Jump to content

User talk:Naraht

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist and topic subscriptions to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Alpha Phi Omega

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Naraht. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Alpha Phi Omega, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 17:10, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

APO category

[edit]

Per our discussion on the list talk page I have created Category:Alpha Phi Omega members and will be adding the articles from the list to it. Categories aren't subject to the same notability requirements as stand alone lists so the category will persist no matter what happens to the list, hopefully this offers much of the same utility as a navigational and organizational aid. TBH I was surprised to find out that the cat didn't exist already. COI aside you've worked really hard on that list and I would hate to see the utility removed from the project. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 08:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Horse Eye's Back Not a determining Condition. Categories for membership in various GLOs have been created in the past and deleted as not a determining condition. I will be proposing that list for deletion.Naraht (talk) 08:37, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If thats true you can just prod it, I have no objection. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 08:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Are you sure though? I see lots of similar cats, Category:Members of the Black Panther Party for example. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 08:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Not a GLO.Naraht (talk) 08:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
What is the difference between a GLO and a political party in terms of being a determining condition? Both are social groups. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 08:46, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
We have Category:Freemasons so we seems to allow fraternal orgs. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 08:49, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
List of Alpha Phi Alpha members also lacks anything which indicates notability... And its not a real FA, look at the history... Its a 2007 FA which would not survive a challenge, not going to challenge because people keep saying I'm battle grounding. Goodnight! Rest assured that I will not be nominating List of Alpha Phi Omega members for deletion anytime soon, take all the time you need to find sources. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 09:09, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Francis University

[edit]

My intention is BOTH Saint Francis University (Pennsylvania) and Saint Francis University (Hong Kong) will get disambiguation term, while Saint Francis University would redirect to University of Saint Francis (which itself is a disambiguation page). --Leeyc0 (Talk) 03:06, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Leeyc0 Please point a place where X University and University of X have a joint Disambiguation page. SFU Pennsylvania is primary over SFU Hong Kong (about 400 links to about 100 links and that's the more favorable way to look at it as Google searches on the two are *far* more imbalanced.Naraht (talk) 12:22, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest to raise this issue to community and let the community decide. I don't think we can make this judgement privately. I am open to both options. --Leeyc0 (Talk) 13:13, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I just raised your concern in Template_talk:College#Template-protected_edit_request_on_10_January_2024. This looks like to be the best place for this issue. --Leeyc0 (Talk) 13:20, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Leeyc0 This being my talk page or Template:College?Naraht (talk) 14:16, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
In the talk page of Template:College --Leeyc0 (Talk) 15:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Pi Alpha Tau

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Pi Alpha Tau, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 16:50, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

[edit]
The Signpost can now drink beer and chant slogans in Canada. What slogans should we chant for the next nineteen years?
Mickey & You: What can you do?
A techie looks at the big questions.
Let the games begin! The 2024 WikiCup is off to a strong start. With copyright enforcement, AI training and freedom of expression, it's another typical week in the wiki-sphere!
The first of two installments, regarding a process of many installments.
Watch out for those space ships!
What are the editorial processes behind covering some of the most politically polarizing and contentious topics on English Wikipedia?
Rest in peace.
Around the world in 365 days (with many stops in India).
The good news is that I've perfected the templates that allow other people to make actually good crosswords.
Getting down to brass tacks &c.

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

[edit]
Plus WMF child rights impact assessment, Chinese Wikipedia changes admin rules
A stream of consciousness about plagiarism on Wikipedia from the perspective of a user who directly witnessed it.
And how you can stop them!
Another wobble, more Ackman, our usual pathological optimist, and football in dirty pants!
Everything you really wanted to know about writing featured articles.
And other new research publications.
Writing a good subheading for a one-sentence joke is basically like writing an entire second joke so I'm not going to do it.
Job changes, death, sex, murder, suicide and a vacation!

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

[edit]
"the exact extent of the obligations" unclear... many such cases!
Lower, trust me!
Finding the right bumblebee among all the bumblebees!
The usual odd articles about Wikipedia.
The hunt for Bertil Ragnar Anzén.
Plus films, Grammys and a rumble!
&c.
That's more than weakly!

The Signpost: 2 March 2024

[edit]
Plus, the U4C Charter keeps planting seeds, the RfA process is set to become more sustainable, and more news from the Wikimedia ecosystem.
And other new findings
Plus, naughty politicians, Federal judge not a fan, UFOs and beavers.
Rest in peace.
If you say it loud enough the views will come your way!
135 battle it out; 67 advance

Northwestern College (Iowa)

[edit]

I noticed that in the right stats sidebar, you changed "Staff" to "Total staff." We typically talk about "faculty" (i.e., those who teach, or professors and instructors) and "staff (i.e., those working in non-teaching roles--from the president to an administrative assistant or maintenance worker). With "Academic staff" and "Total staff," could it seem as if "Total staff" includes "Academic staff"? (It doesn't. We have 84 full-time faculty and 140 full-time non-faculty, or administrators and staff.) Our total full-time employees comes to 224 people. Is there a way to make that clear? Thank you in advance for your help! Skielark (talk) 20:23, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Skielark Please take a look at the documentation on Template:Infobox University, It sounds like what you want is academic_staff=84 and administrative_staff = 140. Does that help?Naraht (talk) 20:27, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it does! Thank you for your help! Skielark (talk) 21:34, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

LI-importance & Syracuse-importance

[edit]

