User talk:TenthEagle

This is TenthEagle's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TenthEagle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The crime is that I "knowingly introduced copyright violations" I didn't, I was sent them by a friend, should've checked & it's now fixed. I only remove talk entries when they are rude. I'm requesting that I'm unblocked & I'll watch for copyright although one in 5000 edits is hardly hardcore.

Decline reason:

You are responsible for edits made from your account, whether they are of your own creation or based on something provided by another party. As copyright violations potentially put Wikipedia in legal jeopardy, we must take them seriously. This request does not convince me that this problem will not recur, so I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 09:02, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TenthEagle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Well that's harsh after 12 years & 5000 edits, particularly as on review, my copyright infringement while similar to that on Channel 4 website (as about the same thing) it's not verbatim & my comments were "snarky"

Decline reason:

Copyright violations are a habit. MER-C 10:28, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TenthEagle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I still feel that my blocking was harsh as my wording on the Adult Material page, while similar wasn't lifted from any other source it was just similar words about the same subject, so after 12 years and 5000 edits I am again appealing my Blocking as I believe it's more about deletions of talk messages rather than any infringement of Wiki rules. In addition, I don't have a "Copyright violation habit and no issues of personal attacks, or impolite conduct

Decline reason:

Per below. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:35, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TenthEagle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Here Goes - I've carefully read the articles on; Indefinite blocks, the Guide to appealing blocks, and the page on Close paraphrasing, which I believe is closest to the rational originally used to block me. I now have a much better understanding of the applied policy and will be more careful in the future taking greater responsibility for my edits. In the case of Adult Material, this was a pure coincidence that my two-sentence edit was so similar to the summary on the Channel 4 website. I got carried away with the edits on Hechtel-Eksel after seeing the knocked out Jagdpanther tank at the Imperial War Museum Duxford although I did credit the book in my edit. I do have a habit of deleting comments as I do with all media, this is something I will change moving forward and although some of the comments in hindsight bordered on rude, they were actually for my reference and not aimed at those trying to help me. I therefore submit a request to be unblocked and will see the past 10 months as a lesson in losing one of my favourite pastimes. Steve Bowen (talk) 11:49 am, 25 July 2022, last Monday (7 days ago) (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

Does not convincingly address how they will avoid introducing material copyrighted elsewhere into Wikipedia. Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:05, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request UnBlock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TenthEagle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I acknowledge that some of my contributions may have unintentionally included copyrighted material without proper attribution. I fully understand Wikipedia's policies regarding copyright, and I am committed to strictly adhering to them going forward. I am willing to review any guidance recommended to prevent this from happening again. I respectfully request a second chance to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, ensuring that all future edits are my own work or properly sourced in accordance with Wikipedia’s standards. Thank you for considering my appeal.

Decline reason:

This is a decent unblock request. Not necessarily compelling, particularly given the above. But what deeply, deeply concerns me is your comment below. "I pnly(sic) found out today I've been blocked". This is obvious nonsense. You clearly knew you were blocked years ago. Why you'd make a claim that is so obviously false is beyond me. You also claim "I've not removed anything" which is also false; see here. Frankly, it's hard to see how anyone can take these false statements with good faith. You are free to make a new unblock request but need to address this, as well as provide a more compelling reason to believe you understand copyright, when you previously worked hard to demonstrate you didn't and weren't willing to take responsibility for your violations. Yamla (talk) 15:24, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As it says, Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:54, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
HI & thanks but I'm not certain what that means, I thought this was my unblock review & I've not removed anything as I pnly found out today I've been blocked? Steve Bowen (talk) 15:16, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sure you have. You may have forgotten, since you did so in November, and you knew you were blocked in 2021 when you requested unblock. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:44, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TenthEagle (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'd like to request deletion of my user page. I'm not able to edit it myself, due to being blocked for a percivied Copyright infringement & the text above is having an extremely detrimental effect on my work life.

Decline reason:

This isn't an unblock request; in the future please use {{admin help}} if you need an admin for something other than unblocking. Please make an edit to this talkpage logged-in confirming that you want your userpage deleted, and I will do so. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 09:50, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Request reason:

Hi, my username is TenthEagle & I've just logged in. Please delete my userpage User:TenthEagle.

The page was blocked for a spurious copyright strike & despite my best efforts it won't be unblocked. I'm the sole author. G7 applies.

Block evasion

This user has evaded their block as Special:Contributions/2A04:4A43:8D6F:F7AD:0:0:0:0/64. This should be held against them in any future unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 11:15, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note this information is based on the unblock request made by the IP address, and them subsequently logging in and acknowledging this. --Yamla (talk) 11:16, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]