User talk:Solidest/Archives/2020
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Solidest. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Disambiguation link notification for February 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Psychedelic trance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ambient (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:10, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 30
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amapiano, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lounge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:24, 30 March 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Solidest
Thank you for creating Ed Banger Records discography.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Review under new article curation / review process. The main question is meeting wp:notability. Common practice is to waive the usual requirements if it is a discography in support of an article that meets that requirement. So I'm marking this as reviewed. Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 20:44, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Deconstructed club
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Deconstructed club, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from https://pitchfork.com/features/article/2010s-rise-of-conceptronica-electronic-music/, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- Have the author release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License (CC BY-SA 3.0) by leaving a message explaining the details at Talk:Deconstructed club and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure they quote the exact page name, Deconstructed club, in their email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Deconstructed club. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Deconstructed club with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
It may also be necessary for the text to be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
See Wikipedia:Declaration of consent for all enquiries for a template of the permissions letter the copyright holder is expected to send.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Deconstructed club saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Diannaa (talk) 15:20, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Solidest
Thank you for creating Bubblegum bass.
User:Rosguill, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
I'm not sure that this makes for the best redirect, as our article about PC Music doesn't really explain what bubblegum bass is. That having been said, I think you almost have enough sources here to start a stub (and can certainly find more online), and would encourage you to start writing that article. FWIW, you also don't need to provide citations on redirect pages (although links in edit summaries for obscure redirects are appreciated)
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
signed, Rosguill talk 19:46, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Deconstructed club, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Grime (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:21, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Darkcore
I mean no real battle with you, but I had to laugh at you throwing a WP:DE at me on Darkcore. The article was and has been absolutely accurate and concise for ages and need I remind you that it was actually you that stomped into it adding additional genre names when the traditional convention might be to take it to Talk first, and then doubling-down by adding the three pretty weak and contemporary website refs to support your change whilst trying to make me the disruptive editor?! Got to admire it! 77.86.103.78 (talk) 13:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- To be honest, I can't understand your fanaticism regarding this name and inadmissibility of appearing on the genre page. I came across such name few times on the links that I would not like to post as the sources, like https://rateyourmusic.com/list/TheScientist/rym-ultimate-box-set-darkcore-jungle/, youtube or other inter-language wikis, so I've found the better sources that could confirm that the name is in use. So I come from the fact that we might think that darkcore jungle is a separate darkcore genre (the fourth, after darkcore [hardcore edm], darkstep and this one), but it's not. It's the same as this one - the development of hardcore breaks, and that's all I want to point out here. Also, the genres are not "time capsule", which stays forever in the time they were created or were popular, people can call them with new names and this is OK. (eg, Scouse house has 5 names or so, which appeared sequentially by decades).
- And once again, you keep ignoring things which I'm pointing out - you are breaking WP:EXPERTISE or WP:AMNESIA. I gave you links that confirm the use of the name in various places, and all you said is "I know the scene better" or "this is contemporary names". Instead of starting a conversation on the Talk page, you continued reverting edits without any decent reasons. It's exactly what I'd call WP:DE. Solidest (talk) 15:50, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
- No fanaticism at all, it's just that there was nothing wrong with it as it was. Besides, not being funny, but about 90% of your last 500 edits seem to be around genres! Whatevs, peace! 77.86.103.78 (talk) 16:22, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Techno
I was vandalizing nothing. I was simply trying to make a template more accurate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:C7:C201:C640:F47E:5B35:8067:73AA (talk) 17:29, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
The Half Barnstar |
For your work on Hyperpop. Bearian (talk) 01:36, 11 December 2020 (UTC) |