Would you care to elaborate @ Template talk:WikiProject New York (state)#LI-importance & Syracuse-importance, at least so there's a record?   ~ Tom.Reding (talkdgaf)  15:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tom.Reding Good enough?Naraht (talk) 15:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 March 2024

[edit]
Much effort was spent drafting a movement charter about becoming "essential infrastructure of the ecosystem of free knowledge". How much is spent maintaining it?
Signpost interviews Wikimedia Foundation leadership on fundraising banners
And does it have anything to do with the unusual decision to let a zero-edit user open an arbitration request?
Can we compete with social media? Will aoomers forget Wikipedia?
And several papers look at climate change on Wikipedia
WLM winners announced, Wikimania 2024, a new Wikimedia movement affiliate, and active enwp admins reach a record low.
Worldwide women turned blue and controversies on Serbian & French Wikipedia.
Let me take you to the movies.
The only worthwhile grievance is the one that prompts satire.
margin: 0 auto !important;

New Pages Patrol newsletter April 2024

[edit]

Hello Naraht,

New Page Review queue January to March 2024

Backlog update: The October drive reduced the article backlog from 11,626 to 7,609 and the redirect backlog from 16,985 to 6,431! Congratulations to Schminnte, who led with over 2,300 points.

Following that, New Page Patrol organized another backlog drive for articles in January 2024. The January drive started with 13,650 articles and reduced the backlog to 7,430 articles. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 1,340 points in this drive.

Looking at the graph, it seems like backlog drives are one of the only things keeping the backlog under control. Another backlog drive is being planned for May. Feel free to participate in the May backlog drive planning discussion.

It's worth noting that both queues are gradually increasing again and are nearing 14,034 articles and 22,540 redirects. We encourage you to keep contributing, even if it's just a single patrol per day. Your support is greatly appreciated!

2023 Awards

Onel5969 won the 2023 cup with 17,761 article reviews last year - that's an average of nearly 50/day. There was one Platinum Award (10,000+ reviews), 2 Gold Awards (5000+ reviews), 6 Silver (2000+), 8 Bronze (1000+), 30 Iron (360+) and 70 more for the 100+ barnstar. Hey man im josh led on redirect reviews by clearing 36,175 of them. For the full details, see the Awards page and the Hall of Fame. Congratulations everyone for their efforts in reviewing!

WMF work on PageTriage: The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers deployed the rewritten NewPagesFeed in October, and then gave the NewPagesFeed a slight visual facelift in November. This concludes most major work to Special:NewPagesFeed, and most major work by the WMF Moderator Tools team, who wrapped up their major work on PageTriage in October. The WMF Moderator Tools team and volunteer software developers will continue small work on PageTriage as time permits.

Recruitment: A couple of the coordinators have been inviting editors to become reviewers, via mass-messages to their talk pages. If you know someone who you'd think would make a good reviewer, then a personal invitation to them would be great. Additionally, if there are Wikiprojects that you are active on, then you can add a post there asking participants to join NPP. Please be careful not to double invite folks that have already been invited.

Reviewing tip: Reviewers who prefer to patrol new pages within their most familiar subjects can use the regularly updated NPP Browser tool.

Reminders:

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:26, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha Phi Omega (Philippines)

[edit]

I think List of Alpha Phi Omega (Philippines) chapters and alumni associations should be split into two articles, based on its length. Maybe also move the citations to their own column. Thoughts? Rublamb (talk) 15:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rublamb Sounds good. I need to go diving through facebook to find the dates for the last 5 years or so. Official facebook feed of APO Phil should be OK as a ref.Naraht (talk) 15:38, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Eta Upsilon Gamma has been accepted

[edit]
Eta Upsilon Gamma, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Naraht (talk) 19:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol May 2024 Backlog drive

[edit]
New Page Patrol | May 2024 Articles Backlog Drive
  • On 1 May 2024, a one-month backlog drive for New Page Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited MALIK (fraternity), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 25 April 2024

[edit]
Plus, tribute songs and shout-outs outweighing vandalism and hoaxes, a dispute about the real king of the platform and other bits of news.
Plus, new updates on the privacy and research ethics whitepaper and the graphs outage situation, and an Iranian former steward is globally banned from Wikimedia projects
Outcomes of the event including newly published videos and photos, the archived conference website and program, and some attendee reflections on its significance.
A WikiProject report on the 📰🌍 globe's finest news source!
And other recent research publications
Plus Godzilla meets Francis Scott Key!

A tag has been placed on Category:Pages using infobox fraternity with founded incomplete indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 21:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The article Epsilon Nu Tau has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacking sufficient secondary sources to meet WP:ORGCRIT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AusLondonder (talk) 09:02, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Epsilon Nu Tau, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. AusLondonder (talk) 09:03, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Epsilon Nu Tau for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Epsilon Nu Tau is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epsilon Nu Tau until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished, or remove comments from the discussion.

AusLondonder (talk) 12:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox change, recent updates

[edit]

Nice catch, adding Category:Pages using infobox fraternity with missing website. Always a vexing issue.

