User talk:Rafaelthegreat

This is Rafaelthegreat's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: David Thomas King School (May 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AllCatsAreGrey was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

See WP:ORG and WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. With the current sources, the article's topic cannot be deemed sufficiently notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:David Thomas King School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– AllCatsAreGrey ^(talk) 23:22, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

sorry this is my first time making an article

(I made this because I go to this school) Rafaelthegreat (talk) 22:17, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Rafael, no need to apologize! I appreciate the effort you put into the draft. Just because the draft didn't qualify for a Wikipedia article now doesn't mean it can't qualify for one in the future.

If you want to contribute to other parts of Wikipedia I recommend getting started here. Happy editing! – AllCatsAreGrey ^(talk) 14:55, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Rafaelthegreat! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – AllCatsAreGrey ^(talk) 23:22, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Salish Matter (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CoconutOctopus was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Salish Matter and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CoconutOctopus talk 16:22, 21 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, I'm Patient Zero. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to LGBTQ people—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Patient Zero^talk 23:29, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is it okay to write it as their identity? Rafaelthegreat (talk) 23:44, 3 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]