User talk:Pyrotec

This user may have left Wikipedia. Pyrotec has not edited Wikipedia since 6 June 2022. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

edit count | edit summary usage

Archives

07Q4 - 08Q1 - 8Q2 - 08Q3 - 08Q4 - 09Q1 - 09Q2 - 09Q3 - 09Q4 - 10Q1 - 10Q2 - 10Q3 - 10Q4 - 11Q1 - 11Q2 - 11Q3 - 11Q4 - 12Q1 - 12Q2 - 12Q3 - 12Q4 - 13Q1 - 13Q2 - 13Q3 - 13Q4 - 14Q1 - 14Q2 - 14Q3 - 14Q4 - 15Q1 - 15Q2 - 15Q3 - 19 - 20 - 21 - 22

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by .

Good article reassessment for Blackdown Hills

Blackdown Hills has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 02:17, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Antonio Paoli

Antonio Paoli has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Wannabe rockstar (talk) 19:54, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Ebbw Valley Railway

Ebbw Valley Railway has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 05:54, 3 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Lord Howe Island

Lord Howe Island has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:37, 25 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Rain

Rain has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:53, 4 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good article reassessment for Strensham services

Strensham services has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 14:12, 14 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]