Might I ask that you confirm whether Sigma Xi now should have a category, like the other Honor Society Caucus fraternities? Since I created the chapter list, I think it is probably appropriate, but defer to you as our resident category expert. Please create it, if fitting. Jax MN (talk) 18:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jax MNRight now, there are only two pages. I'm hesitant since this is a category that has been deleted before. When we get three, no question.Naraht (talk) 18:49, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
At some point, one of us may add a Notables article. We can revisit it then. No problem. Jax MN (talk) 19:09, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Jax MNQuite likely!Naraht (talk) 19:14, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 16 May 2024

[edit]
WMF trustee elections, U4C results, Italian ArbCom, WMF and Endowment annual reports.
We don't know yet, but there is some encouraging news, nevertheless.
Some go out with a bang, some with a whimper, few with much of a comprehensible explanation.
Plus, the WMF joins the Unicode Consortium, Chris Albon talks about AI tools on Wikipedia, communities address under-representation on the site.
More queries are failing, and more frequently, so what is to be done?
It do be like that sometimes.
With cricket and some cute baby reindeer!

Munich

[edit]

Re: Corps Palatia Munich, and my addition of (Munich) in the infobox.

Hi Naraht. Obviously that is the English translation of the German city name now shown as Corps Palatia München in the infobox. As this is the English Wikipedia, I offered this parenthetical clarification for those unfamiliar with the German language. You don't think it useful? Jax MN (talk) 17:55, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 8 June 2024

[edit]
The Form 990, as well as highlights and FAQs, are now available for review.
A new model for collaboration between the WMF and the community?
Hoaxes and the genesis of information.
First line, sixth paragraph, body text or unified Reich?
Outlining progress against the four key goals
A letter.
And various research findings about Wikidata and knowledge graphs.
No we didn't write it, but we tried to cite it
An essay.
... and flagging your articles with big ugly red notices! (This is a good thing.)
Movies, deaths, elections (but no cricket).
Some stuff's only okay in the privacy of the home.
Project in shambles – "it had never occurred to us that this was possible".
Hypertext.

Theta Phi Alpha

[edit]

Why are you reverting my edits to this page? The revisions are needed to reflect what's happening with the National organization. I'm on the Grand Council. Thank you. Katie Evans 2600:4041:6683:1C00:D519:CEC:2999:E6D7 (talk) 20:44, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to respond over at the talk page for the article about Theta Phi Alpha, for more audience. No way to directly alert someone who edits without an account but hope to continue there.Naraht (talk) 20:56, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

[edit]
Three new admins, but overall numbers still shrinking.
Will we weather the storm?
Unbundling, automation, fighting spirit, and a bot named Reimu Hakurei.
Debate unsettled after seventeen years.
Advocacy organizations, a journalist, mycophobes, conservatives, leftists, photographers, and a disinformation task force imagine themselves in Wikipedia.
A journey to a sister project.
Rest in peace.
An article about Etika's appeal and legacy in pop culture.
A virtual visit to the Inland Northwest.
"Simply not good enough".
How well do you know the main page (no peeking)?
...!
Special:Diff/1 and related techno-trivia more complicated than you'd think.
And other new publications on systemic bias and other topics.
Elections, movies, sports.

ISBN

[edit]

Hi, I noticed that you offered Salpynx to help clear ISBN errors: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Salpynx&diff=prev&oldid=1204790683

It's a been a while since I used AWB (I once had a registered account, but abandoned it after some interpersonal issues drove me away) but I think that the easiest task would be to replace every instance of <nowiki>ISBN 9999999999999</nowiki> with {{ISBN|{{Format ISBN|9999999999999|out=13}}}}, where the input string and list of articles are copied from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Check_Wikipedia/ISBN_errors. Using {{Format ISBN}} would mean there is no need to preprocess the input string. The 9999999999999 could be left as is.

I've been working through many of these issues manually, concentrating on the errors that appear to be unique and on articles with more than a couple of errors. I don't think I'll ever get to the articles that have just one error. Any help would be greatly appreciated! 76.14.122.5 (talk) 02:46, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 July 2024

[edit]
Iconic photograph, invalid fair use exemption criterion #3a claimant, or both?
Establishment of power-sharing agreement between WMF corporation and volunteer user community in limbo.
Natalia Tymkiv, Chair of the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation, on the Charter vote results, the resolution, meeting minutes, and proposed next steps.
A lost Signpost submission from fifteen years ago brought into the light, as good and true now as it was then.
Failing forks, smart and well-researched stories, LGBT rights, and oral sex!
Rest in peace.
Do you know these Wikipedia quotes?
Dems in disarray, GOP in chaos — analysts say news expected, but few can predict how race will shape up from here.
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Delta Phi Delta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sweet Pea.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:22, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

[edit]
A STORM over an AI that writes articles. And other notes of interest.
And other findings.
Musk's Twitter acquisition and rebranding have caused long debates on Wikipedia.
And Movement Charter ratification vote comments have been published
Possibly paid articles.
HouseBlaster's reflections on his RfA. In particular, do not ask superlative questions.
Just normally weird!
Come in, you whippersnapper, have a cup of tea.

New pages patrol September 2024 Backlog drive

[edit]
New pages patrol | September 2024 Backlog Drive
  • On 1 September 2024, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, and each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:10, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Arun Kumar Mehta AfD round 2

[edit]

Hi there, as a previous participant in an AfD for Arun Kumar Mehta that was closed as "soft delete," I am notifying you that the article has been refunded and is now up for deletion again at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arun Kumar Mehta (2nd nomination). Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:24, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 September 2024

[edit]
JCW compilation now tracks free DOIs, Wiki Loves Monuments getting started, WMF's status as UN observer stymied by China for fourth time.
Updates from the Portland pol's case, the war in Gaza, and other Wiki-related reports.
And other new research findings
Who are they, why are they running and what are they bringing to the Board?
What all happened in Katowice?
Hannah Clover shares her fondest memories of her first Wikimania.
The Olympics (yay!) and the American election (oh no).
"I can't remember whether he is an incompetent moron, or an incorrigible POV warrior, or some other thing, but either way, to hell with him."

