User talk:Questionadora ávida
About last editions...
[edit]Look, what you're doing with the article doesn't make sense because it talks about the Swaziland's delegation on that date. What you're adding is untimely. It's as if we were talking about the participation of the delegations from Thailand and Ethiopia without a timeline when they were once called Siam and Abyssinia. What I see is that you're going to want to make a cross-examination of (now country X) in all the articles, and that breaks the timeline. Please don't pull off untimely stunts. You know that's the kind of edits that got you kicked off the Portuguese Wikipedia. Please use common sense and don't insist. Taichi (talk) 22:15, 3 June 2025 (UTC)
- The reversion is still unjustified, look at the article about Dahomey at the 1972 Summer Games, the article literally starts with "Dahomey (now Benin). The edits on the Swaziland page were just following the pattern of this article, but of course it's much easier and more convenient for you to judge me by the edits on the Portuguese Wikipedia (which you probably only went to for a cursory analysis, since you never mentioned exactly what kind of edits I made there outside the blocking outlines). And please stop harassing me and leave my edits alone, no one is complaining but you (apart from one wrong edit I made on the page about trans rights in the UK, but other than that no one else complained). Questionadora ávida (talk) 08:19, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but you can't call it "harassment" if you did something wrong on another project. There's a saying that "birds can't shoot guns" so I'd appreciate it if you know your place. If you make a controversial edit, it's my duty to point it out to you. I don't intend to be silent or censored by your warnings. That applies to any project. I won't be held responsible if another user points out more errors. That's the last thing I'll warn you about, so you don't get ideas later about reversing the scenarios and favoring you with phantoms of "harassment". Taichi (talk) 16:49, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Please understand one thing: it doesn't matter what I did on the Portuguese Wikipedia or the Spanish Wikipedia, what matters is what I did here on the English Wikipedia. I appreciate you pointing out my edits, but I will not accept being treated as if I were a mere article vandal. If you and the other users had treated me like a decent human being instead of just punishing me, there would be no problems and I would have fixed my edits without any problems. Pay attention to what I'm about to say: There are ways to point out someone's mistakes without making them feel horrible about themselves. A user on the Spanish Wikipedia did exactly that to me, and I thanked him for treating me more understandingly. Questionadora ávida (talk) 17:12, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but you can't call it "harassment" if you did something wrong on another project. There's a saying that "birds can't shoot guns" so I'd appreciate it if you know your place. If you make a controversial edit, it's my duty to point it out to you. I don't intend to be silent or censored by your warnings. That applies to any project. I won't be held responsible if another user points out more errors. That's the last thing I'll warn you about, so you don't get ideas later about reversing the scenarios and favoring you with phantoms of "harassment". Taichi (talk) 16:49, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Furthermore, it is extremely hypocritical of you to come and talk to me about "common sense", when the English Wikipedia clearly uses "ESWATINI" and not "Swaziland" (with exceptions such as on the pages about the Olympic Games, since the country competed in them for many years as "Swaziland"). I will make the same argument that you used on the Spanish Wikipedia, do not change Wikipedia to favor your arguments. Questionadora ávida (talk) 16:44, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
- Okay, I see these kinds of answers got you kicked off in the other project. Be happy and celebrate here then. Surely someone from here will point you out in the future. Let's see if the "avid questioner" attitude works here and they believe you. I won't bother you anymore here. Taichi (talk) 16:54, 4 June 2025 (UTC)
I have sent you an e-mail
[edit]
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Hi Questionadora ávida! I have sent you an e-mail with a request I made there. Can you complete it please? Thanks, Pawel PDoro (talk) 14:11, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- Okay Questionadora ávida (talk) 14:48, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Questionadora ávida Ok. Thank you so much... PDoro (talk) 14:48, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Questionadora ávida You still didn't started and completed the article. Can you make the request now? Thanks PDoro (talk) 15:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- The article in Nahuatl is actually already ready. Questionadora ávida (talk) 21:28, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- Ok. Thanks PDoro (talk) 21:33, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- The article in Nahuatl is actually already ready. Questionadora ávida (talk) 21:28, 16 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Questionadora ávida You still didn't started and completed the article. Can you make the request now? Thanks PDoro (talk) 15:33, 15 June 2025 (UTC)
- @Questionadora ávida Ok. Thank you so much... PDoro (talk) 14:48, 15 June 2025 (UTC)