User talk:Satishmnavy85

Welcome!

Hi Satishmnavy85! I would like to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! EggRoll97 ^(talk) 22:51, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thankyou sir Satishmnavy85 (talk) 07:01, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ULYSTAR (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ULYSTAR and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Satishmnavy85! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:ULYSTAR

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:ULYSTAR, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:13, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Hello, I'm DoubleGrazing. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:14, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, instead posting the contents of your draft to the Teahouse, just provide a link to it; place the full title of the draft in double brackets, like this, [[Title here]]. 331dot (talk) 09:32, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the advice Satishmnavy85 (talk) 09:49, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see that you disclosed a COI on the draft(it's better to do this on your user page, User:Satishmnavy85). What is the general nature of your conflict of interest? 331dot (talk) 09:52, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The page already deleted I don't have any COI. Thanks brother Satishmnavy85 (talk) 10:03, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Why did you declare one if you don't have one? 331dot (talk) 10:05, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the Satish that is the creator and CEO of the app, as you wrote in the draft? 331dot (talk) 10:07, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok understood Satishmnavy85 (talk) 10:49, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That doesn't answer the question. The more open you are with us, the more we can help you, if that's what you want. 331dot (talk) 10:50, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I'm the CEO, Developer & Creator of the App Satishmnavy85 (talk) 10:55, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anyways thanks brother atleast you gave time to help me Satishmnavy85 (talk) 10:58, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Then you need to formally disclose that on your user page. As I assume you created the app to earn a living, you must make the paid editing disclosure, a Terms of Use requirement, if you intend to participate here. 331dot (talk) 10:59, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: ULYSTAR (March 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Pure promotion, with zero evidence of notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ULYSTAR and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:57, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

You've now submitted two drafts about your business, and unfortunately both were completely wrong, so let me tell you what you should be doing instead.

You've basically written an online brochure or presentation, telling the reader what your company does, its market position, etc. That is considered purely promotional (see WP:YESPROMO), and we have zero interest in any of that. We are almost exclusively interested in what independent and reliable secondary sources have said about your business and what makes it worthy of note. Your job is merely to summarise their coverage (in your own words, but without putting any 'spin' on things), citing each source against the information it has provided.

The first step is therefore to find multiple sources meeting the standard described in WP:NCORP. If you cannot find such sources, you will not be able to write an article based on them, and should stop there. So far you haven't cited a single eligible source, which suggests that your business may well be not notable enough to be included in the encyclopaedia. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:46, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hello Satishmnavy85! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Please help to publish the article if it looks promotional, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:37, 4 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]