The Signpost: 26 September 2024

[edit]
ANI (but probably not the one you're thinking of), bias and bans, crisis and Clover, Engelhorn's euros, and will the zoomers inherit the project?
In response to a takedown request, Wikipedia editors reached a consensus on how to handle it appropriately.
User Hawkeye7 opens up on his experience as a media representative following the Australian team at the latest Summer Paralympics in Paris.
User asilvering reflects on their recent successful request for adminship.
More changes to RfA on the way in October, final results for the U4C elections revealed, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
Picture this: medicine, drugs, JFK, Cleopatra, anachronism, and global catastrophe.
And other recent research publications.
Band reunions and Beetlejuice!

The Signpost: 19 October 2024

[edit]
Find more about the new Trustees, the first election cycle for admins, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
And other searchings and findings.
Perplexing persistence, pay to play, potential president's possible plagiarism, crossword crossover to culture, and a wish come true!
Can it be fun to address systemic bias? Eighty participants say yes, it can!
Help me make it through the night!
A novel about us, from the point of view of three of us.
Where do I even start?
Pasta, acronyms, and one computer-crashing talk page.

The Signpost: 6 November 2024

[edit]
But not everybody is able to legally read Wikipedia, and not everybody is able to legally edit Wikipedia.
Defamation, privacy, censorship, and elections.
Plus human knowledge and Ozzie places!
Asian News International, the Delhi High Court, and the encyclopedia.
Your photos are more valuable than you may realize.
What is going on?
And Tata too!
IP address privacy tools, and mysterious archive sites.
Many such cases.
[edit]

Interesting discussion, one that gets to the heart of our use of crests, badges and the like. I recently was alerted of a potential copyright or licensing violation which appeared to me to be incorrect, so I brought the issue up for dispute. See Wikipedia:Media_copyright_questions#Member_badge. Once this is resolved we should capture the discussion in our Project archive.
Jax MN (talk) 19:57, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 November 2024

[edit]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

About the proxying issue re JH

[edit]

Courtesy link: this user talk discussion

Hi, Naraht. responding to this comment of yours at JH's TP: Imho, it is not so much a question of whether it involves reverting your own edit or not (although that would likely be viewed as a smaller infraction than reverting someone else's, *if* proxying were involved), but rather at whose behest you are doing the revert. If you decided to revert yourself for reasons entirely your own, then it is not proxying; and if you are influenced to do so by a discussion from a blocked user, then it might be proxying. Even in the latter case, if you take full ownership of it and independently believe it is the right course of action, then you could make the revert, but that is a gray area. That is my interpretation of WP:PROXYING, but others might see it differently. I think a self-revert of the type you dsecribed is probably okay; but if you have any doubts about it, you could simply ask a trusted admin about it on their Talk page, or here on your Talk page either by pinging an individual admin, or using template {{Admin help}}. Cheers, Mathglot (talk) 22:15, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mathglot Thank you. I think the edit in question is the one on The Daily Campus and that isn't mine, it is by Liz and I personally think that as an actual street address, it should either be Storrs-Mansfield, or Storrs as I don't think Storrs, Mansfield, Connecticut is one of the choices by the US Postal Service (and specifically as a *street address*, I *think* USPS trumps WP:COMMONNAME, but I'd like to be sure, get other opinions). And in regards to the ANI comment, I not only have half of the pages I changed on my watchlists, I'm running a search on insource:/Storrs-Mansfield/ whenever I get on Wikipedia. Oddly, I may have been the first one to object to the changes because they kept coming up in all of the Fraternity and Sorority chapter lists where UConn has a chapter. (I'm on WP:FRAT) and because I didn't indicate it elsewhere, Thank you to Liz as well.Naraht (talk) 22:37, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I got pinged to Talk:Storrs, Connecticut § Storrs-Mansfield Discussion by the Rfc bot, and probably won't get into the content dispute regarding the name more than I already have as I don't really care that much, so will probably leave it to others. (I might get involved if proper interpretation of ngrams or other search result data becomes an issue, because casual users of search tools so often get it wrong.) The Talk page is the right place to resolve that, and obviously there have been recent attempts to do so, which have had to deal with the bludgeoning and other issues that left JH temp blocked.
There is certainly no rush as far as resolving this question, and imho it would be a good idea to put off any further attempts to change things at that article for a little while, if only because of the likelihood of a repeat of past strife and wasting our most precious resource (editor time). Once the dust has settled one way or another, a discussion (or possibly an Rfc) down the road might resolve the question among editors dealing with the question collegially and disinterestedly, but I don't think we are there yet on this issue. I think the most efficient path (least use of multiple editors' time) would be to wait a few months, and then try. Just my two cents. Mathglot (talk) 23:09, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Mathglot probably. I don't know if there is any formal way to say "let's put a discussion on ice for a few months", but I can support.Naraht (talk) 00:04, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is an informal way to do so, which is just to propose and get consensus for a moratorium. Sometimes in perennial Rfc questions which keep coming up over and over, someone puts forward a proposal (either while the Rfc is going on or right after) that there should be no further Rfc's on the same topic for <time interval>, which I've seen be up to 18 months for particuarly egregious cases. With such a consensus, premature attempts to raise it again can be hatted, with |result=Moratorium in effect; see <link>.
But here, a much easier response is just silence. After someone proposes a change that is reverted and discussed, if they are unable to gain consensus on the Talk page after a reasonable amount of discussion, there is no requirement for the majority in opposition to respond to every one of their questions or ripostes. You can simply let them have the last word, and keep on talking and talking as much as they want, with no response at all. Their having the last word does not equal consensus, and after hearing nothing back for a while, they usually give up. If they don't, and barge ahead unilaterally, reinserting the oppositional material again, one of the majority simply reverts, with edit summary: "No consensus; see Talk", or "Contrary to previous consensus; see Talk", and if they do it again, a different majority editor should revert and then take them to the Edit warring noticeboard. That should be the end of it.
I would just choose silence at this point, although I fear, as you do, that it will spring up again. If it does, I would respond with one brief sentence in the discussion just like those suggested edit summaries, and then never respond again (unless some completely new argument is supplied which seems unlikely, and even then, they would need consensus). It's fine if they get the last word and then it just fizzles out; that saves you from having to respond. Mathglot (talk) 00:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2009 LGBTQ-related television indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 02:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2010 LGBTQ-related television indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 02:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:2011 LGBTQ-related television indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. plicit 02:28, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 December 2024

