User talk:Orion123478

February 2023

Thank you for your contributions. One of your recent contributions to Canada's Wonderland has been reverted or removed, because it contains speculative or unconfirmed information about a future event. Please only add material about future events if it is verifiable, based on a reliable source. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 01:53, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The information is public knowledge released by the park, it opens in may Orion123478 (talk) 02:07, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are jumping the gun. We can't write as if it has already happened. Same thing you did here, which has been reverted. We are waiting until the park opens. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 04:57, 28 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Cedar Point, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Wait until the park has opened and the rides are confirmed to be operating. New coasters often get delayed. Stop jumping the gun, there's no prize for being the first to edit. —JlACEer (talk) 15:38, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Kings Island—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 21:48, 13 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm GoneIn60. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Flying Ace Aerial Chase, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. See Wikipedia:Citing sources and referencing for beginners if you need help. Also keep in mind that you've been warned about this numerous times already. Cite a source for edits like this one, and don't write about future events as if they've already occurred. If you would like to discuss further, begin a new discussion at the article's talk page. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 04:52, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello, I'm Dorsetonian. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to List of Intamin rides have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Dorsetonian (talk) 21:33, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Dorsetonian. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Intamin have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Dorsetonian (talk) 21:36, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing rides based on website status

Generally, we shouldn't remove rides based on website status. Sometimes rides are removed because they are going to be undergoing long-term maintenance. Other times, the website itself could be undergoing an overhaul and mistakenly removed a ride in the process (and is later re-added). Removal from the site is not a guarantee the ride is permanently gone. It is better to wait for an official announcement, or at the very least, wait for the next season to begin where the ride's removal will likely be covered by a secondary source. I've left your changes at Six Flags America in place for now, but please keep this in mind for future reference. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 20:18, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok cool Orion123478 (talk) 21:25, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Appreciate your diligence updating park and coaster articles, but you will need to start adding sources as you go. In this edit for example, you added a claim about the name change, which definitely requires a citation. Per WP:Verifiability, "any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material". If you need help with adding references to articles, please see referencing for beginners, and you can also ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Please go back to Woodstock's Air Rail and add a reference for that claim. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 18:24, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blackpool Pleasure Beach

Although the park has now been renamed to Pleasure Beach Resort, that doesn't mean you need to go into all the old ride articles, such as Ghost Train (Blackpool Pleasure Beach) and move them to a new name. I feel this is unnecessary. At the time the ride existed, the park name was Blackpool Pleasure Beach, so the name of the article should reflect that. Redirects will take readers to the updated name, and that is perfectly fine. -- GoneIn60 (talk) 23:39, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok, what about the current rides? Orion123478 (talk) 23:45, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be more appropriate for current rides, thanks. --GoneIn60 (talk) 02:11, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok cool Orion123478 (talk) 15:36, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And while we're on the subject, please don't move railway station articles without evidence that the name has changed. It can cause serious knock-on effects doktorb _words^deeds 01:39, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your page move as it seems Blackpool Pleasure Beach remains the WP:COMMONNAME. Should you wish to discuss further please follow the WP:RM process. Thanks. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 11:21, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:08, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Project 305

I see that you made some contributions to the newly moved Project 305 page. Do we know for certain that the coaster is getting renamed? It looks to me like there are some changes coming and those changes are currently known as "Project 305" according to KD's website. However, it seems to me that is the title of the project — not the name of coaster. Have we seen any sources that indicate the coaster is going to be renamed?—JlACEer (talk) 18:56, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I refer that change the name into Troll's Trollercoaster

Hello, there!!! I see you got edits on the articles on Universal Studios Florida!!! And the point is, I refer that change the name into "Troll's Trollercoaster" in the section of DreamWorks Land at Universal Studios Florida!!!

Because it seems that I remember about how "KidZone" must be permanently closed to make way for "DreamWorks Land", including "Po Live!", "Shrek's Swamp Meet" and "Troll's Trollercoaster"!!!

