User talk:TJGhicl

January 2025

Hello, I'm Wburrow. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mega Man have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Wburrow (talk) 18:08, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you also is their any feedback you can give me? TJGhicl (talk) 18:14, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a draft for a Wikipedia article about yourself, at User:TJGhicl/sandbox. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Notable people who have edited Wikipedia). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Shadow311 (talk) 18:36, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadow311 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:TJGhicl/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Shadow311 (talk) 18:35, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TJGhicl! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Shadow311 (talk) 18:35, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you i did not know you couldn't write autobiographies so thank you for that info! TJGhicl (talk) 04:02, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Canyon Springs Stem Academy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Canyon Springs Stem Academy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Pollia (talk) 16:42, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Canyon Springs Stem Academy moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Canyon Springs Stem Academy, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Bbb23 (talk) 16:46, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you!!!! TJGhicl (talk) 16:47, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

also is it deleted because if so can you give me it so I can work on it more? TJGhicl (talk) 16:50, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As the notice states, it's now in draft. It was not ready for article space.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:52, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you TJGhicl (talk) 16:53, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for the trouble I'm kind of new to this but I'm working on this page so thank you! TJGhicl (talk) 16:54, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unless there are independent references (see WP:42) about the academy there is no potential for Draft:Canyon Springs Stem Academy being approved as an article. David notMD (talk) 17:37, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello TJGhicl! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Is their a way to make it so only I can edit my articles, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:30, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]