User talk:Sthaas76

This is Sthaas76's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crestpoint University (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanilla Wizard was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not contain any citations. Please see Wikipedia:Citing sources for more information on how to properly cite a source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crestpoint University and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanilla Wizard 💙 18:42, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sthaas76! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vanilla Wizard 💙 18:42, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crestpoint University (July 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Primary sources do not establish notability per WP:NCORP.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Crestpoint University and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:24, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crestpoint University (July 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

qcne (talk) 15:51, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand what is going on here. This is just a successor article for an organization whose article has been on Wikipedia for almost 20 years. How can us not be sufficiently notable to be on Wikipedia if the same article under a different name has been on Wikipedia for 20 years? Sthaas76 (talk) 15:59, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Sthaas76 I have replied to your msg at the bottom of my User Talk Page. Thank you for notifying me about the National Paralegal College article - I have started a discussion to delete it. Let me know on my User Talk Page if you have more questions. qcne (talk) 16:04, 11 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Virtually all schools on this page (over half of which have Wikipedia pages) are in the same boat. Would you like to have all of those pages deleted as well?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_universities_accredited_by_DEAC Sthaas76 (talk) 21:19, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Sthaas76. Yep - if they are all poorly sourced with no indication they meet Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) then they should all indeed be deleted! Thanks for pointing them out. qcne (talk) 12:19, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]