Okay? So, good luck with that!!! And a Happy Leap Day!!! Hiperjavier2006 (talk) 16:22, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh oops I didn’t see that part lol Orion123478 (talk) 21:24, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Snoopy and Six Flags

You recently edited the article Peanuts to claim that Snoopy is now the mascot at all Six Flags parks. However, you added no source to claim that. If you have a source that says that Snoopy will become a mascot at the pre-existing Six Flags park, please add that reference. Otherwise, please adjust your edit accordingly. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 04:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Six Flags (1961–2025)

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, the introduction of inappropriate pages, such as Six Flags (1961–2025), is considered vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CycloneYoris ^talk! 21:15, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Six Flags

Do not move pages like you did to Six Flags (1961-2024) especially if has been agreed upon on the pages, and if you're going to do so without first discussing it. DisneyAviationRollerCoasterEnthusiast (talk) 21:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roar (roller coaster), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Firebird. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 31 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dinosaurs Alive! (attraction), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Zambezi Zinger.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 22 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Six Flags Great Adventure

Hello,

With all the changes happening at this park, I appreciate that you are working to keep things up to date. However, you still need to include reliable sources for the claims that you make. I've reverted your change putting Dare Devil Dive into "former attractions", and also your changes saying that the Golden Kingdom is now defunct, since these were unsourced. Demolition permits alone probably do not constitute a reliable source; we should wait for official word from the park, especially since the page for the ride is still up. ZLima12 (talk) 21:51, 31 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Demolition permits were filed, it’s marked defunct on log ride

Coliwood descovered it Orion123478 (talk) 03:28, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I saw the demo permits and edited it because the park won’t announce stuff to public

stupid Zimmerman lol

sry Orion123478 (talk) 03:39, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

February 2025

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Canada's Wonderland, you may be blocked from editing. Just because a YouTuber said that Time Warp is demolished and provided photo and video evidence of it does not mean that Time Warp is actually demolished. We still need official confirmation from the park themselves or from reliable news media first. Oh, and Time Warp is still listed on the official Canada's Wonderland website. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 00:21, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Omg your so annoying, if it’s being demolished then it’s not coming back

I saw a video of demolition, maybe you should stop editing Orion123478 (talk) 03:30, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Orion123478. Personal knowledge, including things you saw, read or heard about is not admissable as a source. It is considered a form of original research which is not allowed. Videos on YouTube are also generally not considered as acceptable for WP:RS purposes. Your contributions are appreciated, but please take some time to ensure that any claims of fact, beyond obvious things, are properly cited. Thank you. -Ad Orientem (talk) 19:57, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. It's just that I have worded Wikipedia policy poorly and that Orion's contributions are appreciated but require proper citations. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 21:18, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fast Lane (Six Flags), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Time Warp.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oopsies

i I meant for the ride time warp Orion123478 (talk) 01:57, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trolls' Trollercoaster moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Trolls' Trollercoaster, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AgerJoy talk 17:09, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced changes to Kings Island and other articles

In this edit and others like it, you are explaining that there is a source out there. However, it is your responsibility to supply the source on Wikipedia. We can't rely on edit summaries as a reason or source for the change. I understand from some of your explanations above that minor removals are not highly-publicized. That is true. In those cases where you can't find a reliable source, we'll need to wait until the ride is no longer listed on the park's website. Currently, it's still there (link).

