User talk:Stewartbaines

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for submitting an article to Wikipedia. Your draft submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please take a look and respond if possible. You can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Small Cells. If there is no response within seven days, the request may be declined. If this happens, please feel free to continue to work on the article. You can resubmit it (by adding the text {{subst:submitdraft}} to the top of the article) when you believe the concerns have been addressed. Thank you. Glacialfox (talk) 00:51, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Small Cells, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:07, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Small Cells

Stewart, I've done a quick copy-edit. Two other things: a) you might like to tweak the inline citations to make them a bit more descriptive (name of website/organization, title of book/article, author and date if appropriate, date retrieved if webpage). b) I wonder if there are any relevant diagrams or photographs (copyright-free, or licensed with a rationale justifying their use) that could help to explain the essence of the topic? Just a thought. Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:16, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]