User talk:Onlinemediaaaa7227

Welcome!

Hello, Onlinemediaaaa7227, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft:Neddiesmithofficial, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
The Teahouse, our help forum for new editors

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, visit the Teahouse, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:14, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neddiesmithofficial (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't meet WP:MUSICBIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neddiesmithofficial and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:20, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Onlinemediaaaa7227! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 09:20, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neddie Smith (February 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by UtherSRG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails to satisfy the requirements in WP:NMUSICBIO. Please read those requirements carefully and reassess your sources strictly. -

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neddie Smith and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 19:19, 2 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Neddie Smith moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Neddie Smith. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because I had already declined it; update and then resubmit for review. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. UtherSRG (talk) 20:37, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Neddiesmithofficial (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still doesn't meet WP:MUSICBIO.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Neddiesmithofficial and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because it has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Also, your username gives the impression that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or website, which is against the username policy.

If you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization, you may request unblock and a username change. In your reasons, you must follow all these steps:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement; and
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked; and
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked; and
Provide a new username.

To do this, insert the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked.

Please note that the new username you choose cannot already be taken and in use by another account. You can search to see if the username you'd like to choose is available. If the search returns that no global account with that username exists, that means it is still available.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. UtherSRG (talk) 12:00, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Neddiesmithofficial

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Draft:Neddiesmithofficial has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. UtherSRG (talk) 12:00, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

But the page should not of been taken down the first time. Also I did state I was going to be addressing all the problems with the article. Onlinemediaaaa7227 (talk) 12:08, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That's your conflict of interest talking (which you were notified about at the top of this talk page and you've never addressed). The previous version was legitimately deleted, and should not have been recreated. Also, your comment on the talk page we have a big legal team working on fixing this page indicates this account is being used by or for multiple people and this is not allowed. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:35, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Come on you don’t have to ban my whole IP I will delete my account man. Onlinemediaaaa7227 (talk) 20:55, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please just atleast unban my IP I won’t ever make an account. Onlinemediaaaa7227 (talk) 20:56, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Onlinemediaaaa7227 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I won’t make another account and I will just delete this one. Just please unban my IP. Onlinemediaaaa7227 (talk) 20:57, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This addresses none of the concerns. Yamla (talk) 21:39, 11 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block

Please unban my IP I really am sorry if I have done something wrong but genuinely I am new to Wikipedia. Please.. you can delete my wiki account Onlinemediaaaa7227 (talk) 02:01, 12 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

====User:Onlinemediaaaa7227==

Onlinemediaaaa7227 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights Onlinemediaaaa7227 (talk) 01:47, 14 May 2025 (UTC) ==[reply]

User:Onlinemediaaaa7227

Onlinemediaaaa7227 (talk · contribs · xtools · pages created · logs ^{(block • csd • prod)} · afd)

Reason for requesting afc helper script rights Onlinemediaaaa7227 (talk) 01:47, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

==

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Onlinemediaaaa7227 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Onlinemediaaaa7227 (talk) 02:25, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Redundant request. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:11, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

==

What can I do to reinstate my account? Onlinemediaaaa7227 (talk) 02:25, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-spamun

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Onlinemediaaaa7227 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that my account was blocked for promotional editing and for using a username that suggests a business or organization. I acknowledge this was against Wikipedia's username and editing policies.

I want to continue contributing in a constructive way. I now understand the importance of maintaining a neutral point of view and avoiding edits that appear promotional or self-serving. I will follow Wikipedia's guidelines strictly going forward.

I do not receive any payment for my edits. (If you do, you **must disclose that** here.)

If unblocked, I intend to contribute by improving existing articles, fixing grammar, formatting, and citing reliable sources. I’m particularly interested in topics related to [insert your interest — e.g. music, history, or science].

I would like to change my username to **NSHistoryFan**, which I have checked and confirmed is available.

Thank you for your consideration.

Decline reason:

We don't consider AI-generated appeals. AI just puts words into your mouth that it thinks we want to hear, and you may not even be aware of what you're telling us. Case in point: it instructed you to disclose paid editing (you even left the "If you do, you **must disclose that** here" comment in there), but you chose not to disclose, although earlier you've already clearly indicated otherwise ("we have a big legal team"). I'm declining your appeal. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:19, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Onlinemediaaaa7227 (talk) 02:34, 14 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

May 2025

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Izno (talk) 04:23, 19 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]