User talk:Pur 0 0

Sri Lanka

I undid your edit per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Linking. Regards--Chanaka L (talk) 09:31, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And your edit was undone long back by someone else, and it has stayed ever since. I guess I was right this whole time haha. Pur 0 0 (talk) 19:19, 10 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

IAST Punjabi

Can you check Amrita Pritam's name transliteration is correct or not. Bairagi Ram (talk) 21:11, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is no transliteration given on the page. Though if there was one, it should be Amṛtā Prītama. Pur 0 0 (talk) 19:12, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[Əੰm੍ɾਿt̪ਾ p੍ɾੀt̪m

I am talking about this one Bairagi Ram (talk) 13:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is called IPA. I'm sorry, but I don't know how to transliterate that. Especially not this one, since I don't know Punjabi alphabet. Pur 0 0 (talk) 13:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem....! Thanks Bairagi Ram (talk) 10:19, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of governors of Uttar Pradesh, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page United Provinces. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 21:36, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Delhi Technological University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahom rebellion has been accepted

Ahom rebellion, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for the article. I am still confused about the geographic location of the events: the article mentions the rebellion taking place in Rangpur, Bangladesh, but at the same time talks about "British rule in Assam" and Rangpur, Assam was the capital of the Ahom kingdom, and appears to be much closer to the Naga hills. Would it be possible to clarify this point? Thanks a lot! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 15:48, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi.

You're correct. It was in Rangpur, Assam. When I was linking the article, the Rangpur of Assam was not coming in the link, so I thought Rangpur is only in Bangladesh. I have corrected it. Pur 0 0 (talk) 11:04, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ISO

Where does WP policy state that the very confusing ISO transliteration that you have added en masse to many articles is required? If you want to make these changes, start an RfC at WT:INDIA and attempt to achieve a consensus, but before doing so, please undo your edits. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 15:35, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the policy that textboxes have a field to be filled, and for because of that one rule I myself hate we have to use ISO 15919 instead of indic scripts. Below it says to use IPA. If you find ISO very confusing, I don't think you'll be able to handle IPA. Pur 0 0 (talk) 03:17, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flags in Infoboxes

Please read MOS:INFOBOXFLAG and undo your edits. If you keep doing this, you are looking at penalties. Best regards Fowler&fowler «Talk» 15:59, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those are banners, not flags. It's the same as using emblems, except with more uniformity in size and shape. Pur 0 0 (talk) 18:49, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited BIMSTEC, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nepalese language.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Pur 0 0 (talk) 10:34, 1 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you help with editing.

Hello. Can you help with editing bhumihar article. I'll provide you reference. Like: they are also called Babu Saheb, because of their landlordship. Reference: https://zeenews.india.com/hindi/india/bihar-jharkhand/patna/how-did-bhumihars-originate-landholdings-like-rajputs-and-claim-to-be-descendants-of-brahmins/2413490 $govindsinghbabhan$ (talk) 15:26, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done Pur 0 0 (talk) 15:28, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks sir $govindsinghbabhan$ (talk) 15:34, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Pur 0 0

Mention something in History section.

It was the capacity of the Benares ruler to mount an exhausting guerilla war against the Nawab of Awadh. With the help of his bhumhar clan levies.

Source https://books.google.co.in/books?id=xfo3AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA18&redir_esc=y&fbclid=PAY2xjawJ4s5pleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABp3HyIyzmFXcNot1OTMhqo0mbi3ADie3893GGv9ZZjV_TCrUojcCNOqlN89tj_aem_sWvn1oUp9vqG0qAkefr81A#v=onepage&q&f=true

This marked the revolution of 1781 (i,e, 76 years before the first war of mutiny in 1857).

Date source https://www.jstor.org/stable/44147866

I have given second source because it includes date. $govindsinghbabhan$ (talk) 18:36, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your user page may not meet Wikipedia's user page guidelines. It is intended for basic information about yourself, your interests and goals as they relate to editing Wikipedia, as well as disclosures of conflicts of interest and paid editing. Although a lot of freedom is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not:

an encyclopedia article (and should not be styled to look like one)
a workspace for a draft article
a personal website, blog, or social media site
a space for self-promotion or other advertising
a CV, resumé or lengthy autobiography

The user page guidelines have additional information on what is and what is not considered acceptable content. Please use your user sandbox or the draft article space to practice editing or to create new articles. Thank you. CycloneYoris ^talk! 11:23, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Does it look alright now? Pur 0 0 (talk) 13:40, 9 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Bhumihar wikipedia [Etymology section for Babhan] complete the phrase......

Reference citation which you just cited under bhumihar wikipedia reference was not Good as they say they Generally don't consider such news articles. Point is I am referring to inclusion of Already cited kumar Aswani cited Academic Source which is explaining the meaning of Babhan term [pg:126 From 6th Line To 16th Line] Same Acadmic citation covering almost part what we thought about it. [Put it in under the Etymology section with Already cited Academic Source by replacing this cheaper dubious line Babhan is an apbharansa for .....). Done! 👍 103.88.57.34 (talk) 18:08, 16 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Hello, I had auto watched your talkpage when I nominated your page for deletion and I noticed that you made a personal attack against me when you removed the deletion notification. You are required to assume good faith or it will be taken as disruption of Wikipedia and reported. For the record, you were the sole person in that discussion out of 4 independent editors who believed the page should remain. Removing any non-vandalism message from talk pages is also frowned upon, you can set up WP:ARCHIVING if you wish to hide old messages. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:51, 25 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of EdTech Impact for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article EdTech Impact is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EdTech Impact until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Junbeesh (talk) 11:25, 8 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Laxmi Narayan Meena for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laxmi Narayan Meena is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laxmi Narayan Meena until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

REAL_MOUSE_IRL talk 09:29, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But the article was reviewed one month ago (23 June if I remember correctly). Why the sudden change of mind? Pur 0 0 (talk) 10:06, 31 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

August 2025

Hello Pur 0 0. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Pur 0 0. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Pur 0 0|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Bilby (talk) 10:53, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. My edits are purely based on my own interests, which I make on

1. Topics I find interest in

2. Topics that have received significant coverage but do not have an article (whether it meets GNG is decided by the moderators/administrators, as they have a better understanding on the topic)

3. Topics which can be expanded with a deeper excavation for citations

The articles I create are not promotional, considering my recent article, Royal Honey VIP is based on criticising the product. Zero Poverty Uttar Pradesh Campaign also contains a section about the limitations of the campaign.

Overall, whatever topic I write about, I write both in favour of and against depending on the sources. The fact that the recent edits have sounded promotional is purely coincidence, as there have been many instances in my 1,200+ edits when I've followed on a pattern.

In case any of my edits seem promotional, feel free to revert them. I will not object. Thanks and cheers. Pur 0 0 (talk) 11:16, 1 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]