Jump to content

User talk:Sarah777

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


What the critics said -
"She's had years to adapt. She hasn't. It's time for her to be gone. Rklawton (talk) 19:36, 24 May 2011 (UTC)"[reply]
"I have thought long and hard to re-create what went through my mind at the time" - American Liar (2013)
Icon This user has been on Wikipedia for 19 years and 18 days.




Hi folks....I'm back now! wassup?!!(Sarah777 15:40, 8 August 2007 (UTC))[reply]
They're threatening to ban you for an entire bloody year at Arbcom. Absolutely f**k*** outrageous!
Show them your article creation list, Sarah, I think you probably have the record.
Sure you lose your rag from time to time - but don't we all, especially when faced with extreme provocation and wind-up merchnats....Gaimhreadhan (kiwiexile at DMOZ) talk • 17:46, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Template:WikiProject Ireland

Ireland Wiki State of Play - Aug 16 2007

[edit]
Ireland
articles		 Importance
Top High Mid Low None Total
Quality
FA 4 4
A
GA 5 5
B 5 2 7 3 39 56
Start 2 3 25 122 237 389
Stub 8 160 317 485
Assessed 7 5 40 285 602 939
Unassessed 0 0 0 1 286 287
Total 7 5 40 286 888 1226

Category:Ireland articles by quality

Latest version

[edit]

here

Ireland articles by quality and importance
Quality Importance
Top High Mid Low NA ??? Total
FA 6 4 25 34 69
FL 2 6 8
GA 1 11 63 177 252
B 31 196 448 899 1,574
C 29 209 982 4,682 5,902
Start 201 2,298 28,751 31,250
Stub 370 26,277 26,647
List 32 331 3,087 3,450
Category 26,760 26,760
Disambig 186 186
File 180 180
Portal 26 26
Project 20 20
Redirect 9 63 1,138 1,931 3,141
Template 3,078 3,078
Other 2 84 86
Assessed 67 662 4,582 65,053 32,265 102,629
Unassessed 1 9 1 11
Total 67 662 4,583 65,062 32,265 1 102,640
WikiWork factors (?) ω = 344,960 Ω = 5.25

Assessment Log

The World Destubathon

[edit]

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for articles which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:29, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trump's anti-American history

[edit]

This is just a bit of it....

According to former KGB major Yuri Shvets, Russia has been trying to cultivate Trump as a Russian intelligence "asset", not an actual "agent" (spy), for many years. He became the target of a joint KGB and Czech intelligence services spying operation after he married Czech model Ivana Zelnickova[1] and has been cultivated as an "asset" since 1977: "Russian intelligence gained an interest in Trump as far back as 1977, viewing Trump as an exploitable target."[2] Shvets describes why "Trump was the ideal target for Soviet recruitment. 'He was the perfect combination of extremes: Extreme vanity, extremely low IQ, extreme vulnerability to flattery, and of course, extremely greedy.'"[3] Trump was just one of many targeted by the KGB: "The Russians were trying to recruit like crazy and going after dozens and dozens of people." This time it paid off, and the KGB celebrated its success.[4]

Three years later, Trump finished his first large building project, the Grand Hyatt New York hotel, furnishing it with "hundreds of televisions from a Russian immigrant who was a KGB spotter and who highlighted him as a potential asset, being an up-and-coming businessman".[4] "Then, in 1987, Trump and Ivana visited Moscow and St Petersburg for the first time. Shvets said he was fed KGB talking points and flattered by KGB operatives who floated the idea that he should go into politics." Shvets compared the young Trump to the Cambridge Five, where early recruitment bore fruit for Russia much later.[1]

For the KGB, it was a charm offensive. They had collected a lot of information on his personality so they knew who he was personally. The feeling was that he was extremely vulnerable intellectually, and psychologically, and he was prone to flattery.
This is what they exploited. They played the game as if they were immensely impressed by his personality and believed this is the guy who should be the president of the United States one day: it is people like him who could change the world. They fed him these so-called active measures soundbites and it happened. So it was a big achievement for the KGB active measures at the time.[1]

He was "groomed by the Russians to pursue a political career",[3] and after he returned to the United States, he immediately began to seek the Republican nomination for president. He also began publishing unorthodox and anti-American sentiments.[1] Trump was not viewed as an actual spy but as an asset who is a "useful idiot". Kyle Cunliffe, a lecturer in intelligence studies, puts it this way:

We're talking about Trump being a self-interested businessman who's happy to do a favour if it works to his own best interests – and that includes staying out of jail. ... Simply put, an agent is a partner for life, whereas an asset is a friend with benefits. And, most likely, if Trump has been one of the two, it's the latter.[5]

Valjean (talk) (PING me) 23:22, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You are polluting my page with disinformation! For starters, whatever you think of him, "extremely low IQ" is not factual. Most assessments I've read put him from above average to one of the highest in US Presidential history (probably a low bar!). Sarah777 (talk) 12:50, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
A definite very bigly IQ. Some of the best... I've talked to some of them, and some of the best IQ people say so! BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 14:12, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not surprised you're not being more fact based on this. I asked ChatGPT - as we do these days - and it said:
There is no credible, verified IQ score for Donald Trump—he hasn’t released any official results from a standardized IQ test.
A widely circulated claim suggested Trump scored 73 on an IQ test during his time at New York Military Academy, but this was thoroughly debunked. Fact-checkers found no evidence to support the claim—no record exists, no genuine source ever reported it, and even individuals familiar with the academy at that time say such tests weren’t administered."
So I guess you folk are only guessing. Which is a poor reflection on your own...eh...thoroughness!
Sarah777 (talk) 14:36, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Chat also said when I asked it is there was any evidence that Trump was "anti-American"
There’s no credible evidence that Donald Trump is "anti‑American" in the sense of disloyal or opposed to the United States as a nation.
Sarah777 (talk) 14:51, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

References

  1. ^ a b c d Smith, David (January 29, 2021). "'The perfect target': Russia cultivated Trump as asset for 40 years – ex-KGB spy". The Guardian. Retrieved September 28, 2022.
  2. ^ Palma, Bethania (February 2, 2021). "Did Ex-KGB Spy Say Russia Cultivated Trump as an 'Asset' for 40 Years?". Snopes. Retrieved December 21, 2021.
  3. ^ a b "Book Yuri Shvets for Speaking, Events and Appearances". APB Speakers. Jul 13, 2018. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
  4. ^ a b Times of Israel Staff (January 29, 2021). "KGB groomed Trump as an asset for 40 years, former Russian spy says". The Times of Israel. Retrieved July 20, 2024.
  5. ^ Cunliffe, Kyle (June 8, 2023). "Donald Trump spying allegations: more likely useful idiot than Putin's agent". The Conversation. Retrieved February 13, 2024.

Valjean (talk) (PING me) 23:22, 5 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of R155 road (Ireland)

[edit]
Notice

The article R155 road (Ireland) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet Wikipedia's general notability guidelines. Aldorwyn of Rivendell (talk) 11:16, 21 July 2025 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:36, 22 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have visited this article and its talk page and cannot see anything about a proposed deletion. Can anyone gives me a heads-up on this? Sarah777 (talk) 14:31, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh. Some drama! Long story short, the proposed deletion was itself deleted, all good! BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 14:52, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Sounds good! Thanks Bastun. Sarah777 (talk) 14:59, 24 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sarah777&oldid=1302299649"