User talk:Shrabaniexp

Welcome!

Hello, Shrabaniexp, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Experience.com, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Bored kittycat (talk) 13:06, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Experience.com

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Experience.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Bored kittycat (talk) 13:06, 23 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Shrabaniexp. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 08:07, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I’m new to Wikipedia's editing guidelines and may have made unintentional mistakes. I sincerely appreciate your help and am open to learning and improving. @ProClasher97

My intent is not to promote the company, but to draft the article based on publicly available information in accordance with Wikipedia’s notability and content policies. I fully understand that any Wikipedia editor is welcome to review, edit, or improve the draft to ensure it aligns with Wikipedia standards. Shrabaniexp (talk) 05:41, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Shrabaniexp, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Shrabaniexp|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:49, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @DoubleGrazing, for your guidance.

I’d like to clarify that while I am an employee of Experience.com, I am not being paid or compensated—directly or indirectly—for editing or creating content on Wikipedia. I’m new to Wikipedia's editing guidelines and may have made unintentional mistakes. I sincerely appreciate your help and am open to learning and improving.

My intent is not to promote the company, but to draft the article based on publicly available information in accordance with Wikipedia’s notability and content policies. I fully understand that any Wikipedia editor is welcome to review, edit, or improve the draft to ensure it aligns with Wikipedia standards.

I will update my user page with a disclosure for transparency and will refrain from further edits until I receive further input.

Thank you again for your patience and support. Shrabaniexp (talk) 05:37, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.

Just to be clear, when you're writing about your employer, you're considered a paid editor, even if you're not explicitly paid to edit Wikipedia. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:59, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the clarification—I appreciate your guidance. I understand that, since I’m writing about my employer, I’m considered a paid editor under Wikipedia’s guidelines, even if I wasn’t directly compensated to create or edit the page.

I'm seeking help to improve the draft in a neutral and verifiable manner, ensuring it is based solely on reliable and independent sources. I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia’s conflict of interest (COI) policies. Thank you again for your time and support! Shrabaniexp (talk) 07:29, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]