User talk:Shemgeneri

Welcome!

Hello, Shemgeneri, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mathglot (talk) 13:36, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Thank you for your messege and tips, i am sure they will be helpfull as i am here. Shemgeneri (talk) 14:46, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accuracy when summarising a source

When you cite a source, it is critical that you give an honest summary of it content. In particular, you must not report it a saying significantly more (or significantly less) than it say. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 16:22, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for your comment, i am not sure i understand what you are saying. Could you please be kinf and show me a good example of a place i did something wrong, so i can learn for the next time? Shemgeneri (talk) 16:28, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged in, have 500 edits, and have an account age of 30 days, and you are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

win8x (talk) 19:15, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Without regard to the quality of the article, your new article, Mehraveh Khandan, contains a paragraph about the Arab-Israeli conflict (which the Iran–Israel war is part of). You cannot make such edits, per policy, as you are not extended-confirmed. win8x (talk) 19:20, 19 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Blood, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources to see how to add references to an article. The encyclopedia doesn't rely on news reports, WP:NOTNEWS. For blood or any medical topic, a reputable review article is needed per WP:MEDRS. Zefr (talk) 19:39, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

with all due respect, i am sure these sources are reliable, rather than deleting, you should have bring more sources like these:

https://www.lemonde.fr/en/science/article/2025/06/21/gwada-negative-french-scientists-find-new-blood-type-in-woman_6742577_10.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20250621-french-scientists-find-new-blood-type-in-guadeloupe-woman

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/french-scientists-blood-type-guadeloupe-115513761.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/french-scientists-discover-new-blood-type-guadeloupe-woman/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

now i do expect you to restore the information you deleted Shemgeneri (talk) 21:44, 21 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]