And finally, we should wait to remove the ride from the main article until its removal is complete, from both the park and the park's website. --GoneIn60 (talk) 17:28, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Idk how to source a social media comment, if I did i would’ve added the source Orion123478 (talk) 17:42, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Social media accounts/postings are not typically preferred on Wikipedia. If it ends up being the only one, we can use it, but we should wait a bit to see if any news sources pick it up. Once we've settled on the source, you can add a sentence to the existing KI article that the ride is scheduled for removal in 2025, and then cite that source. Once the ride is completely gone, we can then move the entry over to List of former Kings Island attractions. Thanks. --GoneIn60 (talk) 17:47, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

And cool, will do!! Orion123478 (talk) 17:50, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I didn't see anything posted on Kings Island's X (Twitter) account. Where did you see it? --GoneIn60 (talk) 17:48, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Instagram, they made a comment on someone’s post asking if the ride would open this season Orion123478 (talk) 17:49, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Someone’s comment on kings island’s post* Orion123478 (talk) 17:49, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

OK, yeah a comment in a thread is not going to be acceptable here. We need an official post that was meant to be seen by the masses. They may add something to the KI Blog eventually or X. If not, we'll just have to wait until it's gone from the ride listing page. --GoneIn60 (talk) 17:52, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Another missing source

At Kings Dominion, you added information again without providing a source. I went ahead and did it for you this time, but you'll need to start doing this on your own, or you may eventually lose your editing privileges. Look at what I did in this edit and be sure to read WP:REFB and WP:CITE. If you need more help, you can ask questions at the Teahouse or reach out to me on my talk page (though my time on Wikipedia will be limited over the next month or so). Take this opportunity to make sourcing a habit. It is a critical skill to learn on Wikipedia. --GoneIn60 (talk) 06:06, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Dare Devil Dive

Why was this article moved to Dare Devil Dive (roller coaster)? Is there another "Dare Devil Dive" out there? --GoneIn60 (talk) 18:20, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Six flags calls a lot of their Skycoasters Dare Devil Dive Orion123478 (talk) 18:30, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks for the clarification. A disambig page probably needs to be created then called Dare Devil Dive (instead of the redirect) that lists the possible destinations users might be looking for when searching that term. It could look like something similar to this page: Diamondback. -- GoneIn60 (talk) 20:15, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March 2025

Stop removing rides/attractions from amusement park articles or changing them to the status of "Removed". You are clearly struggling to get these right. Your recent edits at La Ronde were reverted for making an incorrect claim that the ride was removed from the park's website. Even when rides disappear from park sites, there's still no guarantee the ride is being (or was) removed. Park websites occasionally contain errors. Other times, the ride may have been removed while undergoing refurbishment, such as what happened with the Grand Ole Carousel. You changed that ride to "Removed" status here and also removed it from the current list at Six Flags St. Louis in this edit. Yet, the park had no intentions of permanently removing the ride. This is why you cannot rely on the app or website alone for these kinds of decisions.

You may need to review Wikipedia's original research policy, which was mentioned to you earlier (see above). Moving forward, cite a reliable source and/or discuss on the article's talk page before changing the status of a ride. Failure to do so will be seen as disruptive and will likely lead to a block. --GoneIn60 (talk) 13:33, 4 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Canada's Wonderland regarding the removal of Time Warp. Social media posts are not reliable. X (formerly Twitter) is not a reliable source. Johnny Au (talk/contributions) 14:53, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

RCDB is a reliable source, check there Orion123478 (talk) 15:34, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It’s off the website and app

also

https://rcdb.com/2516.htm Orion123478 (talk) 20:20, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://cpfoodblog.com/time-warp-closing-at-canadas-wonderland/ Orion123478 (talk) 20:22, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

See the responses you've received here to learn why those sources are not valid. Above, we have already discussed why the removal from the app and website is not good enough.

It is important for you to cite reliable sources with each edit you are making. Posting in the edit summary or on user talk pages is not sufficient enough. There's more info at Referencing for beginners, and you can seek further assistance at WP:TEA if needed. --GoneIn60 (talk) 21:47, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 01:41, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Orion123478 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Idk why I was blocked, I was getting the sources for everything I edited Orion123478 (talk) 01:45, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Looking at your talk page, it appears you've received several warnings about adding unsourced content over the past month, as well as warnings from last year. You responded to one of the warnings by stating, Omg your so annoying; this shows disinterest in ensuring Wikipedia has well-sourced content, which is core to its function as an encyclopedia. Because this is a long-term concern, your unblock request should address ongoing issues relating to citation. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:31, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was seriously getting the sources from the parks websites, ik I forgot them but I got them and I was about to add them Orion123478 (talk) 01:45, 17 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

