User talk:Pomisolomon
Thanks for your contributions to Lark & Berry. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is a product of paid editing. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —Alalch E. 12:46, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello Pomisolomon. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Lark & Berry, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Pomisolomon. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Pomisolomon|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.
Your history of editing whereby you made some perfunctory edits to WP:PGAME the ability to create an article directly, and then your first substantive edit was a promotionaly-worded aticle about a company that relies on sponsored content, press releases, and is overall refbombed shows that you are a paid editor. —Alalch E. 12:51, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Discospinster Hi, you've seen this article, which I've draftified. What's your opinion here? —Alalch E. 12:54, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- It's likely that there's some kind of conflict but it doesn't completely bar the editor from creating the article, we just have to keep an eye out for promotional content. Many of the sources cited are PR in some form or another, but there are a couple of independent sources. I think there needs to be more though. ... discospinster talk 21:34, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
I would like to clarify that I have no financial compensation or personal connection related to the article I created. My intention is solely to provide information about the subject. Pomisolomon (talk) 08:41, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. —Alalch E. 14:04, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Lark & Berry. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. — Saqib (talk I contribs) 19:00, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Pomisolomon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ottomon Hands, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:11, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Hello, Pomisolomon. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Ottomon Hands".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 16:27, 5 May 2025 (UTC)
The page Draft:Ottomon Hands has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Wikipedia:Deletion review. UtherSRG (talk) 12:13, 10 May 2025 (UTC)