[edit]
New arbs to be seated in January.
Will the fifth try at achieving peace be a mudfight, or something better?
Should old acquaintance be forgot?
An editor's reflection on social capital and their changing relationship with Wikipedia culture.
by Tamzin
Wikipedia aims to represent the sum of all knowledge. Is there an imbalance between Western countries and the rest of the world.
Ballooning British bias bombast!
Fighting and killing – on screen, in politics, and in the ring – competes for attention with Disney.
The importance of feedback.

ANI notice

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Apologies, but since you were somewhat involved with UConnIPUser you should be notified. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Very Busy) 19:57, 14 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yoshi24517 I was away from Wikipedia for 12(?) hours and it went from my original reversion of the UConnIPUser change to redirect to the ban hammer being dropped. In some ways I'm sorry I missed it. Feel free to invite me to any other Storrs Connecticut related ugliness :).Naraht (talk) 13:33, 15 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New pages patrol January 2025 Backlog drive

[edit]
January 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 January 2025, a one-month backlog drive for new pages patrol will begin in hopes of addressing the growing backlog.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles and redirects patrolled.
  • Each article review will earn 1 point, while each redirect review will earn 0.2 points.
  • Streak awards will be given out based on consistently hitting point thresholds for each week of the drive.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Holiday Bling

[edit]
The Fraternity/Sorority Barnstar
For figuring out ways to find and track data for our 2024 cleanup project and for creating many categories and tempates needed by WikiProject Fraternities and Sororities.

Rublamb (talk) 19:52, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rublamb thank you very much!Naraht (talk) 14:48, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 December 2024

[edit]
What the VLOP – findings of an outside auditor for "responsibilization" of Wikipedia. Plus, new EU Commissioners for tech policy, WLE 2024 winners, and a few other bits of news from the Wikipedia world.
A personal essay.
Explanations for what led to it and what it was like to undergo it.
Plus, the dangers of editing, Morrissey's page gets marred, COVID coverage critique, Kimchi consultation, kids' connectivity curtailed, centenarian Claudia, Christmas cramming, and more.
Who's news?
And other new research findings.
Good faith edits REVERTED and accounts BLOCKED.
Peace on earth, goodwill to all!
Wicked war, martial law, killing, death and an Indian movie with a new chess champ!

A tag has been placed on Category:Canada's Drag Race Season 3 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:39, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Canada's Drag Race Season 4 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Canada's Drag Race Season 5 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz Read! Talk! 19:40, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Daphne Morrow

[edit]

Why did you roll back this edit? Phil Bridger (talk) 15:01, 9 January 2025 (UTC) Phil Bridger When I figure that out, I'll let both of us know. I've undone the rollback. thank you for letting me know.Naraht (talk) 15:06, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 January 2025

[edit]
The 20th anniversary of The Signpost.
A lot of psephology!
HUMINT or humbug?
Hallelujah!
Johnny Au has edited for 17 years straight without missing a day.
Some thoughts from the original editor-in-chief.
Public Domain Day 2025, Women in Red hits 20% biography milestone, Spanish Wikipedia reaches two million articles, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
The Signpost staff on achievements of '24 and hopes for '25.
The latest crusade?
Our alumni speak!
Applying the scientific method to a model of conflict that leads to arbitration.
This post fact-checked by real Wikipedian patriots.

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 17 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 16 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 15 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 14 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 13 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 12 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 11 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 10 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 9 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 8 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 7 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 6 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 5 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 4 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 1 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:12, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 2 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:13, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 3 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 09:13, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable AWB edit

[edit]

What was this edit for? It looks like it did nothing to the rendered page, a violation of the AWB rules. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:38, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jonesey95Deleted the second space after ISBN in the run-on, which I believe to be part of the "Apply general fixes". And yes, pretty minor, if you choose to revert, go ahead.Naraht (talk) 14:44, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
See WP:AWBRULES, rule 4. Please edit with more care. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:03, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Jonesey95Fair. I will try to do so. It does lead to the question as to *why* AWB can be run with the various skip options on minor changes able to be turned off. But doesn't make it less needed to be watched. Naraht (talk) 15:06, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 7 February 2025

[edit]
But an open language model is ready to help.
The WMF executive team delivers a new update; plus, the latest EU policy report, good-bye to the German Wikipedia's Café, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
Editor Fathoms Below reminisces over their successful RfA from February 2024.
Plus, reports on the ARBPIA5 case, new concerns over projects targeting Wikipedia editors, John Green gets his sponsor flowers, and other news.
Wikimedians and newbies celebrate 24 years of Wikipedia in the Brooklyn Central Library. Special guests Stephen Harrison and Clay Shirky joined in conversation.
Ending with some bans, and a new set of editing sanctions.
The start of the year was filled with a few unfortunate losses, tragic disasters, emerging tech forces and A LOT of politics.

