Jump to content

User talk:Pyramids09

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Happy First Edit Day!

[edit]

Happy First Edit Day!

[edit]
Hey, Pyramids09. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!
Have a great day! RPE ✍️ 📚 05:54, 19 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 May 2025

[edit]
And comment is requested on a privacy whitepaper.
And other courtroom drama.
And how he knows it: all about lawyer letters and editing logs.
Why the language barrier is not the only impediment to navigating sources from another culture.
And QR codes for every page!
When an editor is ready to become staff at a public library (not a brother in a fraternity).
Rest in peace.
The technology behind it, and the other stuff.
Gadzooks!
And more.
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits

[edit]

I suggest you stop your disgusting attempt to downplay the genocide in Gaza, to conflate Zionism with Judaism and to whitewash Israel's criminality. Maybe that would stop half your edits from being reverted. If you continue down this path, I will pursue action against you. Oneequalsequalsone (talk | contribs) 06:51, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read WP:PA before trying to be edgy. Pyramids09 (talk) 09:22, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not being edgy. If you can't face the reality of the appalling crimes you are trying to whitewash and continue to discredit facts, I will act on it. Oneequalsequalsone (talk | contribs) 11:29, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, I suggest you read WP:PA before continuing to harass me out of nowhere. Leave with grace, or I will alert ANI. Go. Pyramids09 (talk) 22:46, 20 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 June 2025

[edit]
Admins arrested in Belarus.
Pardon our alliteration!
A get-out-of-jail card!
And other new research publications.
Holy men and not-as-holy movies.
Get your self-nomination in by July 2nd!
After two years RuWiki fails to thrive.
With some sweet-and-sour sauce!
Every thing you need to know about the Wikimedia Foundation?
Egad!
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 July 2025

[edit]
Endowment tax form, Wikimania, elections, U4C, fundraising and a duck!
And how do we know?
Five-year journey comes to healthy fruition.
Wikimedians from around the world will gather in person and online at the twentieth annual meeting of Wikimania.
As well as "hermeneutic excursions" and other scientific research findings.
The report covers the Foundation's operations from July 2023 - June 2024
A step towards objective and comprehensive coverage of a project nearly too big to follow.
Drawn this century!
How data from the Wikipedia "necessary articles" lists can shed new light on the gender gap
Annual plans, external trends, infrastructure, equity, safety, and effectiveness. What does it all mean?
Rest in peace.
Wouldn't it be nice without billionaires, scandals, deaths, and wars?
If you are too blasé for Mr. Blasé and don't give a FAC.
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:51, 18 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

The following sanction now applies to you:

Topic-banned from WP:PIA

You have been sanctioned for persistent driveby POV edits, lack of accountability to other editors and failure to stick to verifiable statements from sources

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at WP:ARBPIA5#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the appeal process. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything above is unclear to you. ~~~~

In particular, I came to this conclusion based on recent edits at Hamas, and at Masada myth. In the former, you added "far-right" despite none of the present sources including that characterization, and without adding any new sources. In the latter, you re-added a POV tag that had already been extensively disputed on the talk page. In neither case did you include an adequate edit summary or attempt to engage on the talk page, whether before or after your edit. Mirroring the edit at Hamas, at Flag of Israel you added Category:Flags of indigenous peoples (without any edit summary) despite the article making no mention of indigenous/indigeneity anywhere in its prose. In a similar vein, at this edit to Palestinians you removed sourced content that had previously been challenged by you and upheld by other editors following discussion (Talk page archive); you should have been well aware that this edit would be contentious and require discussion, and you did not respond when called out about it. This pattern of making potentially contentious edits with a consistent POV includes other edits that are perhaps more defensible, such as Special:Diff/1301996535 or Special:Diff/1296438908, but which similarly lack adequate summaries or talk page engagement in the event of conflict with other editors. On one of the few occasions where you do include an edit summary in your recent edits, you did so to propose an OR argument.

Having read through your most recent page of contributions there were myriad other examples of subpar PIA edits along these lines. The problem isn't your personal POV, it's that you're clearly editing with reference primarily to your personal POV rather than following RS, and you're doing it in a way that appears to be intentionally dodging accountability to your fellow editors. Given that you have previously been sanctioned for subpar engagement in the PIA topic area, I see no option other than topic-banning you from it entirely. signed, Rosguill talk 17:14, 6 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 9 August 2025

[edit]
Plus a mysterious CheckUser incident, and the news with Wikinews.
A review of June, July and August.
Who is this guy?
Threads since June.
And slop.
It's not a conlang, it's a crossword puzzle.
gang aft agley, an' lea'e us nought but grief an' pain, for promis'd joy!
Everybody's Somebody's Fool.
* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 9 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Pyramids09&oldid=1304939180"