User talk:Rhain

talk

2011 · 2012 · 2013 · 2014
2015 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2016 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2017 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2018 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2019 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2020 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2021 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2022 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2023 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2024 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)
2025 (Jan–Jun · Jul–Dec)

newsletters

... image: Route78

Voord

I've been doing some research into Doctor Who monsters recently, and have been improving them one by one. I'd like your input on the Voord. As of now, I feel every entry we have at present meets the notability guidelines in some way shape or form, and I feel strongly that Voord is really the only entry that's very debateable notability-wise right now. The bulk of its content is different authors describing the Voord's physical appearance with no additional commentary, or summarizing their spin-off appearances. Their actual Reception is very brief and very light, and beyond what's in the article, I've only found one SIGCOV source, Once Upon a Time Lord: The Myths and Stories of Doctor Who: [1], which is very solid, but compared to what are basically TRIVIALMENTIONS in the other sources, I'm not sure there's enough to hold up an article here.

Given your familiarity with the First Doctor's era and its associated topics, I figured I'd ask for your input before I took any action in regard to the Voord's article. If you would be willing, would you please let me know your thoughts on how this article should be handled going forward? I'd greatly appreciate your input in how to tackle this. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 02:28, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pokelego999: Good to hear from you. It's been a while since I looked into The Keys of Marinus, so I imagine you're likely more knowledgeable about the topic at this point. You're right that most of the commentary seems fairly trivial and focused on the Voord's physical appearance; it's still interesting, but not particularly significant. If you think merging is the right call, that seems logical to me; anything salvageable can be merged with the list and/or the serial. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 01:44, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhain thank you for the input! I feel like a merge is likely for the best; I'll see what content is more relevant to one article or the other before doing any merging, but I'll try to get it done soon.

If it's not too much, could I ask for your input on Mechonoid? I discussed this with the original creator and they seem confident on its notability, and unlike the Voord, the article does actually have some actual commentary on the real-world impact of the Mechonoids. My main gripe is it seems almost to be entirely within the scope of the The Chase. I was originally going to discuss this only with the creator, but I feel it'd be wise to get an outside perspective before I proceed with anything, since I feel me and them are likely going to disagree on how to handle the article. If you feel it's fine enough standalone, I'll likely leave it as is, but I'm admittedly not too sure myself right now, so I wanted to discuss this before I made up my mind on it. Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 04:11, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I can see both perspectives, but I think I agree with you; most of the content at Mechonoid is simply about their appearance in The Chase, followed by a mostly-unsourced proseline-style list of their subsequent appearance. It could certainly use some work, if not a merge, but I'll leave that to you and trust that you'll approach the project or other appropriate venues for discussion when doing so. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 05:49, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I plan to use the proper channels in regards to these two articles. Thank you so much for your input, as it's helped me a lot with figuring out how to handle these two articles. Happy editing! Magneton Considerer: Pokelego999 (Talk) (Contribs) 22:40, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah, I've no doubt you know what you're doing, but I imagine you'll face more opposition with Mechonoid than Voord so wanted to make sure. Always happy to help! Keep up the good work. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 22:45, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Slender The Eight Pages logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Slender The Eight Pages logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bella Ramsey

Hi @Rhain. Just wanted to introduce myself following my post on the Bella Ramsey talk page. I don't have any connection to Bella but I was brought up in the same area as them (I now live in SW London). I'd be happy to provide help and input as needed. Just to provide a further example of what I can help with, I've drafted the below for a TV series that isn't included in the career section. Just let me know what would work best. Thanks!

In 2023, Ramsey portrayed Kelsey Morgan, a pregnant heroin addict, in the second series of Jimmy McGovern’s acclaimed prison drama Time. Their performance was widely praised by critics and audiences alike, culminating in Ramsey winning the Royal Television Society Award for Best Supporting Actress in 2024.[1] [2]

[1] Golby, Joel (28 October 2023). Time series two: Bella Ramsey is incredible in this world-beating drama". The Guardian. Retrieved 16 July 2025.

[2] "Winners announced for the RTS Programme Awards 2024". Royal Television Society. Retrieved 16 July 2025. Crp74 (talk) 09:49, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Crp74: Thanks for reaching out—I've added some information. I mostly monitor Ramsey's article, rather than actively work on it, but happy to help wherever possible. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 09:57, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's great. Thanks @Rhain. I'm new to all this so is the best way to suggest text in the article talk page and then you'll add (or not!) as you see fit? Or is there a better approach (i.e. is there someone else more actively working on the page that I should reach out to?). Sorry for all the questions! Crp74 (talk) 13:23, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologise. The best place is probably the article's talk page, as you've done; someone may see it and address it eventually. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 21:27, 16 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Always precious

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:09, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all that you do, and for continuing to represent the best of us. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 05:12, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bella Ramsey opening and early life sections

Hi @Rhain. I've worked on the opening two sections of Bella's wiki page and I thought it might be best to set out the changes in my sandbox User:Crp74/sandbox - Wikipedia with an explanation of the proposed changes and corrections. I thought this might be easiest for you to simply copy what you would like across rather than pasting lots of text in the main talk page. Let me know if this works for you. Crp74 (talk) 15:13, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Crp74: Thanks for taking this approach! I've implemented some of your changes, but avoided some unnecessary references and the more promotional-sounding language. Let me know if you have any concerns. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 23:00, 23 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhain: Thanks for making the changes so quickly! I'm planning to work on the career section this weekend and will let you know when I've finished that. Just one potential grammar typo in the text you added. Should it be: "At age 10, Ramsey joined the Television Workshop in Nottingham, which provided training and support for early auditions, including for Game of Thrones." (changes in bold). Crp74 (talk) 08:38, 25 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bella Ramsey: Career and Personal life sections

@Rhain: I hope things are well with you. I had more time this weekend than I was expecting. So I've set out some suggested changes in User:Crp74/sandbox for both sections with some questions for you to consider when you have time. Let me know what you think! Crp74 (talk) 09:34, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate the message; hope you're doing well! I've incorporated some of the suggestions. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 23:07, 27 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Slender The Arrival website logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Slender The Arrival website logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 29 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a moment,

I would appreciate it if you could check out Braxe + Falcon, an article I'm considering for GAN. Besides that, I notice you've got two episodes of this past season of TLoU up at GAN yourself—I will try my best to watch for these to start their reviews and hope to help you tackle concerns where I can. Hope you've been doing well, for all that you do in that particular subject area truly is a singular spectacle unmatched by hardly any other editor. Happy editing—Barnt Toust 03:25, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate the kind words! Hope you're doing well. Looks like that article is in great shape—shouldn't take much to earn that green plus. – Rhain ☔ (he/him) 22:20, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your copyedits to the article, glad to hear you think it's looking swell. I look forward to the next GARC cycle! Barnt Toust 23:27, 30 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]