Category:Drag Race Belgique season 2 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 15:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Drag Race Belgique season 1 contestants has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 15:20, 7 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Canada's Drag Race season 1 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 09:29, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Canada's Drag Race season 2 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 09:32, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Canada's Drag Race season 5 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 09:36, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Canada's Drag Race season 4 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 09:38, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Canada's Drag Race season 3 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 09:41, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Drag Race Holland season 2 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 10:00, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Drag Race Holland season 1 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 10:01, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 17 has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 17 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:34, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 16 has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 16 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:34, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 15 has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 15 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 14 has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 14 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 13 has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 13 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 12 has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 12 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 11 has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 11 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 10 has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 10 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 9 has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 9 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 8 has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 8 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 6 has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 6 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 4 has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 4 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:35, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 5 has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 5 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:36, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 7 has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:RuPaul's Drag Race season 7 has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 10:36, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Drag Race México season 1 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 10:45, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Drag Race México season 2 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 10:45, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:The Boulet Brothers' Dragula season 1 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:08, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:The Boulet Brothers' Dragula season 2 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:08, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:The Boulet Brothers' Dragula season 3 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:09, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:The Boulet Brothers' Dragula season 4 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:11, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:The Boulet Brothers' Dragula season 5 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:15, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:The Boulet Brothers' Dragula season 6 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:15, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:RuPaul's Drag Race Down Under season 1 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:18, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:RuPaul's Drag Race Down Under season 2 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:20, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:RuPaul's Drag Race Down Under season 3 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:24, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Drag Race Down Under season 4 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 11:24, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:RuPaul's Drag Race UK series 1 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 15:57, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:RuPaul's Drag Race UK series 2 contestants indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 16:00, 17 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

TRACS article, History section

[edit]

Hello Naraht! Just following up to see if you noticed my ping on the TRACS Talk page? I was looking to see if you had any additional feedback on my proposed TRACS History section. Again, thanks for all your help so far with improving the page! Andy at TRACS (talk) 18:07, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! Checking in to see if you saw my answer to your question on the TRACS Talk page? Thanks Andy at TRACS (talk) 19:45, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Andy at TRACS Yes, I did, but got distracted. I'll try to get it this weekend. Since this is more complex, I'm probably going to just make larger changes related to this myself on the article and then we can go from there.Naraht (talk) 20:09, 20 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Naraht: Thanks! Let me know if you have questions. Andy at TRACS (talk) 20:23, 24 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Naraht: Good day, if there is anything I can answer or provide you to assist in making the larger or more complex changes, please let me know! I truly appreciate your time and efforts! Have a great day.
Andy at TRACS Don't think so, but thank you for bugging me.Naraht (talk) 23:11, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Storrs, Connecticut

[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Storrs, Connecticut—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Newsjunkiect (talk) 01:18, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 February 2025

[edit]
French Wikipedia defends a user against public threats, steward elections, and other news from the Wikimedia world.
"The only time I ever took photos in my entire life".
From patrolling new edits to uploading photos or joining a campaign, you can count on the Wikimedia platform to be up and running — in your language, anywhere in the world. That is, except for a couple of minutes during the equinoctes.
Or just the end of Wikipedia as we know it?
Of "hunters", "busybodies" and "dancers".
User Sennecaster shares her thoughts on her recent RfA and the aspects that might have played a role in making it successful.
What are they? Why are they important? How can we make them better? And what can you do to help?
Liberté, liberté chérie.
Grammys, politics and the Super Bowl.
Straight from the source's mouth. A source is a source, of course, of course!
Turkish linguist wrote about languages and plants; Brazilian informaticist studied Wikimedia projects and education.

Your 'specify for autolink' edits

[edit]

Hi Naraht. I'd reviewed some of your recent edits to the "Type" parameter in the infoboxes, switching from Wikilinks to the words "Social Fraternity", etc. In the case of Ceres, which is legally a women's fraternity, it may create confusion for those who do not know that some of the women's groups use that term. Is there an option to include a template parameter redirect where these few dozen women's fraternities can be called maybe "Social Fraternity (women's)" ?

Noting also how the Type parameter works for Service fraternities, instead of the bare word "Service" it should include the word "Fraternity". It's just clearer that way. Jax MN (talk) 01:16, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jax MNI messed up on Ceres. It should have been Social Fraternity or Social Women's Fraternity. I'll fix. And as for Service, I think both Service and Service Fraternity will be displayed as the same. Fraternity and Sorority are specified for social because they'll link to different pages. And please push back on Template talk:Infobox fraternity as to what the preferred term to actually be typed. Whatever is first for a group is the preferred, I guess.Naraht (talk) 01:21, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to participate in research

[edit]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of a group of Wikipedians to better understand their experiences! We are also looking to interview some survey respondents in more detail, and you will be eligible to receive a thank-you gift for the completion of an interview. The outcomes of this research will shape future work designed to improve on-wiki experiences.

