while it may be debatable whether it's pertinent to include it once, we can probably agree that it's not necessary to repeat it again unless it's in a context where it is absolutely necessary. — tony talk 21:14, 13 June 2025 (UTC)
- Where can I find the Manual of Style, as well as a copy of every one of the myriad rules cited by other Wikipedia editors? TopShelf99 (talk) 16:28, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Hello @TopShelf99. You can find the manual of style at this link. I'm also constantly learning more about the manual of style all the time. I want to stress that it's normal to not know everything in the MOS or in Wikipedia's policies -- I know I certainly don't know them all. Sometimes the way we learn about those is by another editor reverting and letting us know. I've had my edits reverted in the past because I didn't know about the way we should structure the first sentence of an article, or what to do when there's a disagreement on someone's date of birth. If someone reverts my edit because I wasn't following a policy or guideline, it's an opportunity for me to improve my own knowledge so I can be a better editor. Just today I learned about whether we should include a list of city counselors in articles about US cities (it turns out we generally shouldn't since they change all the time). Take care :) — tony 17:27, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
- Where can I find the Manual of Style, as well as a copy of every one of the myriad rules cited by other Wikipedia editors? TopShelf99 (talk) 16:28, 19 June 2025 (UTC)
AV Dark Plugin Kudos
Just wanted to say that the dark mode plugin you made for AV is amazing. Having just started using actual rollback tools---there is zero chance my poor eyes could use AV without it. Great work! Nubzor (T | C) 00:46, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you! I wasn't sure if anyone else would find it useful so it's encouraging to hear that positive feedback :) Take care, and see you around! — tony 01:13, 20 June 2025 (UTC)
spelling
It's a film made by a British person, so this is the correct spelling. Patient Zerotalk 03:48, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Patient Zero I learn something new every day! Thank you for letting me know. Also, thank you for everything you do on here -- you constantly beat me to fixing vandalism :) — tony 03:49, 22 June 2025 (UTC)
- No worries at all! And thank you - that's very kind! If you aren't already using it, Huggle is great for rapid reverts when you're on vandalism patrol - although I must say, I do also notice you sometimes beating me to reverts :) Patient Zerotalk 03:52, 22 June 2025 (UTC)