User talk:Tahanazir

Hello, Tahanazir! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Mean as custard (talk) 08:48, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Mean as custard (talk) 08:48, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Journal of applied pharmacy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Journal of applied pharmacy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ... discospinster _talk 20:24, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pharmaceutical review

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pharmaceutical review, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ... discospinster _talk 20:27, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

== Request to Contest G11 Speedy Deletion of "Pharmaceutical Review" ==

I respectfully contest the speedy deletion tag (G11) placed on the article *Pharmaceutical Review*. I believe the article does not constitute unambiguous advertising, but rather an early draft of a potentially notable scientific publication or project.

The subject is a scholarly science communication platform that has been involved in academic publishing, peer-reviewed commentary, and pharmaceutical education. The original intent was to document the entity’s academic role—not to promote a commercial service. I acknowledge that the current version may have contained wording perceived as promotional, and I am fully willing to revise the article to meet Wikipedia’s WP:NPOV (Neutral Point of View) and WP:TONE guidelines.

I would like the opportunity to improve the article by:

Rewriting promotional-sounding content into factual, encyclopedic language.
Adding reliable secondary sources to demonstrate notability under WP:ORG or WP:PUB guidelines.
Ensuring all claims are verifiable through published third-party academic and news sources.

Please allow me to address the current deficiencies rather than delete the page immediately. I will work to bring the article into compliance with all Wikipedia content standards, or alternatively, submit it via the Articles for Creation (AfC) process if necessary.

Thank you for your consideration. Tahanazir (talk) 23:00, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TRJ

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on TRJ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ... discospinster _talk 20:32, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pakistan Pharmacist Federation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pakistan Pharmacist Federation, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. — kikichugirl ^inquire 04:53, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Consortium Publisher Canada - ICDTD Inc (December 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://consortiumpublisher.org/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Consortium Publisher Canada - ICDTD Inc may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 21:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tahanazir! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 21:55, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

== Appeal to Restore Submission: Consortium Publisher Canada - ICDTD Inc. ==

Dear KylieTastic,

Thank you for your thoughtful review of my submission for the article Consortium Publisher Canada - ICDTD Inc. I sincerely appreciate the time you’ve taken to address the concerns regarding the use of copyrighted material. I fully understand and respect Wikipedia's policy on the inclusion of copyrighted text and the necessity for articles to be written in an original, neutral, and verifiable manner.

I regretfully acknowledge that portions of the draft were derived from [[1]], [[2]], and [[3]]. I recognize that this was a mistake, and I appreciate you bringing it to my attention. I would like to clarify that it was never my intention to violate Wikipedia's copyright policies or to promote any content in a manner inconsistent with Wikipedia’s standards.

Moving forward, I will take the following steps to ensure the article complies with Wikipedia's guidelines:

Rewriting the Article: I will remove all text that was directly copied from the Consortium Publisher websites, and I will rewrite the content entirely in my own words, focusing on presenting Consortium Publisher Canada - ICDTD Inc. as an independent entity based on verifiable sources.

Neutral and Encyclopedic Tone: I will ensure that the article is written in a neutral tone, avoiding any promotional or marketing language. The content will align with Wikipedia’s standards for neutrality, as outlined in the Neutral point of view policy (WP:NPOV).
Verifiable and Reliable Citations: I will cite reliable, independent sources that support the notability and relevance of Consortium Publisher Canada - ICDTD Inc. in a scientific, academic, and business context. I will ensure all references are fully verifiable and come from reputable, third-party sources.
Citing External Sources: Information about Consortium Publisher Canada - ICDTD Inc. will be supported with citations from independent, authoritative sources such as:

* Academic Journals (where applicable) related to publishing, academic research, and science communication.

* Industry Articles and reputable databases in the fields of publishing, education, and scientific communication.

* Third-party Media Coverage, such as news stories, interviews, or features in respected outlets (e.g., [News], [Globe and Mail]).

Removal of Copyrighted Material: I will ensure that all material originally derived from the Consortium Publisher websites is eliminated and rewritten to reflect original content that aligns with Wikipedia’s editorial standards.

I respectfully request that the article Consortium Publisher Canada - ICDTD Inc. be restored to my draft space while I complete the necessary revisions. I am committed to providing a high-quality, accurate, and verifiable article that adheres to all of Wikipedia's content guidelines.

Thank you for your understanding, and I am fully committed to addressing the concerns raised. I look forward to making the necessary changes and submitting the revised draft for further review.

