User talk:PeterShaw1999

Welcome!

Hello, PeterShaw1999, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:PeterShaw1999/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

Article development
Standard layout
Lead section
The perfect article
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 09:17, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:PeterShaw1999/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:PeterShaw1999/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 09:17, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raúl Gutiérrez-Sánchez (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ProClasher97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raúl Gutiérrez-Sánchez and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 09:35, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PeterShaw1999! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ProClasher97 ~ Have A Question? 09:35, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SRCNet (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by QEnigma were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SRCNet and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

QEnigma talk 09:41, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jesus Salgado (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

In addition to the above, LinkedIn is not a reliable source so should not be used.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jesus Salgado and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 14:42, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, PeterShaw1999. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 17:36, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi PeterShaw1999, if you have a COI, you need to declare it or you work for an affiliated institution, then you need to make the WP:PAID disclosure. Either way, neither preclude from creating and submitting drafts but there are special rules for articles so do read the message.

I see you updated Draft:Jesus Salgado but when you did you removed the decline message. As noted on the message, those should stay so I have restored it which also gives you the ability to resubmit it. If you are ready for it to be reviewed again, click the blue Resubmit button and another review will take a look. S0091 (talk) 17:42, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

As astronomer, I know the work of the people and organisations I am trying to document in wikipedia pages. I have started with ESA, then SKAO and I was planning to continue with CDS (Strasbourg astronomical Data Center), HEASARC (High Energy Astrophysics Science Archive Research Center) and other astronomical data providers, including the more prominent members and contact points. Maybe it was too ambitious but this activity is poorly covered by wikipedia (the observatories have sometimes a page but the data provider institutions, essential for the science production, are not represented)

Sorry about the decline message. I did not realised this was inside the text. PeterShaw1999 (talk) 07:11, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. I suggest reading Your first article. S0091 (talk) 13:51, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I did it. Most of the references are secondary ones (and independent, including peer review and indexes of paper and citations). About the independent, the connection is that I am astronomer and I know the institutions because I use the data and services from then to do science but I tend to think it is like if a journalist (not working for The Times) creates a page describing "The Times". I have started a series of publications to cover the astronomical data providers but it looks that this is not going good, maybe because the subject is not considered important. I imagine it is easier to create bios o PeterShaw1999 (talk) 14:01, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

of known people involved in other more contexts than in scientific areas PeterShaw1999 (talk) 15:07, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]