We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this survey, which shouldn’t take more than 2-3 minutes. You may view its privacy statement here. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Sam Walton (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 March 2025

[edit]
It's an ecstasy, my spring.
Let them know what you think!
Read this, then forget all about it.
Life on the Wiki as usual!
And WMF invites multi-year research fund proposals
The Oscars, politics, and death elbow for the most attention.
The photographers are the celebrities!
And very unusual biographical images.
Send not to know
For whom the bell tolls,
It tolls for thee.

The Signpost: 9 April 2025

[edit]
Fellow doctor Osama Khalid remains behind bars for "violating public morals" by editing.
Major changes to core content policy, or still-developing plan for new initiative?
Defeat, or just a setback?
Plus: 30-year anniversary of wiki software commemorated.
Our content is free, our infrastructure is not!
What is to be done?
Advice to aspirants: "Read RfA debriefs", including this one.
Rest in peace.
Snow White sinking, Adolescence soaring, spacefarers stranded, this list has it all!
The Wikimedia Foundation's announcement from Diff.
Gadzooks!

New pages patrol May 2025 Backlog drive

[edit]
May 2025 Backlog Drive | New pages patrol
  • On 1 May 2025, a one-month backlog drive for New Pages Patrol will begin.
  • Barnstars will be awarded based on the number of articles patrolled.
  • Barnstars will also be granted for re-reviewing articles previously reviewed by other patrollers during the drive.
  • Each review will earn 1 point.
  • Interested in taking part? Sign up here.
You're receiving this message because you are a new page patroller. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:25, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battle of the Blades professionals has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

Category:Battle of the Blades professionals has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 07:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battle of the Blades season 6 participants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 07:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battle of the Blades season 5 participants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 07:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battle of the Blades season 4 participants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 07:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battle of the Blades season 3 participants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 07:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battle of the Blades season 2 participants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 07:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Battle of the Blades season 1 participants has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 07:47, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Battle of the Blades templates indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. --woodensuperman 07:57, 29 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 May 2025

[edit]
As always, Wikimedia community governance relies on user participation; plus, more updates from the Wikimedia world
Scrapers, an Indian lawsuit, and a crash-or-not-crash?
And other new research findings.
And don't bite those newbies!
And don't bite those newbies!
Television dramas, televised sports, film, the Pope, and ... bioengineering at the top of the list?
Community volunteers network among themselves and use technology to counter attacks on information sharing.
A look at some product and tech highlights from the Wikimedia Foundation's Annual Plan (July–December 2024).
Hey! At least it is something!
Zounds!
Would a billion articles be a good idea?
There's a lot more to this than you think.
I wonder about having crats, but decided to become one anyway.
Just beautiful photos!
Rest in Paradise.

Concern regarding Draft:Vancouver Law School

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Naraht. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vancouver Law School, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:07, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Extraction issue

[edit]

I found a PDF history of Phi Alpha Delta that lists of all chapters (law school, alumnni/gradaute, and pre-law chapters). However, the lists are in alphabetical order by school name, rather than the chapter name or charter date. This data should be perfect for a drop into Excel so that it can be sorted correctly before creating an article. However, I have been unable to extract the data in its rows, despite that fact that it is clearly in rows in the PDF. Can you take a look and see if you can figure out how to make this work? These lists are too long to manually create IMO. Here is a link to the PDF, with the lists being on pages 195-206. Thanks. Also, just realized we live near each other--I am a couple of house away from D.C. in the valley of Virginia. Rublamb (talk) 17:51, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Rublamb If it helps identify where I am, Connecticut Avenue and Georgia Avenue eventually cross about 7 miles north of the DC line. I can walk to that crossing from my house.
The PDF is particularly wierd in that if you try to copy a chunk from that section, the partial pages (200 & 203), grab everything from one column before moving to the next while all of the full pages grab rows. I'll see what I can do. Oddly, my Linux environment and vi may prove more useful. At worst, I expect comma delimited, which we can make what we want. What order do you want? We also have a lot of information on the changes of names and locations in the area around 114.
Rublamb Initial pull of the law school chapters at User:Naraht/PDD1. Let me know how you want it massaged. May need a slightly different tack on the other ones. I have my corporate version of Excel, so all of the bells and whistles on bringing it in, once I had the tabs in the appropriate places.Naraht (talk) 02:44, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thank goodness you could get it to work! I would like to sort into charter date order. I had not noticed the crazy format of the college names. I guess we can use text to column (at the comma) and concatenate to reassemble in the correct format? Rublamb (talk) 03:04, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
First time I did it, I had it in charter date order. I deliberately sliced off the City/State at the hyphen. Not sure much can be done by the editor to put the school names back together like "Bridgeport, University of, School of Law". I reordered it, check now.Naraht (talk) 03:26, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for getting into charter order. Yeah, since not all college names have the unusual format, my suggestion above will not work. But fixing a few names is nothing compared to manually entering the data. Rublamb (talk) 03:32, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Got all of the University of switched around, uploading.Naraht (talk) 03:33, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
two entries that are William O. Douglas, charter may have moved or split more info likely elsewhere in the doc. But unless you want me to automate adding the square brackets to the Namesake, not sure what else can be automated, looking for suggestions.Naraht (talk) 03:37, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Date templates? Rublamb (talk) 03:41, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You mean dts? Already there. when I put it into excel, I made the format for the dates {{\d\t\s|yyyy|mm|dd}} which dropped them in correctly. :)Naraht (talk) 03:44, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Perfect. Rublamb (talk) 03:46, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Did one more fix, something was wrong with how Saint John's University came over , the single quote turned into 3 or 4 characters. Wierd.Naraht (talk) 03:52, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Rublamb added brackets to all of the honorees. Some need to be dabbed, others are redlinks. I'll start looking at them.Naraht (talk) 17:16, 6 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Secondary school honor society founders has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SMasonGarrison 04:28, 5 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 May 2025