Sincerely,

Taha Nazir PhD

== Submission Instructions for Restoration: ==

This message can be posted on your Talk Page under KylieTastic or the appropriate reviewer’s talk page.
Once revisions are made, submit the updated draft for Articles for Creation review again, ensuring all the required changes are made.

Tahanazir (talk) 23:16, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Pakistan Pharmacist Federation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pakistan Pharmacist Federation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Helen(💬📖) 22:40, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

== Appeal Against Speedy Deletion Nomination of "Pakistan Pharmacist Federation" ==

Dear Helen,

Thank you for reviewing the "Pakistan Pharmacist Federation" article and for bringing the issue of its speedy deletion to my attention. I would like to respectfully contest this nomination and present a clear case for why the article should not be deleted, providing the following points to address the concerns raised.

=== 1. Notability of the Pakistan Pharmacist Federation ===

The Pakistan Pharmacist Federation (PFF) is a well-established national organization in Pakistan, representing a significant and influential body of professionals in the pharmaceutical sector. The Federation plays an essential role in advocating for the pharmacy profession, advancing pharmaceutical education, and improving public health through various initiatives. Given its established presence, contributions to policy-making, and direct impact on the healthcare system, PFF qualifies as a notable entity under Wikipedia’s notability criteria for organizations.

The Federation is a central player in pharmacy-related discussions in Pakistan, and its influence extends to both the public and private sectors. As such, the article should reflect its contributions to public health and professional advocacy. I am committed to supplementing the article with additional, reliable third-party sources that substantiate its notability and long-standing impact.

=== 2. Compliance with Wikipedia’s Content Policies ===

I acknowledge the importance of adhering to Wikipedia’s policies, particularly the neutral point of view (NPOV) and verifiability guidelines. I recognize that the article may have included language that could be perceived as promotional, and I sincerely apologize for any such oversight. I am fully prepared to revise the article in line with Wikipedia’s standards, removing any promotional content and ensuring that all statements are supported by verifiable, third-party sources.

In line with these guidelines, I will revise the article to present the information in a neutral, factual tone that is free of promotional language, focusing strictly on the organization’s achievements, role in the community, and documented activities. Furthermore, I will ensure that the article provides only verifiable facts, with each claim supported by credible, independent sources.

=== 3. Commitment to Citations from Reliable Sources ===

I understand that Wikipedia’s verifiability policy is crucial for maintaining the integrity of content. To address the concerns raised, I will carefully revise the article by adding independent, third-party sources from reputable news outlets, academic journals, and other authoritative publications that report on the Federation’s initiatives, events, and public statements. This will ensure that all claims in the article are adequately sourced and reflect a reliable and balanced perspective.

Additionally, I am fully committed to ensuring that all citations adhere to Wikipedia’s citation guidelines, and I will remove any references that may not meet the required standards for reliability.

=== 4. Willingness to Collaborate with Experienced Editors ===

I understand the importance of following Wikipedia’s content policies and am open to collaborating with other experienced editors to improve the quality of the article. I recognize that Wikipedia’s collaborative nature fosters the creation of high-quality, well-sourced articles. Therefore, I am committed to addressing any remaining issues with the article, working with editors and the community to ensure that it meets Wikipedia’s standards.

=== 5. Conclusion ===

Given the Pakistan Pharmacist Federation’s notability as a national organization with a significant role in public health and professional advocacy, and my commitment to revising the article to ensure it complies with Wikipedia’s editorial standards, I respectfully request that the speedy deletion nomination be reconsidered. I am confident that once revised, the article will meet Wikipedia’s requirements and provide valuable, neutral information about the Federation’s role in Pakistan’s pharmaceutical sector.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to working with the Wikipedia community to improve the article and ensure it adheres to all relevant guidelines. Tahanazir (talk) 23:25, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Advanced Multiple Incorporation Canada

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Advanced Multiple Incorporation Canada, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Helen(💬📖) 22:41, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

== Appeal Against Speedy Deletion of "Advanced Multiple Incorporation Canada" ==

Dear Helen,

I appreciate your review and the notification regarding the speedy deletion nomination of the article "Advanced Multiple Incorporation Canada." After carefully considering the reasons for the deletion nomination, I respectfully contest the deletion and would like to provide clarification and steps I am willing to take to align the article with Wikipedia’s content policies.

