User talk:Tanagnos

Welcome!

Hello, Tanagnos, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Soil liquefaction. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! RockMagnetist (talk) 00:35, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tanagnos, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Tanagnos! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 00:55, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Izzat M. Idriss (November 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Izzat M. Idriss and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 05:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Izzat M. Idriss has been accepted

Izzat M. Idriss, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 22% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MolecularPilot ^{🧪️✈️} 04:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nathan M. Newmark Medal moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Nathan M. Newmark Medal. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 07:03, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nathan M. Newmark Medal (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The ASCE cannot establish notability for its own award.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nathan M. Newmark Medal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:10, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dear DoubleGrazing,

I am somewhat confused by your feedback on the Nathan M. Newmark Medal page. There are many pages exactly like the Nathan M. Newmark page on Wikipedia that highlight awards in a variety of fields. None of them have journal sources and they all point back to the organization that sponsors the medal. For example:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Noble_Prize (ASCE)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norman_Medal (ASCE)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russ_Prize (NAE)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theodore_von_Karman_Medal (ASCE)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astor_Cup_(auto_race)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vilhelm_Bjerknes_Medal (European Geosciences Union)

Can you help me understand how the Nathan M. Newmark page is different from these other pages. What kind of sources are you looking for?

Thank you 74.95.202.210 (talk) 16:14, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nathan M. Newmark Medal (March 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't meet WP:NMEDAL.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nathan M. Newmark Medal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 10:36, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Haresh C. Shah moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Haresh C. Shah.Did you mean to publish it? There are a lot of reference and other errors. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. Did you mean to publish it? There are substantial errors.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JSFarman (talk) 07:17, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages David Friedman and Christopher Arnold. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 28 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]