March edits - Herschend

You're rushing into things again without having a clear understanding of what's going on or the sources to back up your claims. What sources are you seeing that indicate Herschend has acquired Raging Waters Sydney? The HFE press release clearly states U.S. parks only.—JlACEer (talk) 23:38, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It was on the list/map Orion123478 (talk) 23:42, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Let me double check on that one, you might be right Orion123478 (talk) 23:42, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed it oops, read that wrong, i corrected my edits!! I read they acquired all but the European parks!! Orion123478 (talk) 23:53, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

All of your edits to List of incidents at independent amusement parks were reverted by another user because you failed to explain in the edit summary what you were doing. I figured out that you were moving all those to the List of incidents at Herschend parks page, but it wasn't that obvious to those who haven't been closely following Herschend's acquisitions. A third editor has now stepped in to fix that. All of this could have been avoided if you had just taken the time to explain in the edit summary what you were doing. Stop rushing into things and take the time to do it right the first time.—JlACEer (talk) 13:36, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Air Jumbo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lakefront.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 28 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

April 2025

Please do not add or change content, as you did in this edit at Xtreme Skyflyer, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and to see how to add references to an article. We have discussed with you many times before on why mentioning a non-reliable source in your edit summary is not acceptable. You must take the extra step, locate the source, and then cite it in the article when making changes like this. Failure to do so will lead to another block. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 16:25, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The kd website has it under extended closure

so rn it’s closed Orion123478 (talk) 16:45, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake I forgot to add the source

I just added it Orion123478 (talk) 16:50, 1 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add or remove content based on poorly sourced information, as you did at List of Kings Island attractions in this edit, you may be blocked from editing. You should also avoid making references to X in your edit summaries. 99.9% of the time, X is not a reliable source. It appears you are still struggling to understand this concept. Ask for help instead of continuing down this path. GoneIn60 (talk) 21:09, 10 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please double-check your edits before publishing them

Hello, I am just here to ask you to please double-check your edits for typos and other errors before you publish them. Recently, your additions of notations of each ride's location at Kennywood in their new named areas left several errors in the tables in which the rides are listed, and I had to go through and fix them. You also made a similar typo when moving the Apollo ride from Dorney Park to the defunct section, though that's a simple mistake and easily forgivable (although you did also remove the link to the ride's Wikipedia page when you moved it, which is something to avoid doing). My point in mentioning this is to simply ask you to double-check before publishing things. Maybe use the preview function to make sure you haven't caused any errors, and read everything over to make sure you haven't made any typos. It can be frustrating for other editors to have to do unwarranted cleanup on an article when another editor adds good information in a sloppy manner. Thanks and happy editing! Blubewwy (talk) 18:45, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Ooops, thanks for informing me Orion123478 (talk) 18:51, 16 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

SFA articles closing date

The park is not closed yet and the dates in infoboxes of the attractions are reserved once the date has passed. On November 3, 2025, the infoboxes of the articles associated with the park can then be updated. Jpp858 (talk) 03:52, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh ok Orion123478 (talk) 13:05, 2 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

June 2025

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Kings Dominion, you may be blocked from editing. This isn't your first rodeo. You've had multiple warnings and conversations about adding sources. If you cannot abide by this basic principle, you should not be editing Wikipedia. GoneIn60 (talk) 02:11, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The company announced the new person today Orion123478 (talk) 02:25, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't matter. On Wikipedia, information you add must be verifiable. Most claims you add should be accompanied by a reliable source. You've been told this many times, and you were even blocked for this behavior two months ago, yet you continue to add information without sources. The next time you do this, you will likely be blocked again. If you don't have a source, don't add the information. --GoneIn60 (talk) 02:52, 1 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]