User talk:Tomw8911

Tomw8911, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Tomw8911! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Collaborationist Chinese Army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nationalist China. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 14 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 21

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

National Revolutionary Army

added links pointing to Canton, Guangxi Clique and Chahar

Fifth encirclement campaign against the Jiangxi Soviet

added links pointing to Jizhou and Guangchang

Collaborationist Chinese Army

added a link pointing to Provisional Government of the Republic of China

Development of the Chinese Nationalist air force (1937–1945)

added a link pointing to Qu River

Republic of China Naval Aviation Command

added a link pointing to Zuoying

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Hello, I'm Amigao. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Amigao (talk) 11:13, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Amigao (talk) 11:14, 27 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Fifth encirclement campaign against the Jiangxi Soviet

added links pointing to Jizhou and Guangchang

Collaborationist Chinese Army

added a link pointing to Provisional Government of the Republic of China

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

When adding citations, please ensure that it is clear which parts of the content the citation is supporting (see WP:INTEGRITY). You may need to add Template:Citation needed to account for the unsupported parts if you are adding a citation into an existing unsourced paragraph. If you are using a citation for multiple paragraphs, add the citation to the end of each paragraph. And it should go without saying that the content in the Wikipedia article must be present in the citation, especially if you are adding content (see WP:VERIFY, WP:OR, and WP:SYNTH).

Also review Wikipedia:Reliable sources; typically, self-published sources (WP:SELFPUB) are not reliable unless the author is a recognized as having notable expertise in the subject, and even then explicit attribution is ideal.

And since this is an English-language Wikipedia, it would be helpful if citations included English translations of titles, author, publisher names, etc. where possible.

Just looking at your recent edits to Republic of China Military Police ([1]), there are instances of:

Unverified/partially verified content changes
Use of unreliable sources (eg. 360doc, clarisonic)
WP:OR where etymology is concerned.
Lost of cases of MOS:NOBOLD.

I suspect similar problems exist in your edits to other articles. - RovingPersonalityConstruct (talk, contribs) 20:10, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]