User talk:QuietArchivist19

Hello, I wanted to follow up on my earlier post.

The "Criticism" section in the Isaac Shalom article cites one perspective, but it contradicts broader, documented historical accounts of Shalom’s role in preserving Sephardic traditions and strengthening the Brooklyn Syrian Jewish community. For example, Isaac Shalom helped establish Magen David Yeshivah, an institution specifically created to maintain Sephardic heritage when limited options existed.

Sources documenting this include:

ImageUSA: Isaac Shalom A”H and Other Community Members Who Helped Establish MDY

New York Times obituary for Isaac Shalom (1968), which highlights his leadership in communal and educational affairs.

You want to be saying this at Talk:Isaac Shalom; other interested editors will be able to help you there. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 20:26, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help! QuietArchivist19 (talk) 21:05, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the article should be revised to better reflect the full historical record. I welcome other editors' thoughts. Thank you!

Welcome!

Hi QuietArchivist19! I noticed your contributions to Isaac Shalom and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Drmies (talk) 15:14, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Isaac Shalom, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 15:15, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Drmies,

I noticed that the "Criticism" section includes material about Isaac Shalom that seems inaccurate. According to ImageUSA, Shalom was instrumental in preserving Sephardic traditions by founding Magen David Yeshivah when few options existed.

I respectfully propose removing the unsourced criticism and replacing it with properly sourced information. Here’s a citation for reference: https://imageusa.com/isaac-shalom-ah-and-other-community-members-who-helped-establish-mdy-2/

Please let me know your thoughts. Thank you! QuietArchivist19 (talk) 15:41, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Isaac Shalom. Drmies (talk) 15:19, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing certain pages (Isaac Shalom) for persistant removal of sourced content, refusal to seek the talk page.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 15:25, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

QuietArchivist19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a new editor and I now understand that changes to biographies, especially removals of material, should first be discussed on the article's Talk page. I have posted on the Talk page to seek consensus. I respectfully request unblock so I can participate constructively. Thank you. QuietArchivist19 (talk) 18:11, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You can participate on the article talk page until you've demonstrated that you can participate constructively. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:26, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

QuietArchivist19 (talk) 18:11, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

QuietArchivist19 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have posted a constructive and sourced concern on the Isaac Shalom article's Talk page regarding the existing content. I now understand the need to seek consensus on article changes, and I am committed to following Wikipedia's procedures going forward. I respectfully request an unblock so I can continue participating properly. Thank you. QuietArchivist19 (talk) 21:15, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

No. It's much, much too soon. Once you have a history of constructive and accepted edit requests on that article's talk page, then and only then should you be contesting your block. Yamla (talk) 21:28, 28 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.