=== 1. Notability of Advanced Multiple Incorporation Canada ===

Advanced Multiple Incorporation Canada (AMIC) is a registered Canadian company with a recognized presence within its industry, and it plays a significant role in the field of business and technology in Canada. The organization is involved in impactful initiatives that have been covered by independent sources. These sources include notable industry publications, news outlets, and authoritative third-party references. I am more than willing to add these reliable sources to the article to substantiate its notability in line with Wikipedia’s notability guidelines for companies and organizations.

=== 2. Commitment to Adherence to Wikipedia’s Guidelines ===

I fully acknowledge that the initial draft may have lacked the required neutral tone and contained promotional language. I understand that Wikipedia content must adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid any form of promotional content. I am committed to revising the article to remove all advertising-like language and reframe it in a strictly factual and objective manner. The goal is to provide verifiable, neutral, and encyclopedic content that reflects AMIC’s activities without bias.

=== 3. Third-Party Coverage and Reliable Sources ===

To meet Wikipedia’s standards for verifiability, I will update the article with citations from independent and reliable third-party sources, ensuring all claims are properly supported. Any self-references or first-party content, including the company’s website and press releases, will be replaced with third-party references from trusted industry publications, news outlets, or academic sources. For context, I will reference AMIC’s official domains, such as [4](https://advancedmultiple.ca/) and [5](https://advancedmultiple.com/), only where appropriate, ensuring they complement independent citations rather than acting as primary sources.

=== 4. Transparency and Improvements ===

I am committed to enhancing the article with relevant, accurate, and sourced information. If the deletion proceeds, I will work on improving the article in my sandbox and submit it for review once the article fully meets Wikipedia’s policies. Additionally, I will ensure that all statements made are verifiable through external, independent sources, which will contribute to the overall credibility of the article.

=== 5. Commitment to Wikipedia’s Standards ===

It is important to emphasize that I respect Wikipedia’s editorial standards and guidelines, and I aim to contribute valuable and factual information to the platform. I am dedicated to providing a balanced and neutral portrayal of AMIC, and I am more than willing to collaborate with experienced editors to refine the article further, if needed.

=== Conclusion ===

In light of the notability of AMIC, my willingness to rewrite the article with proper third-party sources, and my commitment to following Wikipedia’s content policies, I respectfully request that the speedy deletion nomination be reconsidered. I believe that the article, once rewritten and properly sourced, will meet Wikipedia’s standards for inclusion and will provide valuable information to readers.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I look forward to working collaboratively to ensure that the article adheres to Wikipedia’s guidelines. Tahanazir (talk) 23:21, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Consortium eLearning

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Consortium eLearning, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Helen(💬📖) 22:44, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Consortium Publisher Canada

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Consortium Publisher Canada, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. WhoAteMyButter (📨_talk│📝^contribs) 23:07, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

– Athaenara ✉ 23:12, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tahanazir (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I respectfully request review of my indefinite block. I believe there has been a misunderstanding regarding my intentions on Wikipedia. My recent edits and article drafts, particularly those concerning Dr. Taha Nazir—a Pakistani-Canadian microbiologist, pharmaceutical scientist, national political candidate, and public journalist—were intended to contribute verifiable, notable biographical information to Wikipedia based on reliable, third-party sources.

I understand Wikipedia’s guidelines regarding conflict of interest (COI), neutrality, and notability. I acknowledge that content promoting non-notable figures or written with a promotional tone is not acceptable. However, my aim was not to advertise or promote, but to contribute a well-sourced encyclopedic article in line with Wikipedia's content policies. Dr. Nazir is a peer-reviewed researcher with over two decades of scientific contributions, published books, international recognition, and is currently a confirmed political candidate in the 2025 Canadian federal election (Brampton Centre riding). This is a matter of public record and of potential encyclopedic interest.

I am committed to working within Wikipedia’s collaborative and neutral framework and will now submit all future articles through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process for community review. I kindly ask for reconsideration and the opportunity to demonstrate responsible editing behavior. Tahanazir (talk) 22:56, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We do not consider chatbot-generated requests. GPTZero score: 100%. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 01:04, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have removed the article-like content that you posted on this page. The purpose of your user talk page is notification and communication with other Wikipedia editors. It is not a workspace for articles in progress or for self-promotion. While you are blocked, the only purpose you should be using it for is to appeal your block. You have discovered that AI-generated appeals are not considered; please try again without the use of an AI tool.

It's also unclear as to whether you are Taha Nazir himself, or someone else writing on his behalf. Please clarify whether or not you are this person, and also whether more than one person has access to this account. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 04:00, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]