[edit]
And comment is requested on a privacy whitepaper.
And other courtroom drama.
And how he knows it: all about lawyer letters and editing logs.
Why the language barrier is not the only impediment to navigating sources from another culture.
And QR codes for every page!
When an editor is ready to become staff at a public library (not a brother in a fraternity).
Rest in peace.
The technology behind it, and the other stuff.
Gadzooks!
And more.

A barnstar for you!

[edit]
The Teamwork Barnstar
For helping with the Phi Alpha Delta data. I would still be manually entering it. Rublamb (talk) 18:15, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Vancouver Law School

[edit]

Hello, Naraht. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Vancouver Law School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 03:14, 2 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

List of Greek organizations on campuses

[edit]

Hi @Naraht, hope you are doing well. I have a question for you. I recently had an edit deleted from the SUNY Oswego page where I had listed the greek organizations on campus. The user who deleted the edit said "Most Wikipedia editors agree that rote listings of Greek institutions are not helpful if there is no sourcing from outside the college's or university's homepage or the fraternity's own circle." Are you aware of editors agreeing on this? He had some other points but that statement raised my interest. If you're interested you can take a look at it [[1]]. Gooseneck41 (talk) 02:18, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Gooseneck41 Not even close. And I didn't even have to guess who did it. See recent changes to University of Kentucky student life. Drop a note on WT:FRAT if you want help other than adding back the contents of <ref name=":2">Lurding, Carroll and Becque, Fran. (April 13, 2025) "[[Institutions]]". ''[https://www.library.illinois.edu/slc/national-fraternity-collections/fraternity-sorority-almanac/ Almanac of Fraternities and Sororities]''. Urbana: University of Illinois. Accessed May 29, 2023.</ref> and adding it as a ref.Naraht (talk) 03:11, 5 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Naraht thanks for the information. I'll check out the project. It looks like there's a lot of work to do there. Gooseneck41 (talk) 02:00, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 24 June 2025

[edit]
Admins arrested in Belarus.
Pardon our alliteration!
A get-out-of-jail card!
And other new research publications.
Holy men and not-as-holy movies.
Get your self-nomination in by July 2nd!
After two years RuWiki fails to thrive.
With some sweet-and-sour sauce!
Every thing you need to know about the Wikimedia Foundation?
Egad!

Thank you

[edit]

Thank you for reviewing and creating/approving the article on the Exclusive economic zone of Myanmar as per your message on my talkepage.

Please review and approve the similar existing draft articles on the following as well:

Thank you. 220.255.242.109 (talk) 16:28, 7 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have cleared the redirect and you may accept the draft at your leisure. ThadeusOfNazereth(he/him)Talk to Me! 18:27, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

ThadeusOfNazereth. thanx!Naraht (talk) 18:28, 9 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I provided several citations to prove the notability of this album. Examples are online shows they have performed on like KEXP and the documentary movie made about the lead singer, Strange Negotiations. It is also notable for being the origin point of the group. There are already eight other Pedro the Lion albums that were decided to be notable and therefore listed on Wikipedia. Mukilman (talk) 03:32, 10 July 2025 (UTC) Mukilman (talk) 03:30, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Mukilman Strange Negotiations should be used as a reference, rather than using phrasing like "As you can tell on this performance". I don't see individual notability, which would require three references at least as good as the review of the 12/20 performance. I'd use It's Hard to Find a Friend as a guide, especially having three reviews of the album. I'm not saying that the article about that Album is great in terms of references, but I think it represents the minimum needed.Naraht (talk) 03:46, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay I added the changes to make it more like the other album page. Mukilman (talk) 08:32, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support for RPDR Article

[edit]

Hi @HighlandFacts. I recently posted an article for Akashia (drag queen) and someone immediately nominated it for deletion. I would appreciate it if you would take a moment to visit the deletion discussion and add your voice why she should have an article.

Appreciate it.

BadNewsBear (talk) 04:00, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That should read @Naraht. Apologies. BadNewsBear (talk) 04:01, 10 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 July 2025

[edit]
Endowment tax form, Wikimania, elections, U4C, fundraising and a duck!
And how do we know?
Five-year journey comes to healthy fruition.
Wikimedians from around the world will gather in person and online at the twentieth annual meeting of Wikimania.
As well as "hermeneutic excursions" and other scientific research findings.
The report covers the Foundation's operations from July 2023 - June 2024
A step towards objective and comprehensive coverage of a project nearly too big to follow.
Drawn this century!
How data from the Wikipedia "necessary articles" lists can shed new light on the gender gap
Annual plans, external trends, infrastructure, equity, safety, and effectiveness. What does it all mean?
Rest in peace.
Wouldn't it be nice without billionaires, scandals, deaths, and wars?
If you are too blasé for Mr. Blasé and don't give a FAC.